Carlson Douglas B, Dale Pat E R, Kurucz Nina, Dwyer Patrick G, Knight Jon M, Whelan Peter I, Richards D Diane
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2019 Jun;35(2):123-134. doi: 10.2987/18-6807.1.
The aims of this review were to compare planning for both mosquito control and land use in east-central Florida, USA, and in New South Wales, Queensland, and the Northern Territory, Australia. Saltwater mosquito production in mangroves and salt marsh is the predominant mosquito control concern in all the areas. Urban encroachment towards saltwater mosquito habitats is a problem in both Florida and Australia. In east-central Florida and the Northern Territory, mosquito control is supported by comprehensive source reduction programs, whereas in Queensland and New South Wales, larviciding is the main method of control. The long-term control by source reduction programs reduces vulnerability to mosquito issues as population encroaches towards wetlands, whereas larviciding programs have to respond repeatedly as problems arise. Problems from urban encroachment are exacerbated if mosquito control and land-use planning are not integrated. Further, urban planning that is not informed by mosquito management can lead to increased mosquito problems by inadvertent design or allowing residential development close to mosquito habitats. This increases the need for mosquito control and related resourcing. At the regional level of governance, Florida and the Northern Territory generally have greater integration between planning for development and mosquito control than at the local government level in New South Wales and Queensland, where there is a lack of integration between mosquito agencies and planners. It is concluded that coordination of planning and mosquito control is more effective at higher government levels than at local levels, which have less connectivity between management areas and/or insufficient resources. The lesson is that collaboration can assist in avoiding or resolving conflicts.
本综述的目的是比较美国佛罗里达州中东部以及澳大利亚新南威尔士州、昆士兰州和北领地在蚊虫控制和土地利用规划方面的情况。红树林和盐沼中的咸水蚊子繁殖是所有这些地区主要的蚊虫控制关注点。城市向咸水蚊子栖息地的扩张在佛罗里达州和澳大利亚都是一个问题。在佛罗里达州中东部和北领地,蚊虫控制得到了全面的源头减少计划的支持,而在昆士兰州和新南威尔士州,杀幼虫剂是主要的控制方法。随着人口向湿地逼近,通过源头减少计划进行的长期控制降低了对蚊虫问题的脆弱性,而杀幼虫剂计划则必须在问题出现时反复应对。如果蚊虫控制和土地利用规划没有整合,城市扩张带来的问题会加剧。此外,没有考虑蚊虫管理的城市规划可能会因不经意的设计或允许在靠近蚊虫栖息地的地方进行住宅开发而导致蚊虫问题增加。这增加了对蚊虫控制和相关资源的需求。在区域治理层面,佛罗里达州和北领地在发展规划和蚊虫控制之间的整合通常比新南威尔士州和昆士兰州的地方政府层面做得更好,后两者的蚊虫控制机构和规划者之间缺乏整合。得出的结论是,在政府高层进行规划与蚊虫控制的协调比在地方层面更有效,地方层面管理区域之间的联系较少和/或资源不足。经验教训是,合作有助于避免或解决冲突。