Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China; Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine for Cerebrovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China; Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine for Cerebrovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Dec;70:132-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.08.049. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
Microsurgical treatment of unruptured giant intracranial aneurysms (GIAs) is challenging. Although previous studies regarded clipping as the first option to repair GIAs, quite a number of GIAs are not clippable. We conducted this study to evaluate the postoperative complications and long-term outcome of patients with unruptured GIAs treated by different microsurgical modalities. We retrospectively reviewed 505 consecutive patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) who were surgically treated in our department from 2012 to 2015. Patients with UIAs of which diameter ≥2.5 cm were studied. We reported the characteristics of patients and GIAs. Postoperative major complications were observed, and patient functional status were assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and at the last follow-up. Twenty-one patients with unruptured GIAs were analysed, of whom 12 patients were treated by clipping, whereas 9 patients with unclippable aneurysms were treated by trapping or parent vessel occlusion. Fourteen aneurysms were saccular, and 7 were fusiform or serpentine. The mean aneurysm size was 3.7 ± 1.5 cm. After surgery, major complications were observed in 13 of the 21 (61.9%) patients. One (4.8%) patient died during hospital. After a mean 5.2-year follow-up, 9 (75.0%) patients treated by clipping and 7 (77.8%) treated by non-clipping experienced a good outcome (mRS ≤2). We found no significant difference in both postoperative complications and long-term outcome between clipping and non-clipping group. Favorable prognosis can be obtained in most patients with unruptured GIAs treated by appropriate microsurgical modality.
未破裂巨大颅内动脉瘤(GIAs)的显微手术治疗具有挑战性。虽然之前的研究认为夹闭是修复 GIAs 的首选方法,但相当一部分 GIAs 无法夹闭。我们进行这项研究是为了评估不同显微手术方式治疗未破裂 GIAs 患者的术后并发症和长期预后。我们回顾性分析了 2012 年至 2015 年期间在我科接受手术治疗的 505 例连续未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIAs)患者的资料。研究对象为直径≥2.5cm 的 UIAs 患者。我们报告了患者和 GIAs 的特征。观察术后主要并发症,并采用改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)在出院时和最后一次随访时评估患者的功能状态。分析了 21 例未破裂 GIAs 患者,其中 12 例采用夹闭治疗,9 例未夹闭动脉瘤采用夹闭或载瘤动脉闭塞治疗。14 个动脉瘤为囊状,7 个为梭形或蛇形。平均动脉瘤大小为 3.7±1.5cm。手术后,21 例患者中有 13 例(61.9%)出现严重并发症。1 例(4.8%)患者在住院期间死亡。平均 5.2 年随访后,9 例(75.0%)夹闭治疗患者和 7 例(77.8%)非夹闭治疗患者预后良好(mRS≤2)。我们发现夹闭组和非夹闭组在术后并发症和长期预后方面无显著差异。大多数采用适当显微手术方式治疗的未破裂 GIAs 患者可获得良好预后。