Kuon Eberhard, Empen Klaus, Rohde Dirk, Dahm Johannes B
Department of Cardiology, Klinik Fraenkische Schweiz, Ebermannstadt, Germany.
Herz. 2004 Mar;29(2):208-17. doi: 10.1007/s00059-004-2552-x.
To determine predictors of patient radiation exposure due to percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and to compare our results with the "preliminary reference levels", recently proposed by the European DIMOND research cardiology group: i. e., 75 Gy.cm(2) for dose area kerma product (DAP), 17 min for fluoroscopy time (T(F)), and 1,300 for cinegraphic frames (F).
For 642 PCI-exclusive of the fraction for diagnostic catheterization to avoid statistical confounder effects-we measured total DAP, cinegraphic (DAP(C)) and fluoroscopic (DAP(F)) fractions, the number of cinegraphic frames and runs, and T(F). DAP(C)/F and DAP(F)/s were calculated to indicate the quality of focusing to the region of interest.
The mean total patient DAP for elective one-, two-, and three-vessel PCI amounted to 6.7, 11.6, and 19.4 Gy.cm(2), for PCI of focal in-stent restenoses to 4.2 Gy.cm(2), and for excimer laser angioplasty of diffuse in-stent restenoses to 19.4 Gy.cm(2), respectively. Recanalization of chronic occlusions and PCI in acute myocardial infarction occasioned mean levels of 16.0 and 17.3 Gy.cm(2). Implantation of one and > or = two stents during one-vessel PCI significantly increased total mean DAP from a baseline level of 5.7 up to 7.1 and to 13.8 Gy.cm(2). DAP significantly varied according to the various PCI target regions and amounted to 4.0, 4.5, and 5.5 Gy.cm(2) for intermedius, diagonal, and left anterior descending arteries, to 4.9, 5.0, and 7.0 Gy.cm(2) for obtuse marginal, left posterolateral, and circumflex arteries, to 8.3, 9.1, and 9.5 Gy.cm(2) for proximal/mid right coronary segments, posterior descending, and right posterolateral arteries, and to 11.6 Gy.cm(2) for saphenous vein grafts, respectively.
This study, carried through by consistent use of radiation-reducing techniques, enables a reliable scoring of patient radiation exposure according to complexity and target vessel of the intended PCI. Our 95th percentiles for elective PCI, for recanalizations of chronic occlusions, and for emergency PCI advise reference levels of 22, 32, and 42 Gy.cm(2) for DAP, of 16, 25, and 24 min for T(F), and of 400, 600, and 700 cinegraphic frames, respectively.
确定经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)导致患者辐射暴露的预测因素,并将我们的结果与欧洲DIMOND研究心脏病学小组最近提出的“初步参考水平”进行比较,即剂量面积比(DAP)为75 Gy.cm²、透视时间(T(F))为17分钟、电影帧数(F)为1300。
对于642例单纯PCI(不包括诊断性导管插入术部分,以避免统计混杂效应),我们测量了总DAP、电影(DAP(C))和透视(DAP(F))部分、电影帧数和运行次数以及T(F)。计算DAP(C)/F和DAP(F)/s以表明对感兴趣区域的聚焦质量。
择期单支、双支和三支血管PCI患者的平均总DAP分别为6.7、11.6和19.4 Gy.cm²,局灶性支架内再狭窄PCI为4.2 Gy.cm²,弥漫性支架内再狭窄准分子激光血管成形术为19.4 Gy.cm²。慢性闭塞再通和急性心肌梗死PCI的平均水平分别为16.0和17.3 Gy.cm²。单支血管PCI期间植入1个和≥2个支架显著增加了总平均DAP,从基线水平5.7 Gy.cm²分别提高到7.1和13.8 Gy.cm²。DAP根据不同的PCI目标区域有显著差异,中间支、对角支和左前降支动脉的DAP分别为4.0、4.5和5.5 Gy.cm²,钝缘支、左后外侧支和回旋支动脉为4.9、5.0和7.0 Gy.cm²,近端/中段右冠状动脉节段、后降支和右后外侧支动脉为8.3、9.1和9.5 Gy.cm²,大隐静脉桥血管为11.6 Gy.cm²。
本研究通过持续使用减少辐射技术,能够根据预期PCI的复杂性和目标血管对患者辐射暴露进行可靠评分。我们择期PCI、慢性闭塞再通和急诊PCI的第95百分位数建议DAP的参考水平分别为22、32和42 Gy.cm²,T(F)分别为16、25和24分钟,电影帧数分别为400、600和700。