Iacobellis Francesca, Scaglione Mariano, Brillantino Antonio, Scuderi Maria Giuseppina, Giurazza Francesco, Grassi Roberto, Noschese Giuseppe, Niola Raffaella, Al Zuhir Naail Yarub Sulaiman, Romano Luigia
Department of General and Emergency Radiology, "A. Cardarelli" Hospital, Via A. Cardarelli, 9, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Department of Radiology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Piazza Miraglia 2, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Emerg Radiol. 2019 Dec;26(6):647-654. doi: 10.1007/s10140-019-01714-y. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
In the literature, no consensus exists about which CT protocol is to be adopted in patients who underwent high-energy blunt trauma. The aim of the study is to evaluate the additional value of the arterial phase in the CT assessment of vascular injuries of the liver.
Admission CT examinations for patients with traumatic injury of the liver due to high-energy blunt trauma, performed between 2011 and 2017 in two major trauma centres, were retrospectively reviewed. Images were analysed for presence or absence of liver parenchymal injury, intrahepatic contained vascular injuries and active bleeding in the arterial and portal venous phase of the CT study.
Two hundred twelve patients have been identified. Parenchymal injuries were detected as isolated in 90.6% of cases, whereas they were associated with vascular injuries in 9.4% of cases: contained vascular injuries in 3.3% and active bleeding in 6.1%. Out of all parenchymal injuries detected on the CT portal venous phase, 90.5% were also detectable in the arterial phases (p < 0.0001). All of the contained vascular injuries were visible in the CT arterial phase, whereas they were detectable in 28.5% of cases also during the venous phase (p = 0.02). All 13 cases of active bleeding were detected on the CT venous phase, and 76.9% of these cases were also revealed in the arterial phase, thus confirming their arterial origin (p = 0.22).
The addiction of the arterial phase to the venous phase in the CT assessment of patients who underwent high-energy blunt trauma allows an accurate identification and characterization of traumatic vascular injuries, so distinguishing between patients suitable for conservative management and those requiring interventional or surgical treatment.
在文献中,对于接受高能钝性创伤的患者应采用哪种CT方案尚无共识。本研究的目的是评估动脉期在肝脏血管损伤CT评估中的附加价值。
回顾性分析2011年至2017年在两个主要创伤中心对因高能钝性创伤导致肝损伤患者进行的入院CT检查。分析CT研究动脉期和门静脉期图像中肝实质损伤、肝内血管损伤和活动性出血的有无。
共纳入212例患者。90.6%的病例中实质损伤为孤立性,而9.4%的病例与血管损伤相关:3.3%为局限性血管损伤,6.1%为活动性出血。在CT门静脉期检测到的所有实质损伤中,90.5%在动脉期也可检测到(p<0.0001)。所有局限性血管损伤在CT动脉期均可见,而在静脉期28.5%的病例中也可检测到(p=0.02)。所有13例活动性出血病例均在CT静脉期检测到,其中76.9%在动脉期也显示,从而证实其动脉起源(p=0.22)。
在对接受高能钝性创伤患者的CT评估中,动脉期与静脉期相结合能够准确识别和定性创伤性血管损伤,从而区分适合保守治疗的患者和需要介入或手术治疗的患者。