Suppr超能文献

定义泌尿外科手术中术中放射暴露的国家参考水平:FLASH,一项回顾性多中心英国研究。

Defining a national reference level for intraoperative radiation exposure in urological procedures: FLASH, a retrospective multicentre UK study.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.

King's College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2020 Feb;125(2):292-298. doi: 10.1111/bju.14903. Epub 2019 Sep 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To define reference levels for intraoperative radiation during stent insertion, ureteroscopy (URS), and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL); to identify variation in radiation exposure between individual hospitals across the UK, between low- and high-volume PCNL centres, and between grade of lead surgeon.

PATIENTS/SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In all, 3651 patients were identified retrospectively across 12 UK hospitals over a 1-year period. Radiation exposure was defined in terms of total fluoroscopy time (FT) and dose area product (DAP). The 75th percentiles of median values for each hospital were used to define reference levels for each procedure.

RESULTS

Reference levels: ureteric stent insertion/replacement (DAP, 2.3 Gy/cm ; FT, 49 s); URS (DAP, 2.8 Gy/cm ; FT, 57 s); PCNL (DAP, 24.1 Gy/cm ; FT, 431 s). Significant variations in the median DAP and FT were identified between individual centres for all procedures (P < 0.001). For PCNL, there was a statistically significant difference between DAP for low- (<50 cases/annum) and high-volume centres (>50 cases/annum), at a median DAP of 15.0 Gy/cm vs 4.2 Gy/cm (P < 0.001). For stent procedures, the median DAP and FT differed significantly between grade of lead surgeon: Consultant (DAP, 2.17 Gy/cm ; FT, 41 s) vs Registrar (DAP, 1.38 Gy/cm ; FT, 26 s; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This multicentre study is the largest of its kind. It provides the first national reference level to guide fluoroscopy use in urological procedures, thereby adding a quantitative and objective value to complement the principles of keeping radiation exposure 'as low as reasonably achievable'. This snapshot of real-time data shows significant variation around the country, as well as significant differences between low- and high-volume centres for PCNL, and grade of lead surgeon for stent procedures.

摘要

目的

确定支架置入术、输尿管镜检查术(URS)和经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)术中放射的参考水平;确定英国各医院之间、低容量和高容量 PCNL 中心之间以及主治外科医生级别之间的辐射暴露差异。

患者/受试者和方法:在 1 年期间,回顾性地在英国的 12 家医院中确定了 3651 名患者。辐射暴露定义为总透视时间(FT)和剂量面积乘积(DAP)。使用每个医院中位数的 75%分位数为每个程序定义参考水平。

结果

参考水平:输尿管支架置入/更换(DAP,2.3 Gy/cm;FT,49 s);URS(DAP,2.8 Gy/cm;FT,57 s);PCNL(DAP,24.1 Gy/cm;FT,431 s)。所有程序的各个中心之间 DAP 和 FT 的中位数均存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。对于 PCNL,低容量(<50 例/年)和高容量中心(>50 例/年)之间的 DAP 存在统计学差异,中位数 DAP 分别为 15.0 Gy/cm 和 4.2 Gy/cm(P < 0.001)。对于支架手术,主治外科医生的级别在 DAP 和 FT 上有显著差异:顾问(DAP,2.17 Gy/cm;FT,41 s)与住院医师(DAP,1.38 Gy/cm;FT,26 s;P < 0.001)。

结论

这项多中心研究是此类研究中规模最大的。它提供了第一个全国性的参考水平,以指导泌尿外科手术中的透视使用,从而为“将辐射暴露保持在尽可能低的合理水平”的原则提供了定量和客观的价值。这些实时数据的快照显示了全国各地的显著差异,以及 PCNL 中低容量和高容量中心之间以及支架手术中主治外科医生级别之间的显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验