Suppr超能文献

运用社会投资回报率分析评估健康与社会照护项目的影响:学者们如何推动了该方法的发展?一项系统综述。

Valuing the impact of health and social care programs using social return on investment analysis: how have academics advanced the methodology? A systematic review.

作者信息

Hutchinson Claire Louise, Berndt Angela, Forsythe Deborah, Gilbert-Hunt Susan, George Stacey, Ratcliffe Julie

机构信息

Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia Division of Health Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 24;9(8):e029789. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029789.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify how social return on investment (SROI) analysis-traditionally used by business consultants-has been interpreted, used and innovated by academics in the health and social care sector and to assess the quality of peer-reviewed SROI studies in this sector.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTINGS

Community and residential settings.

PARTICIPANTS

A wide range of demographic groups and age groups.

RESULTS

The following databases were searched: Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Econlit, Medline, PsychINFO, Embase, Emerald, Social Care Online and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Limited uptake of SROI methodology by academics was found in the health and social care sector. From 868 papers screened, 8 studies met the criteria for inclusion in this systematic review. Study quality was found to be highly variable, ranging from 38% to 90% based on scores from a purpose-designed quality assessment tool. In general, relatively high consistency and clarity was observed in the reporting of the research question, reasons for using this methodology and justifying the need for the study. However, weaknesses were observed in other areas including justifying stakeholders, reporting sample sizes, undertaking sensitivity analysis and reporting unexpected or negative outcomes. Most papers cited links to additional materials to aid in reporting. There was little evidence that academics had innovated or advanced the methodology beyond that outlined in a much-cited SROI guide.

CONCLUSION

Academics have thus far been slow to adopt SROI methodology in the evaluation of health and social care interventions, and there is little evidence of innovation and development of the methodology. The word count requirements of peer-reviewed journals may make it difficult for authors to be fully transparent about the details of their studies, potentially impacting the quality of reporting in those studies published in these journals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018080195.

摘要

目的

确定商业顾问传统上使用的社会投资回报率(SROI)分析如何被卫生和社会护理领域的学者所解读、使用和创新,并评估该领域同行评审的SROI研究的质量。

设计

系统评价。

设置

社区和居住环境。

参与者

广泛的人口群体和年龄组。

结果

检索了以下数据库:科学网、Scopus、护理学与健康领域数据库、经济文献数据库、医学期刊数据库、心理学文摘数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、Emerald、社会护理在线以及英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所。发现卫生和社会护理领域的学者对SROI方法的采用有限。在筛选的868篇论文中,有8项研究符合纳入本系统评价的标准。研究质量差异很大,根据专门设计的质量评估工具的评分,质量范围为38%至90%。总体而言,在研究问题的报告、使用该方法的原因以及研究必要性的论证方面,观察到相对较高的一致性和清晰度。然而,在其他方面也发现了一些弱点,包括利益相关者的论证、样本量的报告、敏感性分析以及意外或负面结果的报告。大多数论文引用了与其他材料的链接以辅助报告。几乎没有证据表明学者们对该方法进行了创新或改进,超出了一篇被广泛引用的SROI指南中所概述的内容。

结论

到目前为止,学者们在卫生和社会护理干预评估中采用SROI方法的速度较慢,而且几乎没有该方法创新和发展的证据。同行评审期刊的字数要求可能使作者难以完全透明地说明其研究细节,这可能会影响这些期刊上发表的研究报告的质量。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42018080195。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5748/6720245/f4587888aa3a/bmjopen-2019-029789f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验