Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
J Dent. 2018 Mar;70:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
To compare the effectiveness of three applications of silver diammine fluoride (SDF) solution at yearly interval and three applications of SDF solution or sodium fluoride (NaF) varnish at weekly interval at baseline in arresting active caries in the primary teeth of preschool children.
Children aged 3-4 years (n = 371) who had at least one active caries lesion (ICDAS codes 3-6) in their primary teeth were randomly allocated into three groups: Group 1 - annual application of 30% SDF solution; Group 2 - three applications of 30% SDF at weekly intervals; and Group 3 - three applications of 5% NaF varnish at weekly intervals. Follow-up examinations were performed every 6 mo nths by the same masked examiner.
After 30 months, 309 (83%) children with 1877 caries lesions remained in the study. For cavitated lesions (ICDAS code 5 or 6), the caries arrest rate of Group 1 (48%) was significantly higher than those of Group 2 (33%) and Group 3 (34%), (p < 0.001). Results of multi-level survival analysis showed that the arrest times of cavitated lesions in both SDF groups (Groups 1 and 2) were significantly shorter than that of the NaF varnish group. For moderate caries lesions without visible dentine (ICDAS code 3 or 4), the caries arrest rates were 45%, 44% and 51% in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p > 0.05). Presence of plaque on caries lesion, tooth type and tooth surface type had an influence on caries arrest.
Over a 30-month period, annual applications of SDF solution is more effective than three weekly applications of NaF varnish or SDF solution at baseline in arresting active cavitated dentine caries lesions in primary teeth.
As annual application of SDF solution was found to be more effective than 3 weekly applications of NaF varnish or SDF solution at baseline in arresting active cavitated dentine caries lesions, the former application protocol is preferred for young children who are available for regular caries arrest treatment.
比较在基线时每年应用 3 次银氨溶液(SDF)、每周应用 3 次 SDF 溶液或每周应用 5%氟化钠(NaF)涂料 3 次对学龄前儿童乳牙活跃龋的疗效。
将至少有 1 颗活跃龋损(ICDAS 编码 3-6)的 3 至 4 岁儿童(n=371)随机分配至 3 组:组 1-每年应用 30% SDF 溶液;组 2-每周应用 3 次 30% SDF;组 3-每周应用 5% NaF 涂料 3 次。由同一位盲法检查者每 6 个月进行随访检查。
30 个月后,1877 颗龋损中有 309 颗(83%)儿童仍在研究中。对于龋洞型病变(ICDAS 编码 5 或 6),组 1(48%)的龋病抑制率显著高于组 2(33%)和组 3(34%)(p<0.001)。多水平生存分析结果显示,SDF 组(组 1 和 2)的龋洞型病变的抑制时间均显著短于 NaF 涂料组。对于无肉眼可见牙本质的中龋病变(ICDAS 编码 3 或 4),组 1、2 和 3 的龋病抑制率分别为 45%、44%和 51%(p>0.05)。菌斑存在、牙位和牙面类型对龋病抑制有影响。
在 30 个月期间,与基线时每周应用 3 次 NaF 涂料或 SDF 溶液相比,每年应用 SDF 溶液更能有效抑制乳牙活跃的龋洞型牙本质龋损。
由于每年应用 SDF 溶液比基线时每周应用 3 次 NaF 涂料或 SDF 溶液更能有效抑制活跃的龋洞型牙本质龋损,因此对于可接受定期龋病抑制治疗的幼儿,前者的应用方案更优。