Suppr超能文献

多实验室评估 Epstein-Barr 病毒血清学检测:标准化的必要性。

Multilaboratory Assessment of Epstein-Barr Virus Serologic Assays: the Case for Standardization.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Oct 23;57(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01107-19. Print 2019 Nov.

Abstract

IgA antibodies targeting Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) have been proposed for screening for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, methods differ, and the antigens used in these assays differ considerably between laboratories. To enable formal comparisons across a range of established EBV serology assays, we created a panel of 66 pooled serum samples and 66 pooled plasma samples generated from individuals with a broad range of IgA antibody levels. Aliquots from these panels were distributed to six laboratories and were tested by 26 assays measuring antibodies against VCA, EBNA1, EA-EBNA1, Zta, or EAd antigens. We estimated the correlation between assay pairs using Spearman coefficients (continuous measures) and percentages of agreement (positive versus negative, using predefined positivity cutoffs by each assay developer/manufacturer). While strong correlations were observed between some assays, considerable differences were also noted, even for assays that targeted the same protein. For VCA-IgA assays in serum, two distinct clusters were identified, with a median Spearman coefficient of 0.41 (range, 0.20 to 0.66) across these two clusters. EBNA1-IgA assays in serum grouped into a single cluster with a median Spearman coefficient of 0.79 (range, 0.71 to 0.89). Percentages of agreement differed broadly for both VCA-IgA (12% to 98%) and EBNA1-IgA (29% to 95%) assays in serum. Moderate-to-strong correlations were observed across assays in serum that targeted other proteins (correlations ranged from 0.44 to 0.76). Similar results were noted for plasma. We conclude that standardization of EBV serology assays is needed to allow for comparability of results obtained in different translational research studies across laboratories and populations.

摘要

针对 Epstein-Barr 病毒 (EBV) 的 IgA 抗体已被提议用于筛查鼻咽癌 (NPC)。然而,方法不同,并且这些检测中使用的抗原在实验室之间差异很大。为了能够在一系列已建立的 EBV 血清学检测中进行正式比较,我们创建了一个由 66 个混合血清样本和 66 个混合血浆样本组成的面板,这些样本来自 IgA 抗体水平广泛的个体。从这些面板中取出等分试样并分发给六个实验室,然后用 26 种测定法检测针对 VCA、EBNA1、EA-EBNA1、Zta 或 EAd 抗原的抗体。我们使用 Spearman 系数(连续测量值)和每个测定法的开发者/制造商定义的阳性与阴性之间的百分比一致性(使用预定的阳性截止值)来估计检测对之间的相关性。虽然一些检测法之间观察到了很强的相关性,但也注意到了相当大的差异,即使是针对相同蛋白的检测法也是如此。对于血清中的 VCA-IgA 检测法,有两个截然不同的簇被识别出来,这两个簇之间的中位数 Spearman 系数为 0.41(范围为 0.20 至 0.66)。EBNA1-IgA 检测法在血清中聚集成一个单一的簇,中位数 Spearman 系数为 0.79(范围为 0.71 至 0.89)。在血清中,VCA-IgA(12%至 98%)和 EBNA1-IgA(29%至 95%)检测法的一致性百分比差异很大。针对其他蛋白的血清检测法之间观察到了中等至强相关性(相关性范围为 0.44 至 0.76)。在血浆中也观察到了类似的结果。我们得出的结论是,需要对 EBV 血清学检测法进行标准化,以允许在不同的实验室和人群中进行的不同转化研究中获得的结果具有可比性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验