Suppr超能文献

[正常角膜与圆锥角膜之间的粘弹性比较研究]

[A comparative study of viscoelasticity between normal cornea and keratoconus].

作者信息

Zhao Kechao, Wang Xiaojun, Chen Weiyi, He Rui, Li Xiaona, Gao Yan

机构信息

School of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, P.R.China.

School of Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, P.R.China;School of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024,

出版信息

Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 25;36(4):613-618. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.201812052.

Abstract

Study of the mechanical properties of in vivo corneal materials is an important basis for further study of corneal physiological and pathological phenomena by means of finite element method. In this paper, the elastic coefficient ( ) and viscous coefficient ( ) of normal cornea and keratoconus under pulse pressure are calculated by using standard linear solid model with the data provided by corneal visualization scheimpflug technology. The results showed that there was a significant difference of and between normal cornea and keratoconus cornea ( < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under curve (AUC) for , and their combined indicators were 0.776, 0.895 and 0.948, respectively, which indicated that keratoconus could be predicted by and . The results of this study may provide a reference for the early diagnosis of keratoconus and avoid the occurrence of keratoconus after operation, so it has a certain clinical value.

摘要

研究体内角膜材料的力学性能是借助有限元方法进一步研究角膜生理和病理现象的重要基础。本文利用角膜可视化Scheimpflug技术提供的数据,采用标准线性固体模型计算了正常角膜和圆锥角膜在脉冲压力下的弹性系数( )和粘性系数( )。结果显示,正常角膜和圆锥角膜的 和 存在显著差异( < 0.05)。受试者工作特征曲线分析表明, 、 及其联合指标的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.776、0.895和0.948,这表明 和 可用于预测圆锥角膜。本研究结果可为圆锥角膜的早期诊断提供参考,避免术后圆锥角膜的发生,具有一定的临床价值。

相似文献

1
[A comparative study of viscoelasticity between normal cornea and keratoconus].
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 25;36(4):613-618. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.201812052.
2
Determining in vivo elasticity and viscosity with dynamic Scheimpflug imaging analysis in keratoconic and healthy eyes.
J Biophotonics. 2016 May;9(5):454-63. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201500245. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
3
Comparative analysis of the morphological and biomechanical properties of normal cornea and keratoconus at different stages.
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov;41(11):3699-3711. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01929-4. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
4
Corneal Biomechanics in Unilateral Keratoconus and Fellow Eyes with a Scheimpflug-based Tonometer.
Optom Vis Sci. 2018 Jul;95(7):608-615. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001241.
5
Corneal Viscous Properties Cannot Be Determined From Air-Puff Applanation.
J Refract Surg. 2019 Nov 1;35(11):730-736. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20191010-03.
6
Study and characterization of morphogeometric parameters to assist diagnosis of keratoconus.
Biomed Eng Online. 2018 Nov 20;17(Suppl 1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12938-018-0564-7.
7
Comparative evaluation of dual Scheimpflug imaging parameters in keratoconus, early keratoconus, and normal eyes.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Apr;40(4):582-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.061.
9
Keratoconus prediction using a finite element model of the cornea with local biomechanical properties.
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2009 Mar-Apr;72(2):139-45. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492009000200002.
10
Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Combined Scheimpflug and Spectral-Domain OCT Analysis.
Ophthalmology. 2018 Dec;125(12):1862-1871. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.06.020. Epub 2018 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
[Anisotropy and viscoelasticity of different corneal regions in rabbit corneal ectasia model].
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 25;41(1):129-135. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.202312022.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Corneal Biomechanical Properties with Inflation Test Using Optical Coherence Tomography.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2018 Feb;46(2):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s10439-017-1973-7. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
2
Elastic microfibril distribution in the cornea: Differences between normal and keratoconic stroma.
Exp Eye Res. 2017 Jun;159:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
3
Development and validation of a correction equation for Corvis tonometry.
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2016;19(9):943-53. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2015.1077515. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
4
Determining in vivo elasticity and viscosity with dynamic Scheimpflug imaging analysis in keratoconic and healthy eyes.
J Biophotonics. 2016 May;9(5):454-63. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201500245. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
5
The influence of intraocular pressure and air jet pressure on corneal contactless tonometry tests.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 May;58:75-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.07.030. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
8
A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jan 23;54(1):659-65. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10984.
9
Corneal deformation measurement using Scheimpflug noncontact tonometry.
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Jan;90(1):e1-8. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318279eb87.
10
Biomechanical analysis of the keratoconic cornea.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009 Jul;2(3):224-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Jul 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验