J Am Dent Assoc. 2018 Dec;149(12):1024-1031.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2018.07.019. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
The effect of Early Head Start (EHS) on receipt of preventive oral health services (POHS) from both oral and medical health care providers is not known.
The authors compared children enrolled in North Carolina EHS programs with similar children enrolled in Medicaid but not EHS on the use of POHS. They analyzed 4 dependent variables (oral assessment by medical health care provider, oral assessment by oral health care provider, fluoride application by medical health care provider, fluoride application by oral health care provider) by using multivariate logistic regression that controlled for covariates.
Primary caregivers of children enrolled in EHS (n = 479) and Medicaid (n = 699) were interviewed when children were approximately 10 and 36 months of age. An average of 81% of EHS and non-EHS children received POHS from an oral or medical health care provider at follow-up. EHS children had greater odds of receiving an oral health assessment (odds ratio [OR], 2.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.74 to 3.13) and fluoride (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.03) from an oral health care provider than children not enrolled. EHS children had decreased odds (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.99) of receiving fluoride from a medical health care provider.
Both children enrolled in EHS and community control participants had high rates of POHS, but the source of services differed. EHS children had greater odds of receiving POHS from oral health care providers than non-EHS children. EHS and non-EHS children had equal rates for fluoride overall because of the greater percentage of non-EHS children with medical fluoride visits.
The integration of POHS in early education and Medicaid medical benefits combined with existing dental resources in the community greatly improves access to POHS.
目前尚不清楚早期开端计划(EHS)对儿童接受口腔和医疗保健提供者提供的预防性口腔健康服务(POHS)的影响。
作者比较了在北卡罗来纳州参加 EHS 计划的儿童与参加医疗补助计划但未参加 EHS 计划的儿童在使用 POHS 方面的差异。他们通过多元逻辑回归分析了 4 个因变量(医疗保健提供者进行的口腔评估、口腔保健提供者进行的口腔评估、医疗保健提供者进行的氟化物应用、口腔保健提供者进行的氟化物应用),并控制了协变量。
当儿童大约 10 个月和 36 个月大时,对参加 EHS(n=479)和医疗补助(n=699)的儿童的主要照顾者进行了访谈。在随访中,EHS 和非 EHS 儿童平均有 81%接受了口腔或医疗保健提供者提供的 POHS。与未参加 EHS 的儿童相比,EHS 儿童接受口腔保健提供者进行的口腔健康评估(优势比[OR],2.33;95%置信区间[CI],1.74 至 3.13)和氟化物(OR,1.53;95%CI,1.16 至 2.03)的可能性更大。EHS 儿童接受医疗保健提供者提供的氟化物的可能性降低(OR,0.73;95%CI,0.54 至 0.99)。
参加 EHS 和社区对照参与者的儿童都有很高的 POHS 率,但服务来源不同。与非 EHS 儿童相比,EHS 儿童更有可能从口腔保健提供者那里获得 POHS。由于非 EHS 儿童接受更多的医疗氟化物就诊,因此 EHS 和非 EHS 儿童的氟化物总体率相等。
将 POHS 纳入早期教育和医疗补助医疗福利,并结合社区现有的牙科资源,极大地提高了 POHS 的可及性。