• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对神经残疾儿童的医院内家庭中心社会处方试点项目:采用混合方法评估并进行社会投资回报分析。

Hospital in-reach family-centred social prescribing pilot for children with neurodisability: mixed methods evaluation with social return on investment analysis.

作者信息

Gordon Laura, Hastry Megan, Bate Angela, Gordon Katie, Greaves Emily, Dimitriadou Simoni, Rapley Tim, Basu Anna Purna

机构信息

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Level 3, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.

School of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12329-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12329-0
PMID:39885475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11781045/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social prescribing link workers support individuals to engage with community resources, co-creating achievable goals. Most schemes are community-based, targetting adults. Vulnerable populations including hospitalized children with neurodisability and their families, could also benefit from social prescribing.

AIMS

To pilot a hospital-initiated social prescribing service for children with neurodisability and their families; to explore its feasibility, acceptability and undertake social return on investment (SROI) analysis.

METHODS

Mixed-methods cohort study with SROI analysis. We recruited children aged < 16y with neurodisability, identified during inpatient stays, their parents/carers and siblings. Participants received link worker support for 6 months, extending beyond hospital discharge. Pre- and post-intervention pilot data covered profile of needs (Support Star), quality of life (EQ5D/CHU-9D), wellbeing (WEMWBS/CORS) and financial strain. We undertook 22 qualitative observations of family/link worker interactions and 39 in-depth interviews with families, link workers and healthcare professionals. Together these data were analysed within a SROI to establish the costs and social value generated.

RESULTS

Of 48 families supported by the service, 25 were recruited to the evaluation (26 children, aged 10 m-15y; 4 siblings; 36 parents). Baseline quality of life and wellbeing indices averaged below population norms. Link workers were highly effective at supporting families (only 6/151 goals unmet). Unmet need decreased by 6 months (Support Star, p < 0.001). Families reported having felt overwhelmed when trying to adjust to new ways of life post diagnosis/discharge before link worker intervention, with little support to navigate non-medical needs. Parents, link workers and health care professionals found link worker support invaluable for making community services accessible. Families then felt more connected to their communities, and less isolated, with increased belief in their self-efficacy. Families and healthcare professionals felt that the duration of support, and eligibility criteria, should be extended. Inputs to deliver the service for 1 year (49 families) were estimated at £74,736: outcomes for the 18 families studied were estimated at a value of £205,861.

CONCLUSION

Hospital in-reach social prescribing is feasible, acceptable, and addresses a range of otherwise unmet needs of children with neurodisability and their families, showing a positive SROI. Other vulnerable patient groups could also benefit from this approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN23306751 (2.8.22).

摘要

背景

社会处方联络工作人员帮助个人利用社区资源,共同制定可实现的目标。大多数计划以社区为基础,针对成年人。包括患有神经残疾的住院儿童及其家庭在内的弱势群体,也可以从社会处方中受益。

目的

为患有神经残疾的儿童及其家庭试行一项由医院发起的社会处方服务;探讨其可行性、可接受性,并进行社会投资回报(SROI)分析。

方法

采用混合方法队列研究并进行SROI分析。我们招募了住院期间确诊的16岁以下患有神经残疾的儿童、他们的父母/照顾者和兄弟姐妹。参与者接受了6个月的联络工作人员支持,出院后仍继续。干预前后的试点数据涵盖需求概况(支持之星)、生活质量(EQ5D/儿童健康问卷 - 9D)、幸福感(沃里克 - 爱丁堡心理健康量表/儿童幸福感量表)和经济压力。我们对家庭/联络工作人员的互动进行了22次定性观察,并对家庭、联络工作人员和医疗保健专业人员进行了39次深入访谈。这些数据一起在SROI框架内进行分析,以确定产生的成本和社会价值。

结果

在该服务支持的48个家庭中,25个家庭被纳入评估(26名儿童,年龄在10个月至15岁之间;4名兄弟姐妹;36名父母)。基线生活质量和幸福感指数平均低于总体标准。联络工作人员在支持家庭方面非常有效(只有6/151个目标未实现)。未满足的需求在6个月内有所减少(支持之星,p < 0.001)。家庭报告称,在联络工作人员干预之前,试图适应诊断/出院后的新生活方式时感到不堪重负,在满足非医疗需求方面几乎没有得到支持。父母、联络工作人员和医疗保健专业人员发现联络工作人员的支持对于获得社区服务非常宝贵。家庭随后感觉与社区的联系更加紧密,不再那么孤立,对自我效能的信心增强。家庭和医疗保健专业人员认为,支持的时长和资格标准应该延长。为1年(49个家庭)提供该服务的投入估计为74,736英镑:所研究的18个家庭的结果估计价值为205,861英镑。

结论

医院内的社会处方是可行的、可接受的,满足了患有神经残疾的儿童及其家庭一系列原本未得到满足的需求,显示出积极的社会投资回报。其他弱势群体也可能从这种方法中受益。

试验注册

ISRCTN23306751(2022年8月2日)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f91/11781045/0a3915152421/12913_2025_12329_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f91/11781045/a8ac22d1d70d/12913_2025_12329_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f91/11781045/0a3915152421/12913_2025_12329_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f91/11781045/a8ac22d1d70d/12913_2025_12329_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f91/11781045/0a3915152421/12913_2025_12329_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Hospital in-reach family-centred social prescribing pilot for children with neurodisability: mixed methods evaluation with social return on investment analysis.针对神经残疾儿童的医院内家庭中心社会处方试点项目:采用混合方法评估并进行社会投资回报分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12329-0.
2
Social prescribing for children and young people with neurodisability and their families initiated in a hospital setting: a systematic review.医院环境中针对神经发育障碍儿童和青少年及其家庭开展的社会处方服务:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 21;13(12):e078097. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078097.
3
Impact of a social prescribing intervention in North East England on adults with type 2 diabetes: the SPRING_NE multimethod study.英格兰东北部社会处方干预对 2 型糖尿病成人的影响:SPRING_NE 多方法研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Mar;11(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/AQXC8219.
4
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
5
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
6
An intervention for parents with severe personality difficulties whose children have mental health problems: a feasibility RCT.一项针对有严重人格障碍且其子女有心理健康问题的父母的干预措施:一项可行性 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(14):1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta24140.
7
Patient buy-in to social prescribing through link workers as part of person-centred care: a realist evaluation.患者通过联络人员接受社会处方作为以患者为中心的护理的一部分:一项现实主义评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 25:1-17. doi: 10.3310/ETND8254.
8
A coadapted community-based participatory group programme for parents/carers of children with complex neurodisability (Encompass-2): a pilot and feasibility study protocol.一项针对患有复杂神经残疾儿童的父母/照料者的基于社区的适应性联合小组计划(Encompass-2):一项试点和可行性研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 May 3;11(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01619-3.
9
Child, family and professional views on valued communication outcomes for non-verbal children with neurodisability: A qualitative meta-synthesis.儿童、家庭和专业人员对神经发育障碍的非言语儿童有价值的沟通结果的看法:定性元分析。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Nov-Dec;59(6):2946-2984. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13121. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
10
The consequences of micro-discretions and boundaries in the social prescribing link worker role in England: a realist evaluation.英格兰社会处方联络工作人员角色中微观决策和界限的后果:一项实在论评价
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 11:1-17. doi: 10.3310/JSQY9840.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare professionals' attitudes towards social prescribing in specialist children's weight management services.医疗保健专业人员对专科儿童体重管理服务中社会处方的态度。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Feb 26;26(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02753-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Implications of Health Equity for Children With Disabilities.健康公平对残疾儿童的影响。
JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Jun 1;178(6):518-519. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.0763.
2
Screening tools to address social determinants of health in the United States: A systematic review.美国用于解决健康问题社会决定因素的筛查工具:一项系统综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr 5;8(1):e60. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.506. eCollection 2024.
3
Understanding responsibility for health inequalities in children's hospitals in England: a qualitative study with hospital staff.
理解英格兰儿童医院中儿童健康不平等现象的责任:一项对医院工作人员的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 10;14(4):e081056. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081056.
4
Social prescribing for children and youth: A scoping review protocol.社交处方用于儿童和青少年:范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0297535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297535. eCollection 2024.
5
How do children's hospitals address health inequalities: a grey literature scoping review.儿童医院如何解决健康不平等问题:灰色文献范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):e079744. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079744.
6
Social prescribing for children and young people with neurodisability and their families initiated in a hospital setting: a systematic review.医院环境中针对神经发育障碍儿童和青少年及其家庭开展的社会处方服务:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 21;13(12):e078097. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078097.
7
What is the best way to evaluate social prescribing? A qualitative feasibility assessment for a national impact evaluation study in England.评估社会处方的最佳方法是什么?一项针对英格兰全国性影响评估研究的定性可行性评估。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2024 Apr;29(2):111-121. doi: 10.1177/13558196231212854. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
8
What do parents want from healthcare services? Reports of parents' experiences with pediatric service delivery for their children with disabilities.家长对医疗保健服务有何期望?关于家长对残疾儿童提供儿科服务的体验报告。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jun;46(12):2670-2683. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2229733. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
9
Barriers and facilitators to social prescribing in child and youth mental health: perspectives from the frontline.促进儿童和青少年心理健康的社会处方实施的障碍和促进因素:来自一线的观点。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 May;33(5):1465-1479. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02257-x. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
10
Social Return on Investment of Social Prescribing via a Diabetes Technician for Preventing Type 2 Diabetes Progression.通过糖尿病技术人员进行社会处方以预防 2 型糖尿病进展的社会投资回报。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 7;20(12):6074. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20126074.