Meyer B D, Wang R, Steiner M J, Preisser J S
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2020 Apr;5(2):146-155. doi: 10.1177/2380084419870128. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
Despite early evidence touting the effectiveness of physician-provided oral health services (POHS), recent evidence suggests these services might have little impact on caries-related outcomes in children. General anesthesia (GA) is often used to treat early childhood caries and may be considered the most extreme utilization outcome. We sought to assess the impact of POHS utilization on dental GA utilization and expenditures.
We used the Medicaid claims of a birth cohort of children born in 2008 in North Carolina ( = 32,558) to determine the impact of POHS on dental utilization and expenditures under GA for individual children. Children were followed until their eighth birthday. We analyzed the association of the number of prior POHS visits with visit-specific outcomes of dental treatment under GA using population-averaged models fit with generalized estimating equations with exchangeable working correlation structure.
Children with 2 or more previous POHS visits had reduced odds of GA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.93; confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.99; = 0.029) and expenditures ($114; CI,-$152.61 to -$75.19; < 0.001) compared to those without physician-provided oral health visits, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and geographic residence. Dental expenditures did not differ between POHS and non-POHS subjects at non-GA visits.
POHS decreased the odds of having dental GA treatment and dental expenditures at GA visits. The role of physicians in oral health care can reduce the impact on the most severe outcome-treatment under general anesthesia.
The results of this study have important financial implications for state Medicaid programs and disease management programs trying to mitigate the costs of treating early childhood caries under general anesthesia. Children who receive physician oral health care are less likely to use and more likely to save money on general anesthesia to complete dental treatment.
尽管早期有证据表明医生提供的口腔健康服务(POHS)有效,但近期证据显示这些服务可能对儿童龋齿相关结局影响甚微。全身麻醉(GA)常用于治疗幼儿龋齿,可被视为最极端的利用结局。我们试图评估POHS利用对牙科GA利用及支出的影响。
我们利用北卡罗来纳州2008年出生队列儿童的医疗补助索赔数据(n = 32,558),以确定POHS对个体儿童牙科利用及GA下支出的影响。对儿童进行随访直至其8岁生日。我们使用拟合具有可交换工作相关结构的广义估计方程的总体平均模型,分析既往POHS就诊次数与GA下牙科治疗特定就诊结局之间的关联。
与未接受医生提供的口腔健康就诊的儿童相比,既往有2次或更多次POHS就诊的儿童接受GA的几率降低(优势比[OR] = 0.93;置信区间[CI],0.87 - 0.99;P = 0.029),支出减少(114美元;CI, - 152.61美元至 - 75.19美元;P < 0.001),同时对年龄、性别、种族/族裔和地理居住情况进行了校正。在非GA就诊时,POHS组和非POHS组的牙科支出无差异。
POHS降低了接受牙科GA治疗的几率以及GA就诊时的牙科支出。医生在口腔保健中的作用可减少对最严重结局——全身麻醉下治疗的影响。
本研究结果对试图降低全身麻醉下治疗幼儿龋齿成本的州医疗补助计划和疾病管理计划具有重要的财务意义。接受医生口腔保健的儿童使用全身麻醉完成牙科治疗的可能性较小,且更有可能节省费用。