• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病合并急性冠状动脉综合征患者心原性休克和死亡率的 15 年趋势。

Fifteen-Year Trends of Cardiogenic Shock and Mortality in Patients with Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndromes.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Bolzano General Hospital, Bolzano, Italy.

Intensive Cardiac Care Unit and De Gasperis Cardio Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2020 Mar;133(3):331-339.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.07.044. Epub 2019 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.07.044
PMID:31445812
Abstract

PURPOSE

Our study was intended to examine time trends of management and mortality of acute coronary syndrome patients with associated diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 5 nationwide registries established between 2001 and 2014, including consecutive acute coronary syndrome patients admitted to the Italian Intensive Cardiac Care Units.

RESULTS

Of 28,225 participants, 8521 (30.2%) had diabetes: as compared with patients without diabetes, they were older and had significantly higher rates of prior myocardial infarction and comorbidities (all P < .0001). Prevalence of diabetes and comorbidities increased over time (P for trend < .0001). Cardiogenic shock rates were higher in patients with diabetes, as compared with those without diabetes (7.8% vs 2.8%, P < .0001), and decreased significantly over time only in patients without diabetes (P = .007). Revascularization rates increased over time in patients both with and without diabetes (both P for trend < .0001), although with persistingly lower rates in patients with diabetes. All-cause in-hospital mortality was higher in patients with diabetes (5.4 vs 2.5%, respectively, P < .0001) and decreased more consistently in patients without diabetes (P for trend = .007 and < .0001, respectively). At multivariable analysis, diabetes remains an independent predictor of both cardiogenic shock (odds ratio 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.77-2.32; P < .0001) and mortality (odds ratio 1.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-2.26; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite significant mortality reductions observed over 15 years in acute coronary syndromes, patients with diabetes continue to show threefold higher rates of cardiogenic shock and lower revascularization rates as compared with patients without diabetes. These findings may explain the persistingly higher mortality of patients with diabetes and acute coronary syndromes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨合并糖尿病的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的管理和死亡率的时间趋势。

方法

我们分析了 2001 年至 2014 年间建立的 5 个全国性登记处的数据,包括意大利重症监护心脏病房收治的连续急性冠状动脉综合征患者。

结果

在 28225 名参与者中,8521 名(30.2%)患有糖尿病:与无糖尿病患者相比,他们年龄更大,且先前心肌梗死和合并症的发生率明显更高(均 P<0.0001)。糖尿病和合并症的患病率随时间推移而增加(趋势 P<0.0001)。与无糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者的心源性休克发生率更高(7.8%比 2.8%,P<0.0001),且仅在无糖尿病患者中随时间推移显著下降(P=0.007)。在有或没有糖尿病的患者中,血运重建率随时间推移而增加(两者的趋势 P<0.0001),但糖尿病患者的血运重建率仍较低。糖尿病患者的院内全因死亡率更高(分别为 5.4%和 2.5%,P<0.0001),且在无糖尿病患者中死亡率下降更为一致(趋势 P=0.007 和<0.0001)。多变量分析显示,糖尿病仍然是心源性休克(优势比 2.03;95%置信区间,1.77-2.32;P<0.0001)和死亡率(优势比 1.95;95%置信区间,1.69-2.26;P<0.0001)的独立预测因素。

结论

尽管在过去 15 年中观察到急性冠状动脉综合征的死亡率显著下降,但与无糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者的心源性休克发生率仍高出三倍,血运重建率更低。这些发现可能解释了急性冠状动脉综合征合并糖尿病患者的死亡率持续较高的原因。

相似文献

1
Fifteen-Year Trends of Cardiogenic Shock and Mortality in Patients with Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndromes.糖尿病合并急性冠状动脉综合征患者心原性休克和死亡率的 15 年趋势。
Am J Med. 2020 Mar;133(3):331-339.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.07.044. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
2
Trends in the management and outcomes of patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome complicated by cardiogenic shock over the past decade: Real world data from the acute coronary syndrome Israeli survey (ACSIS).过去十年中急性冠状动脉综合征合并心源性休克患者的管理与预后趋势:来自以色列急性冠状动脉综合征调查(ACSIS)的真实世界数据
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 27;8(26):42876-42886. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17152.
3
Ten-year trends in the incidence and treatment of cardiogenic shock.心源性休克发病率及治疗的十年趋势
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):618-26. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00005.
4
Temporal trends in the epidemiology, management, and outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征并发心原性休克患者的流行病学、治疗方法和预后的时间趋势。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Nov;17(11):1124-32. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.339. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
5
Trends in Coronary Angiography, Revascularization, and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死并发心源性休克的冠状动脉造影、血运重建及预后趋势
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 1;117(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
6
Cardiogenic shock developing in the coronary care unit in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者在冠心病监护病房发生的心源性休克。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008 Oct;9(10):1023-9. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328304ae7f.
7
Outcome of patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome on palliative treatment: insights from the nationwide AMIS Plus Registry 1997-2014.接受姑息治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征住院患者的结局:来自1997 - 2014年全国性AMIS Plus注册研究的见解
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 2;5(3):e006218. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006218.
8
Cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events.急性冠状动脉综合征并发心原性休克:来自全球急性冠状动脉事件注册的见解。
Am Heart J. 2012 Jun;163(6):963-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 May 9.
9
Impact of prior revascularization on the outcomes of patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.既往血运重建对ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者预后的影响。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Dec;19(8):923-928. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
10
Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock from Acute Coronary Syndrome Depending on Severity of Obesity.肥胖严重程度对急性冠状动脉综合征所致心源性休克患者预后的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Apr 15;123(8):1267-1272. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of rosuvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe versus rosuvastatin 20 mg in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes.瑞舒伐他汀10毫克加依折麦布与瑞舒伐他汀20毫克治疗动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病和2型糖尿病的比较。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 8;15(1):16012. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00298-7.
2
The Utility and Validation of SCAI-CSWG Stages in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock.SCAI-CSWG分期在急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克患者中的效用及验证
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Nov 19;4(1):102461. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102461. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Diabetes and Its Impact on Cardiogenic Shock Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction with Polyvascular Disease: A Comparative Analysis.
糖尿病及其对合并多支血管病变的急性心肌梗死患者心源性休克预后的影响:一项对比分析
Biomedicines. 2024 Aug 20;12(8):1900. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12081900.
4
Diabetes mellitus in stroke unit: prevalence and outcomes-the Verona acute coronary syndrome and stroke in diabetes outcome (VASD-OUTCOME) study.卒中单元中的糖尿病:患病率与结局——维罗纳糖尿病急性冠状动脉综合征和卒中结局(VASD - OUTCOME)研究
Acta Diabetol. 2024 Dec;61(12):1543-1552. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02318-w. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
5
Trends and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: Insights From USRDS Database.终末期肾病患者心原性休克的趋势和结局:来自 USRDS 数据库的见解。
Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;16(8):e010462. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010462. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
6
Cardiogenic Shock Among Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in a Middle Eastern Country: A Single-Center Experience.中东某国急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的心源性休克:单中心经验
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2023 Jan 20;34(4):232-240. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1323. eCollection 2022.
7
Impact of diabetes on outcomes of cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病对心原性休克结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2022 Sep-Oct;19(5):14791641221132242. doi: 10.1177/14791641221132242.