• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征的通用数据元素:基于统一医学语言系统的分析

Common Data Elements for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Analysis Based on the Unified Medical Language System.

作者信息

Kentgen Markus, Varghese Julian, Samol Alexander, Waltenberger Johannes, Dugas Martin

机构信息

Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Aug 23;7(3):e14107. doi: 10.2196/14107.

DOI:10.2196/14107
PMID:31444871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6729118/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standardization in clinical documentation can increase efficiency and can save time and resources.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this work are to compare documentation forms for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), check for standardization, and generate a list of the most common data elements using semantic form annotation with the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS).

METHODS

Forms from registries, studies, risk scores, quality assurance, official guidelines, and routine documentation from four hospitals in Germany were semantically annotated using UMLS. This allowed for automatic comparison of concept frequencies and the generation of a list of the most common concepts.

RESULTS

A total of 3710 forms items from 86 sources were semantically annotated using 842 unique UMLS concepts. Half of all medical concept occurrences were covered by 60 unique concepts, which suggests the existence of a core dataset of relevant concepts. Overlap percentages between forms were relatively low, hinting at inconsistent documentation structures and lack of standardization.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis shows a lack of standardized and semantically enriched documentation for patients with ACS. Efforts made by official institutions like the European Society for Cardiology have not yet been fully implemented. Utilizing a standardized and annotated core dataset of the most important data concepts could make export and automatic reuse of data easier. The generated list of common data elements is an exemplary implementation suggestion of the concepts to use in a standardized approach.

摘要

背景

临床文档的标准化可提高效率,并节省时间和资源。

目的

本研究旨在比较急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的文档形式,检查其标准化程度,并使用统一医学语言系统(UMLS)通过语义表单注释生成最常见数据元素列表。

方法

使用UMLS对来自德国四家医院的注册表、研究、风险评分、质量保证、官方指南和常规文档中的表单进行语义注释。这使得能够自动比较概念频率并生成最常见概念列表。

结果

使用842个独特的UMLS概念对来自86个来源的总共3710个表单项目进行了语义注释。所有医学概念出现次数的一半由60个独特概念涵盖,这表明存在相关概念的核心数据集。表单之间的重叠百分比相对较低,这暗示了文档结构不一致和缺乏标准化。

结论

该分析表明,ACS患者缺乏标准化且语义丰富的文档。欧洲心脏病学会等官方机构所做的努力尚未得到充分实施。利用最重要数据概念的标准化和注释核心数据集可以使数据的导出和自动重用更加容易。生成的常见数据元素列表是在标准化方法中使用的概念的示例性实施建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f276/6729118/c0fd54a3bc33/medinform_v7i3e14107_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f276/6729118/0ac447e088cd/medinform_v7i3e14107_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f276/6729118/da02d843fea7/medinform_v7i3e14107_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f276/6729118/c0fd54a3bc33/medinform_v7i3e14107_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f276/6729118/0ac447e088cd/medinform_v7i3e14107_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f276/6729118/da02d843fea7/medinform_v7i3e14107_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f276/6729118/c0fd54a3bc33/medinform_v7i3e14107_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Common Data Elements for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Analysis Based on the Unified Medical Language System.急性冠状动脉综合征的通用数据元素:基于统一医学语言系统的分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Aug 23;7(3):e14107. doi: 10.2196/14107.
2
Common Data Elements for Meaningful Stroke Documentation in Routine Care and Clinical Research: Retrospective Data Analysis.常规护理和临床研究中有意义的卒中记录的通用数据元素:回顾性数据分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Oct 12;9(10):e27396. doi: 10.2196/27396.
3
Core Data Elements in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Unified Medical Language System-Based Semantic Analysis and Experts' Review.急性髓系白血病的核心数据元素:基于统一医学语言系统的语义分析与专家评审
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Aug 12;7(3):e13554. doi: 10.2196/13554.
4
The need for harmonized structured documentation and chances of secondary use - results of a systematic analysis with automated form comparison for prostate and breast cancer.统一结构化文档的需求以及二次使用的机会——前列腺癌和乳腺癌自动表单比较的系统分析结果
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Oct;51:86-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
5
Automated UMLS-based comparison of medical forms.基于 UMLS 的医疗表单自动比较。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 4;8(7):e67883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067883. Print 2013.
6
Standardized quality assurance forms for organ transplantations with multilingual support, open access and UMLS coding.具有多语言支持、开放获取和UMLS编码的器官移植标准化质量保证表格。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;212:15-22.
7
ELaPro, a LOINC-mapped core dataset for top laboratory procedures of eligibility screening for clinical trials.ELaPro,一个 LOINC 映射的核心数据集,用于临床试验资格筛选的顶级实验室程序。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 May 14;22(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01611-y.
8
Pragmatic MDR: a metadata repository with bottom-up standardization of medical metadata through reuse.实用型 MDR:通过重用实现医疗元数据自底向上标准化的元数据存储库。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 17;21(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01524-8.
9
Validating UMLS Semantic Type Assignments Using SNOMED CT Semantic Tags.使用SNOMED CT语义标签验证统一医学语言系统(UMLS)语义类型分配
Methods Inf Med. 2018 Feb;57(1):43-53. doi: 10.3414/ME17-01-0120. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
10
The UMLS-CORE project: a study of the problem list terminologies used in large healthcare institutions.UMLS-CORE 项目:大型医疗机构中使用的问题列表术语研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):675-80. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.007047.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical researchers' perception of sharing of metadata from case report forms.医学研究人员对病例报告表元数据共享的看法。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Sep 15;9(1):e10456. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10456. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Europe's Largest Research Infrastructure for Curated Medical Data Models with Semantic Annotations.欧洲最大的经语义注释编辑的医疗数据模型研究基础架构。
Methods Inf Med. 2024 May;63(1-02):52-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1786839. Epub 2024 May 13.
3
Recording of Social Determinants in Computerized Medical Records in Primary Care Consultations: Quasi-Experimental Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Core Data Elements in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Unified Medical Language System-Based Semantic Analysis and Experts' Review.急性髓系白血病的核心数据元素:基于统一医学语言系统的语义分析与专家评审
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Aug 12;7(3):e13554. doi: 10.2196/13554.
2
Data Challenges With Real-Time Safety Event Detection And Clinical Decision Support.实时安全事件检测与临床决策支持中的数据挑战
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 22;21(5):e13047. doi: 10.2196/13047.
3
CDEGenerator: an online platform to learn from existing data models to build model registries.
初级保健会诊中电子病历里社会决定因素的记录:准实验研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jan 25;7:e41706. doi: 10.2196/41706.
4
ELaPro, a LOINC-mapped core dataset for top laboratory procedures of eligibility screening for clinical trials.ELaPro,一个 LOINC 映射的核心数据集,用于临床试验资格筛选的顶级实验室程序。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 May 14;22(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01611-y.
5
Common Data Elements for Meaningful Stroke Documentation in Routine Care and Clinical Research: Retrospective Data Analysis.常规护理和临床研究中有意义的卒中记录的通用数据元素:回顾性数据分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Oct 12;9(10):e27396. doi: 10.2196/27396.
6
Pragmatic MDR: a metadata repository with bottom-up standardization of medical metadata through reuse.实用型 MDR:通过重用实现医疗元数据自底向上标准化的元数据存储库。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 17;21(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01524-8.
7
Automated Identification of Common Disease-Specific Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research Using ClinicalTrials.gov: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.利用ClinicalTrials.gov自动识别常见疾病特定结局以进行比较效果研究:算法开发与验证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Feb 8;9(2):e18298. doi: 10.2196/18298.
CDE生成器:一个从现有数据模型中学习以构建模型注册表的在线平台。
Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 10;10:961-970. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S170075. eCollection 2018.
4
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1990 - 2015年全球、区域和国家310种疾病和损伤的发病率、患病率及伤残调整生命年:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6.
5
Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1980 - 2015年全球、区域和国家249种死因的预期寿命、全死因死亡率和死因别死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1459-1544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1.
6
Improving the value of clinical research through the use of Common Data Elements.通过使用通用数据元素提高临床研究的价值。
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):671-676. doi: 10.1177/1740774516653238. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
7
ODMedit: uniform semantic annotation for data integration in medicine based on a public metadata repository.ODMedit:基于公共元数据存储库的医学数据集成的统一语义标注。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jun 1;16:65. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0164-9.
8
Portal of medical data models: information infrastructure for medical research and healthcare.医学数据模型的门户:医学研究和医疗保健的信息基础设施。
Database (Oxford). 2016 Feb 11;2016. doi: 10.1093/database/bav121. Print 2016.
9
2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2015年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):267-315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
10
Advancing Symptom Science Through Use of Common Data Elements.通过使用通用数据元素推进症状科学。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015 Sep;47(5):379-88. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12155. Epub 2015 Aug 6.