Lan Tianjie, Yang Cuiwei
Department of Electronic Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, P.R. China.
Department of Electronic Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, P.R. China;Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention of Shanghai, Shanghai 200433, P.R. China;Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Assistive Devices, Shanghai 200093, P.R.
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 25;36(4):521-530. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.201808019.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common arrhythmias, which does great harm to patients. Effective methods were urgently required to prevent the recurrence of AF. Four methods were used to analyze RR sequence in this paper, and differences between Pre-AF (preceding an episode of AF) and Normal period (far away from episodes of AF) were analyzed to find discriminative criterion. These methods are: power spectral analysis, approximate entropy (ApEn) and sample entropy (SpEn) analysis, recurrence analysis and time series symbolization. The RR sequence data used in this research were downloaded from the Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Prediction Database. Supporting vector machine (SVM) classification was used to evaluate the methods by calculating sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate. The results showed that the comprehensive utilization of recurrence analysis parameters reached the highest accuracy rate (95%); power spectrum analysis took second place (90%); while the results of entropy analyses and time sequence symbolization were not satisfactory, whose accuracy were both only 70%. In conclusion, the recurrence analysis and power spectrum could be adopted to evaluate the atrial chaotic state effectively, thus having certain reference value for prediction of AF recurrence.
心房颤动(AF)是最常见的心律失常之一,对患者危害极大。迫切需要有效的方法来预防房颤复发。本文采用四种方法分析RR序列,并分析房颤发作前(Pre-AF)与正常时期(远离房颤发作)之间的差异,以寻找判别标准。这些方法包括:功率谱分析、近似熵(ApEn)和样本熵(SpEn)分析、递归分析和时间序列符号化。本研究中使用的RR序列数据从阵发性心房颤动预测数据库下载。采用支持向量机(SVM)分类法,通过计算灵敏度、特异性和准确率来评估这些方法。结果表明,综合利用递归分析参数的准确率最高(95%);功率谱分析位居第二(90%);而熵分析和时间序列符号化的结果并不理想,其准确率均仅为70%。综上所述,递归分析和功率谱可有效评估心房混沌状态,对预测房颤复发具有一定参考价值。