• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Performance of Day 5 KIDScore™ morphokinetic prediction models of implantation and live birth after single blastocyst transfer.Day 5 KIDScore™ 形态动力学预测模型对单个囊胚移植后种植和活产的预测性能。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Nov;36(11):2279-2285. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01567-x. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
2
Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3.开发一种能够预测第3天移植胚胎着床潜力的通用形态动力学算法。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2231-44. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew188. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
3
Embryologist agreement when assessing blastocyst implantation probability: is data-driven prediction the solution to embryo assessment subjectivity?胚胎学家在评估囊胚着床概率时的意见一致:数据驱动的预测是否是解决胚胎评估主观性的方法?
Hum Reprod. 2022 Sep 30;37(10):2275-2290. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac171.
4
Enhancing predictive models for egg donation: time to blastocyst hatching and machine learning insights.提高卵母细胞捐赠预测模型:囊胚孵出时间和机器学习的见解。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Sep 11;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01285-9.
5
Can novel early non-invasive biomarkers of embryo quality be identified with time-lapse imaging to predict live birth?能否通过延时成像技术识别胚胎质量的新型早期非侵入性生物标志物,从而预测活产?
Hum Reprod. 2019 Aug 1;34(8):1439-1449. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez085.
6
Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.1730个活检囊胚的非整倍体、标准形态学评估与胚胎发育动力学之间的相关性:一项连续性病例系列研究
Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2245-54. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew183. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
7
Time-lapse imaging derived morphokinetic variables reveal association with implantation and live birth following in vitro fertilization: A retrospective study using data from transferred human embryos.延时成像衍生的形态动力学变量与体外受精后种植和活产有关:一项使用移植人类胚胎数据的回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 19;15(11):e0242377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242377. eCollection 2020.
8
Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system.通过集成延时系统对囊胚形成进行形态动力学分析和胚胎预测。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):376-84.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
9
External validation of a time-lapse prediction model.体外验证时间推移预测模型。
Fertil Steril. 2015 Apr;103(4):917-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.111. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
10
In vitro maturation is associated with increased early embryo arrest without impairing morphokinetic development of useable embryos progressing to blastocysts.体外成熟与早期胚胎阻滞增加有关,但不会损害可用胚胎的形态动力学发育,使其能够发育到囊胚阶段。
Hum Reprod. 2015 Aug;30(8):1842-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev125. Epub 2015 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Human Embryo Culture Conditions, Cryopreservation, and the Potential Risk of Birth Defects in Children Conceived Through Assisted Reproduction Technology.人类胚胎培养条件、冷冻保存与辅助生殖技术受孕儿童出生缺陷潜在风险之间的关联
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 30;61(7):1194. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071194.
2
Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Decision Support Algorithms, Mathematical Models, Calculators Applications in Infertility: Systematic Review and Hands-On Digital Applications.人工智能、临床决策支持算法、数学模型、计算器在不孕症中的应用:系统评价与实际数字应用
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024 Aug 26;2(4):518-532. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.08.007. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Advancements and Challenges in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies: In the Pathway to Non-Invasive Techniques.非整倍体植入前基因检测的进展与挑战:通向无创技术之路
Genes (Basel). 2024 Dec 17;15(12):1613. doi: 10.3390/genes15121613.
4
A review of artificial intelligence applications in in vitro fertilization.人工智能在体外受精中的应用综述。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Jan;42(1):3-14. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03284-6. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
5
The mammalian sperm factor phospholipase C zeta is critical for early embryo division and pregnancy in humans and mice.哺乳动物精子因子磷酯酶 C ζ 对于人和小鼠的早期胚胎分裂和妊娠至关重要。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jun 3;39(6):1256-1274. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae078.
6
Assessment of artificial intelligence model and manual morphokinetic annotation system as embryo grading methods for successful live birth prediction: a retrospective monocentric study.评估人工智能模型和手动形态动力学标注系统作为胚胎分级方法以预测成功活产:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Mar 5;22(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01198-7.
7
Associations between the artificial intelligence scoring system and live birth outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles.人工智能评分系统与胚胎植入前遗传学检测非整倍体周期中活产结局的相关性。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Jan 17;22(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01185-y.
8
The morphokinetic signature of human blastocysts with mosaicism and the clinical outcomes following transfer of embryos with low-level mosaicism.具有镶嵌型的人类囊胚的形态动力学特征,以及低水平镶嵌型胚胎移植后的临床结局。
J Ovarian Res. 2024 Jan 9;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13048-023-01324-w.
9
Delineating the heterogeneity of embryo preimplantation development using automated and accurate morphokinetic annotation.利用自动化和准确的形态动力学注释来描绘胚胎植入前发育的异质性。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Jun;40(6):1391-1406. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02806-y. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
10
Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study.从回顾性研究中评估人类囊胚的活产预测模型的开发和评估。
Elife. 2023 Feb 22;12:e83662. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83662.

本文引用的文献

1
Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.辅助生殖中用于胚胎培养和评估的延时成像系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 25;5(5):CD011320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011320.pub3.
2
Timing of human preimplantation embryonic development is confounded by embryo origin.人类植入前胚胎发育的时间因胚胎来源而变得复杂。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):324-31. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev296. Epub 2015 Dec 4.

Day 5 KIDScore™ 形态动力学预测模型对单个囊胚移植后种植和活产的预测性能。

Performance of Day 5 KIDScore™ morphokinetic prediction models of implantation and live birth after single blastocyst transfer.

机构信息

Service de biologie et médecine de la reproduction, CHU Nantes, 38 boulevard Jean Monnet, 44093, Nantes, France.

Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie UMR 1064, INSERM, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.

出版信息

J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Nov;36(11):2279-2285. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01567-x. Epub 2019 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1007/s10815-019-01567-x
PMID:31444634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6885460/
Abstract

PURPOSE

While several studies reported the association between morphokinetic parameters and implantation, few predictive models were developed to predict implantation after day 5 embryo transfer, generally without external validation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the respective performance of 2 commercially available morphokinetic-based models (KIDScore™ Day 5 versions 1 and 2) for the prediction of implantation and live birth after day 5 single blastocyst transfer.

METHODS

This monocentric retrospective study was conducted on 210 ICSI cycles with single day 5 embryo transfer performed with a time-lapse imaging (TLI) system between 2013 and 2016. The association between both KIDScore™ and the observed implantation and live birth rates was calculated, as well as the agreement between embryologist's choice for transfer and embryo ranking by the models.

RESULTS

Implantation and live birth rate were both 35.7%. A significant positive correlation was found between both models and implantation rate (r = 0.96 and r = 0.90, p = 0.01) respectively. Both models had statistically significant but limited predictive power for implantation (AUC 0.60). There was a fair agreement between the embryologists' choice and both models (78% and 61% respectively), with minor differences in case of discrepancies.

CONCLUSIONS

KIDScore™ Day 5 predictive models are significantly associated with implantation rates after day 5 single blastocyst transfer. However, their predictive performance remains perfectible. The use of these predictive models holds promises as decision-making tools to help the embryologist select the best embryo, ultimately facilitating the implementation of SET policy. However, embryologists' expertise remains absolutely necessary to make the final decision.

摘要

目的

尽管有几项研究报道了形态动力学参数与着床之间的关系,但很少有预测模型被开发出来用于预测第 5 天胚胎移植后的着床,而且这些模型通常没有经过外部验证。本研究的目的是评估两种商业上可用的形态动力学预测模型(KIDScore™第 5 天版本 1 和 2)在预测第 5 天单囊胚移植后着床和活产的各自性能。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入了 2013 年至 2016 年期间在使用时间-lapse 成像(TLI)系统进行的 210 个 ICSI 周期中,这些周期均进行了第 5 天的单个胚胎移植。计算了两种 KIDScore™与观察到的着床率和活产率之间的关联,以及胚胎学家选择的胚胎与模型对胚胎的排名之间的一致性。

结果

着床率和活产率分别为 35.7%。发现两种模型与着床率均呈显著正相关(r=0.96 和 r=0.90,p=0.01)。两种模型对着床均具有统计学上显著但有限的预测能力(AUC 为 0.60)。胚胎学家的选择与两种模型之间存在良好的一致性(分别为 78%和 61%),但在有差异的情况下存在细微差异。

结论

KIDScore™第 5 天预测模型与第 5 天单囊胚移植后的着床率显著相关。然而,它们的预测性能仍有待提高。这些预测模型的使用作为决策工具具有很大的潜力,可以帮助胚胎学家选择最佳胚胎,最终促进 SET 政策的实施。然而,胚胎学家的专业知识仍然是做出最终决策的绝对必要条件。