Hiranaka Takaaki, Furumatsu Takayuki, Kamatsuki Yusuke, Sugiu Kazuhisa, Okazaki Yoshiki, Masuda Shin, Okazaki Yuki, Takihira Shota, Miyazawa Shinichi, Nakata Eiji, Ozaki Toshifumi
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Kitaku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
J Orthop Sci. 2019 Nov;24(6):1058-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
Several studies have demonstrated that posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis progresses even after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Few reports described zone-specific cartilaginous damages after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. This study aimed to compare the status of articular cartilage at anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with that at second-look arthroscopy.
This study included 20 patients (20 knees, 10 males and 10 females, mean age 22.4 years, Body mass index 24.4 kg/m) that underwent arthroscopic anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and second-look arthroscopy. Mean periods from injury to reconstruction and from reconstruction to second-look arthroscopy were 3.4 and 15.3 months, respectively. Cartilage lesions were evaluated arthroscopically in the 6 articular surfaces and 40 articular subcompartments independently, and these features were graded with the International Cartilage Repair Society articular cartilage injury classification; comparisons were made between the grades at reconstruction and at second-look arthroscopy. Furthermore, clinical outcomes were assessed at reconstruction and at second-look arthroscopy, using the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, side-to-side difference of the KT-2000 arthrometer, and pivot shift test.
Each compartment showed a deteriorated condition at second-look arthroscopy compared with the pre-reconstruction period. A significant worsening of the articular cartilage was noted in all compartments except the lateral tibial plateau and was also observed in the central region of the medial femoral condyle and trochlea after reconstruction. However, each clinical outcome was significantly improved postoperatively.
Good cartilage conditions were restored in most subcompartments at second-look arthroscopy. Furthermore, posttraumatic osteoarthritic changes in the patellofemoral and medial compartments progressed even in the early postoperative period, although good knee stability and clinical outcomes were obtained. Care is necessary regarding the progression of osteoarthritis and the appearance of knee symptoms in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
多项研究表明,即使在进行前交叉韧带重建后,创伤后膝关节骨关节炎仍会进展。很少有报告描述前交叉韧带重建后特定区域的软骨损伤情况。本研究旨在比较前交叉韧带重建时与二次关节镜检查时关节软骨的状况。
本研究纳入了20例患者(20个膝关节,10例男性和10例女性,平均年龄22.4岁,体重指数24.4kg/m²),这些患者接受了关节镜下解剖双束前交叉韧带重建及二次关节镜检查。从受伤到重建以及从重建到二次关节镜检查的平均时间分别为3.4个月和15.3个月。通过关节镜独立评估6个关节面和40个关节亚区域的软骨损伤情况,并根据国际软骨修复协会关节软骨损伤分类对这些特征进行分级;比较重建时和二次关节镜检查时的分级情况。此外,在重建时和二次关节镜检查时,使用Lysholm膝关节评分、Tegner活动量表、国际膝关节文献委员会评分、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分、KT - 2000关节测量仪的双侧差值以及轴移试验评估临床结局。
与重建前相比,各亚区域在二次关节镜检查时均显示出恶化情况。除外侧胫骨平台外,所有亚区域的关节软骨均出现明显恶化,重建后在内侧股骨髁和滑车的中央区域也观察到这种情况。然而,术后各临床结局均有显著改善。
在二次关节镜检查时,大多数亚区域的软骨状况恢复良好。此外,尽管术后获得了良好的膝关节稳定性和临床结局,但髌股关节和内侧关节在术后早期仍出现了创伤后骨关节炎改变。对于接受前交叉韧带重建的患者,有必要关注骨关节炎的进展和膝关节症状的出现。