École de kinésiologie et des sciences de l'activité physique, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville,, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Faculté de Gouvernance, Sciences Économiques et Sociales, Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique, Lot 660 - Hay Moulay Rachid, 43150, Ben Guerir, Morocco.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Feb 27;17(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00931-w.
Physical Activity and Sport (PAS) interventions can reduce the social and economic burden of non-communicable diseases and improve the wellbeing of the population. Social return on investment (SROI) has the capacity to measure broader socio-economic outcomes in a singular monetary ratio to help identify the most impactful and cost-beneficial intervention. This review aimed to systematically identify and review studies using the SROI method within the field of PAS and assess their quality.
Peer-reviewed and grey literature SROI studies were identified through a systematic search of six databases. Two reviewers independently assessed the identified studies to determine eligibility. Study quality was assessed using the Krelv et al. 12-point framework. For each included study, information was extracted and classified into summary tables. Extracted information included study and participant characteristics, type of outcomes and SROI ratio. The PRISMA guidelines were followed.
Seventeen studies published between 2010 and 2018 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies (94%) were non-peer reviewed publicly available reports, primarily conducted in the UK (76%), by private consulting firms (41%) and included all types of stakeholders (76%). PAS interventions included Primary prevention (47%), Sport for development (29%), Secondary and tertiary prevention (18%) and High-performance sport (6%). SROI ratios, which report the social value created in relation to the cost of an intervention, vary between 3:1 and 124:1 for the high-quality studies.
The SROI framework can be a useful tool to inform policy-making relating to PAS investment as it can account for the wide societal benefits of PAS. The quality of studies in the field would benefit from the employment of an impact map (or logic model), reporting negative outcomes and using objective study designs. The application of the SROI method in the PAS field is relatively recent, and thus further research would be beneficial to promote its potential for policy-making bodies in the field.
身体活动和运动（PAS）干预措施可以减轻非传染性疾病的社会和经济负担，提高人口的幸福感。社会投资回报率（SROI）有能力以单一货币比率衡量更广泛的社会经济成果，以帮助确定最具影响力和成本效益的干预措施。本综述旨在系统地识别和审查 PAS 领域内使用 SROI 方法的研究，并评估其质量。
通过对六个数据库进行系统搜索，确定同行评审和灰色文献 SROI 研究。两名审查员独立评估确定的研究，以确定其合格性。使用 Krelv 等人的 12 点框架评估研究质量。对于每一项纳入的研究，提取信息并分类到汇总表中。提取的信息包括研究和参与者特征、结果类型和 SROI 比率。本研究遵循 PRISMA 指南。
17 项发表于 2010 年至 2018 年的研究符合纳入标准。大多数研究（94%）是非同行评审的公开可用报告，主要在英国（76%）进行，由私人咨询公司（41%）进行，包括所有类型的利益相关者（76%）。PAS 干预措施包括初级预防（47%）、体育促进发展（29%）、二级和三级预防（18%）和高绩效运动（6%）。SROI 比率报告了干预成本与社会价值的比值，高质量研究的比值在 3:1 到 124:1 之间不等。
SROI 框架可以成为 PAS 投资决策的有用工具，因为它可以说明 PAS 的广泛社会效益。该领域研究的质量将受益于使用影响图（或逻辑模型）、报告负面结果和使用客观研究设计。SROI 方法在 PAS 领域的应用相对较新，因此进一步的研究将有助于促进其在该领域决策机构中的潜力。
