• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣植入术后三种抗血栓治疗方案安全性和有效性的多中心回顾性比较

Multicenter retrospective comparison of safety and efficacy among three antithrombotic regimens following TAVI.

作者信息

Ren Yu, Chen Jing, Wang Suchun, Jiang Zhengli, Luo Hua

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Orthopedic, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Linhai, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 11;16:1531361. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1531361. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1531361
PMID:40567362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12188095/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study comprehensively evaluates the safety and efficacy of three antithrombotic regimens following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI), focusing on thrombotic and bleeding complications to provide data-driven insights for optimizing postoperative management.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis included 58 TAVI patients from two medical centers (from August 2022 to July 2024). Patients were assigned to three regimens post-TAVI: Group A (warfarin for 3-6 months transitioned to lifelong aspirin), Group B (warfarin transitioned to rivaroxaban), and Group C (dual antiplatelet therapy transitioned to aspirin). Key exclusion criteria were concurrent cardiac surgeries and severe hepatic or renal dysfunction. Primary outcomes included transfusion rates, bleeding incidents, and thrombotic events. Secondary outcomes included coagulation parameters [international normalized ratio (INR), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D-dimer] and postoperative hospital stay duration.

RESULTS

Transfusion requirements did not differ significantly across groups (p = 0.576). However, significant differences were noted in bleeding events (p = 0.034) and hospital stay duration (p < 0.001) among groups. Group B (warfarin transitioned to rivaroxaban) had the lowest bleeding incidence (0%) and the shortest hospital stay (8.71 ± 3.58 days), compared to Group A (37.5%, 14.71 ± 7.61 days) and Group C (30.0%, 7.50 ± 2.84 days). Transfusion requirements and thrombotic event rates were comparable across groups. APTT was significantly prolonged in Group C (p < 0.001), without corresponding clinical bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Each antithrombotic regimen presented unique clinical benefits and limitations. Transitioning from warfarin to rivaroxaban was associated with a significantly reduced risk of bleeding and shorter hospital stays. Transitioning from dual antiplatelet therapy to aspirin monotherapy significant prolonged APTT without increasing clinical bleeding events. These findings highlight the importance of tailored antithrombotic strategies to optimize post-TAVI outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究全面评估经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后三种抗栓方案的安全性和有效性,重点关注血栓形成和出血并发症,为优化术后管理提供数据驱动的见解。

方法

一项回顾性队列分析纳入了来自两个医疗中心(2022年8月至2024年7月)的58例TAVI患者。患者在TAVI术后被分配到三种方案:A组(华法林使用3 - 6个月后过渡为终身服用阿司匹林)、B组(华法林过渡为利伐沙班)和C组(双联抗血小板治疗过渡为阿司匹林)。主要排除标准为同期心脏手术和严重肝肾功能不全。主要结局包括输血率、出血事件和血栓形成事件。次要结局包括凝血参数[国际标准化比值(INR)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、D - 二聚体]和术后住院时间。

结果

各组间输血需求无显著差异(p = 0.576)。然而,各组间在出血事件(p = 0.034)和住院时间(p < 0.001)方面存在显著差异。与A组(37.5%,14.71 ± 7.61天)和C组(30.0%,7.50 ± 2.84天)相比,B组(华法林过渡为利伐沙班)的出血发生率最低(0%),住院时间最短(8.71 ± 3.58天)。各组间输血需求和血栓形成事件发生率相当。C组的APTT显著延长(p < 0.001),但无相应的临床出血。

结论

每种抗栓方案都有独特的临床益处和局限性。从华法林过渡到利伐沙班与出血风险显著降低和住院时间缩短相关。从双联抗血小板治疗过渡到阿司匹林单药治疗显著延长了APTT,但未增加临床出血事件。这些发现凸显了定制抗栓策略以优化TAVI术后结局的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b182/12188095/9e1086cb9867/fphar-16-1531361-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b182/12188095/e848bd21cf88/fphar-16-1531361-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b182/12188095/bc8f391980d8/fphar-16-1531361-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b182/12188095/e8cf6830674d/fphar-16-1531361-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b182/12188095/da9c1584e65f/fphar-16-1531361-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b182/12188095/9e1086cb9867/fphar-16-1531361-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b182/12188095/e848bd21cf88/fphar-16-1531361-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b182/12188095/bc8f391980d8/fphar-16-1531361-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b182/12188095/e8cf6830674d/fphar-16-1531361-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b182/12188095/da9c1584e65f/fphar-16-1531361-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b182/12188095/9e1086cb9867/fphar-16-1531361-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Multicenter retrospective comparison of safety and efficacy among three antithrombotic regimens following TAVI.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后三种抗血栓治疗方案安全性和有效性的多中心回顾性比较
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 11;16:1531361. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1531361. eCollection 2025.
2
Antithrombotic strategies after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的抗血栓策略:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Sep 1;362:139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.05.060. Epub 2022 May 30.
3
Antithrombotic therapy to prevent cognitive decline in people with small vessel disease on neuroimaging but without dementia.抗血栓治疗预防神经影像学检查发现的小血管疾病但无痴呆的患者认知能力下降。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 14;7(7):CD012269. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012269.pub2.
4
Continuation versus discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy for bleeding and ischaemic events in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery.非心脏手术成年患者抗血小板治疗的继续与停用对出血和缺血事件的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 18;7(7):CD012584. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012584.pub2.
5
Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents for secondary prevention of stroke and other thromboembolic events in people with antiphospholipid syndrome.抗血小板和抗凝药物用于抗磷脂综合征患者中风和其他血栓栓塞事件的二级预防。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 2;10(10):CD012169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012169.pub2.
6
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in high surgical risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗高危外科手术风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0196877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196877. eCollection 2018.
7
Antithrombotic therapy and cardiovascular outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients without indications for chronic oral anticoagulation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.无慢性口服抗凝指征患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的抗栓治疗与心血管结局:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Apr 10;9(3):251-261. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad003.
8
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel and modified-release dipyridamole in the secondary prevention of occlusive vascular events: a systematic review and economic evaluation.氯吡格雷与缓释双嘧达莫在闭塞性血管事件二级预防中的临床疗效与成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(38):iii-iv, 1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta8380.
9
Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for preventing stroke and systemic embolic events among atrial fibrillation patients with chronic kidney disease.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在预防慢性肾脏病房颤患者中风和全身性栓塞事件方面的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 6;11(11):CD011373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011373.pub2.
10
Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents for primary prevention of thrombosis in individuals with antiphospholipid antibodies.抗血小板和抗凝药物用于抗磷脂抗体个体血栓形成的一级预防。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD012534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012534.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Transcatheter Procedure Versus Surgical Interventions for Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Contemporary Evaluation Against Conservative Management.经导管手术与外科手术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的比较:与保守治疗的当代评估
Cureus. 2024 Oct 19;16(10):e71859. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71859. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in Chinese patients with intermediate and high surgical risk for aortic stenosis: a decision analysis on effect, affordability and cost-effectiveness.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中国中高危主动脉瓣狭窄患者的效果、可负担性和成本效益的决策分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 18;14(11):e082283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082283.
3
Comparative Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Moderate-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.
经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中度风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者的比较结果:临床试验的系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Sep 26;16(9):e70268. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70268. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).2024年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心房颤动管理指南,与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)联合制定。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 29;45(36):3314-3414. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae176.
5
What did the transcatheter aortic valve replacement-surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR-SAVR) trials tell us?经导管主动脉瓣置换术-外科主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR-SAVR)试验告诉了我们什么?
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 May 31;13(3):206-210. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-aae-0152. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
6
Transcatheter or Surgical Treatment of Aortic-Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或主动脉瓣狭窄的外科治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2024 May 2;390(17):1572-1583. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2400685. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
7
Apixaban vs. standard of care after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the ATLANTIS trial.阿哌沙班与经导管主动脉瓣置换术后标准治疗的比较:ATLANTIS 试验。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Aug 1;43(29):2783-2797. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac242.
8
Edoxaban versus Vitamin K Antagonist for Atrial Fibrillation after TAVR.TAVR术后艾多沙班与维生素K拮抗剂用于心房颤动的比较
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 2;385(23):2150-2160. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111016. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
9
TAVR Patients Requiring Anticoagulation: Direct Oral Anticoagulant or Vitamin K Antagonist?经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者需要抗凝:直接口服抗凝剂还是维生素 K 拮抗剂?
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 9;14(15):1704-1713. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.05.025. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
10
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923. Epub 2020 Dec 17.