• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用患者健康问卷-2评分预测腰椎融合术后长达1年的患者满意度和恢复工作情况:来自密歇根脊柱手术改善协作组的两年分析

Use of Patient Health Questionnaire-2 scoring to predict patient satisfaction and return to work up to 1 year after lumbar fusion: a 2-year analysis from the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative.

作者信息

Zakaria Hesham Mostafa, Mansour Tarek R, Telemi Edvin, Asmaro Karam, Macki Mohamed, Bazydlo Michael, Schultz Lonni, Nerenz David R, Abdulhak Muwaffak, Schwalb Jason M, Park Paul, Chang Victor

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery.

2Center for Health Services Research, and.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Aug 23;31(6):794-801. doi: 10.3171/2019.6.SPINE1963. Print 2019 Dec 1.

DOI:10.3171/2019.6.SPINE1963
PMID:31443085
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) is a prospective, longitudinal, multicenter, quality-improvement collaborative. Using MSSIC, the authors sought to identify the relationship between a positive Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) screening, which is predictive of depression, and patient satisfaction, return to work, and achieving Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) minimal clinically important difference (MCID) scores up to 2 years after lumbar fusion.

METHODS

Data from a total of 8585 lumbar fusion patients were analyzed. Patient satisfaction was measured by the North American Spine Society patient satisfaction index. A positive PHQ-2 score is one that is ≥ 3, which has an 82.9% sensitivity and 90.0% specificity in detecting major depressive disorder. Generalized estimating equation models were constructed; variables tested include age, sex, race, past medical history, severity of surgery, and preoperative opioid usage.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis was performed. Patients with a positive PHQ-2 score (i.e., ≥ 3) were less likely to be satisfied after lumbar fusion at 90 days (relative risk [RR] 0.93, p < 0.001), 1 year (RR 0.92, p = 0.001), and 2 years (RR 0.92, p = 0.028). A positive PHQ-2 score was also associated with decreased likelihood of returning to work at 90 days (RR 0.76, p < 0.001), 1 year (RR 0.85, p = 0.001), and 2 years (RR 0.82, p = 0.031). A positive PHQ-2 score was predictive of failure to achieve an ODI MCID at 90 days (RR 1.07, p = 0.005) but not at 1 year or 2 years after lumbar fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

A multivariate analysis based on information from a large, multicenter, prospective database on lumbar fusion patients was performed. The authors found that a positive score (≥ 3) on the PHQ-2, which is a simple and accurate screening tool for depression, predicts an inability to return to work and worse satisfaction up to 2 years after lumbar fusion. Depression is a treatable condition, and so in the same way that patients are medically optimized before surgery to decrease postoperative morbidity, perhaps patients should have preoperative psychiatric optimization to improve postoperative functional outcomes.

摘要

目的

密歇根脊柱手术改善协作组(MSSIC)是一项前瞻性、纵向、多中心的质量改进协作项目。作者利用MSSIC,试图确定预测抑郁症的患者健康问卷-2(PHQ-2)筛查呈阳性与患者满意度、重返工作岗位以及腰椎融合术后长达2年实现奥斯维斯特里残疾指数(ODI)最小临床重要差异(MCID)评分之间的关系。

方法

分析了总共8585例腰椎融合患者的数据。患者满意度通过北美脊柱协会患者满意度指数进行测量。PHQ-2评分≥3为阳性,该评分在检测重度抑郁症方面的敏感度为82.9%,特异度为90.0%。构建了广义估计方程模型;测试的变量包括年龄、性别、种族、既往病史、手术严重程度和术前阿片类药物使用情况。

结果

进行了多变量分析。PHQ-2评分阳性(即≥3)的患者在腰椎融合术后90天(相对风险[RR]0.93,p<0.001)、1年(RR 0.92,p = 0.001)和2年(RR 0.92,p = 0.028)时满意度较低。PHQ-2评分阳性还与术后90天(RR 0.76,p<0.001)、1年(RR 0.85,p = 0.001)和2年(RR 0.82,p = 0.031)重返工作岗位的可能性降低相关。PHQ-2评分阳性可预测腰椎融合术后90天未能达到ODI MCID(RR 1.07,p = 0.005),但在术后1年或2年时不能预测。

结论

基于一个大型、多中心、前瞻性腰椎融合患者数据库的信息进行了多变量分析。作者发现,PHQ-2评分阳性(≥3),这是一种简单且准确的抑郁症筛查工具,可预测腰椎融合术后长达2年无法重返工作岗位以及满意度较差。抑郁症是一种可治疗的疾病,因此,如同患者在手术前进行医学优化以降低术后发病率一样,或许患者术前应进行精神方面的优化以改善术后功能结局。

相似文献

1
Use of Patient Health Questionnaire-2 scoring to predict patient satisfaction and return to work up to 1 year after lumbar fusion: a 2-year analysis from the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative.使用患者健康问卷-2评分预测腰椎融合术后长达1年的患者满意度和恢复工作情况:来自密歇根脊柱手术改善协作组的两年分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Aug 23;31(6):794-801. doi: 10.3171/2019.6.SPINE1963. Print 2019 Dec 1.
2
The Association of Preoperative Opioid Usage With Patient-Reported Outcomes, Adverse Events, and Return to Work After Lumbar Fusion: Analysis From the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC).术前阿片类药物使用与腰椎融合术后患者报告的结局、不良事件和重返工作岗位的关系:密歇根脊柱外科学改进合作组织(MSSIC)的分析。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jul 1;87(1):142-149. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz423.
3
Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery for axial back pain in the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative.密歇根脊柱手术改进协作组中因轴向背痛而行腰椎手术患者的特征和结局。
Spine J. 2022 Oct;22(10):1651-1659. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.06.013. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
4
The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative: a statewide Collaborative Quality Initiative.密歇根脊柱手术改善协作组织:一项全州范围的协作质量倡议。
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E7. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15370.
5
The impact of anxiety and depression on lumbar spine surgical outcomes: a Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative study.焦虑和抑郁对腰椎手术结果的影响:密歇根脊柱手术改进协作研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Mar 1;40(6):741-750. doi: 10.3171/2023.12.SPINE23860. Print 2024 Jun 1.
6
Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?腰椎手术后1年的手术效果指标能否准确预测2年的预后?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Dec;25(6):689-696. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE15476. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
7
An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.来自质量结果数据库的分析,第1部分。腰椎手术后的残疾、生活质量和疼痛结果:为共同决策预测可能的个体患者结果。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):357-369. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16526. Epub 2017 May 12.
8
Association of prolonged symptom duration with poor outcomes in lumbar spine surgery: a Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative study.与腰椎手术不良结局相关的症状持续时间延长:密歇根脊柱手术改善协作研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Jun 16;39(4):452-461. doi: 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23249. Print 2023 Oct 1.
9
Correlation of return to work with patient satisfaction after surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: an analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.腰椎滑脱症手术后恢复工作与患者满意度的相关性:质量结果数据库分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 May 1;48(5):E5. doi: 10.3171/2020.2.FOCUS191022.
10
Disparities in outcomes after spine surgery: a Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative study.脊柱手术后的结果差异:一项密歇根脊柱手术改善协作研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 May 7;35(1):91-99. doi: 10.3171/2020.10.SPINE20914. Print 2021 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a predictive model and tool for functional recovery in patients after postero-lateral interbody fusion.后外侧椎间融合术后患者功能恢复预测模型及工具的开发与验证
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 10;20(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05353-z.
2
Predictors of return to work after spinal surgery : systematic review and Meta-analysis.脊柱手术后重返工作岗位的预测因素:系统评价和 Meta 分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Aug 24;19(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04988-2.
3
Using Multimodal Assessments to Reevaluate Depression Designations for Spine Surgery Candidates.
使用多模态评估重新评估脊柱手术候选者的抑郁诊断。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Sep 18;106(18):1704-1712. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01195. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
4
Implications of Preoperative Depression for Lumbar Spine Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.术前抑郁对腰椎手术结局的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2348565. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.48565.
5
The Charlson Comorbidity Index and depression are associated with satisfaction after short-segment lumbar fusion in patients 75 years and older.查尔森合并症指数和抑郁症与75岁及以上患者短节段腰椎融合术后的满意度相关。
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 12;9:991271. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.991271. eCollection 2022.
6
Correlating Psychological Comorbidities and Outcomes After Spine Surgery.脊柱手术后心理合并症与预后的相关性
Global Spine J. 2020 Oct;10(7):929-939. doi: 10.1177/2192568219886595. Epub 2019 Nov 22.