Suppr超能文献

共聚焦内镜检查与组织病理学在胃肠道息肉样病变中的比较研究:一项前瞻性单中心经验。

A study on confocal endomicroscopy in comparison with histopathology for polypoidal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract: A prospective single-centre experience.

作者信息

Shah Parvez Ahmed, Shah Bhavik Bharat, Rai Vijay Kumar, Khan Enam, Goenka Mahesh Kumar

机构信息

Institute of Gastrosciences and Liver, Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals, Kolkata, 700 054, India.

Department of Pathology, Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals, Kolkata, 700 054, India.

出版信息

Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;38(4):332-337. doi: 10.1007/s12664-019-00973-4. Epub 2019 Aug 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) has a potential to make optical diagnosis of neoplastic polypoidal lesions and may replace traditional histology in the proposed "diagnose and discard approach". The present study was planned to assess the accuracy of probe-based CLE in predicting histology of polypoidal lesions of gastrointestinal (GI) tract in vivo before their removal.

METHODS

In this prospective single-centre study, patients with upper and/or lower GI polypoidal lesions were enrolled. After detection of polypoidal lesions with white light endoscopy, probe-based CLE examination was performed. Real-time and offline presumptive CLE diagnosis of polypoidal lesions was made as per Miami classification and was compared with histopathology as the gold standard.

RESULTS

A total of 50 GI polyps from 50 patients (28 males) were assessed. The mean (±SD) size of polyps was 13.7 (± 8.5) mm. Most polyps were located at the cecum (24.0%) or stomach (24.0%). On histological examination, hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps, adenocarcinoma, and lipoma were seen in 54%, 26%, 18% and 2% patients, respectively. On comparison of real-time CLE examination with histopathology, 40 (83.3%) and 8 patients (16.7%) had concordant and discordant results, respectively. Two polyps were inconclusively diagnosed on CLE. On offline examination, concordance with histopathology was observed in 85.4% (n = 41) of polyps, which was marginally better than online examination, though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.45). On comparing the real-time and offline findings of CLE, concordance was found in 91.7% of the cases. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values on real-time evaluation were 83.3%, 87.5%, 79.1%, 80.7%, and 86.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CLE is a useful tool for prediction of histology to assess the polypoidal lesions of the GI tract, and it may avoid polypectomy at least in some patients.

摘要

背景

共聚焦激光内镜检查(CLE)有对肿瘤性息肉样病变进行光学诊断的潜力,并且在提议的“诊断并排除法”中可能取代传统组织学检查。本研究旨在评估基于探头的CLE在体内切除胃肠道(GI)息肉样病变前预测其组织学的准确性。

方法

在这项前瞻性单中心研究中,纳入了上消化道和/或下消化道有息肉样病变的患者。用白光内镜检测到息肉样病变后,进行基于探头的CLE检查。根据迈阿密分类法对息肉样病变进行实时和离线的推测性CLE诊断,并与作为金标准的组织病理学进行比较。

结果

共评估了50例患者(28例男性)的50个胃肠道息肉。息肉的平均(±标准差)大小为13.7(±8.5)mm。大多数息肉位于盲肠(24.0%)或胃(24.0%)。组织学检查发现,增生性息肉、腺瘤性息肉、腺癌和脂肪瘤分别见于54%、26%、18%和2%的患者。将实时CLE检查结果与组织病理学结果进行比较,40例(83.3%)结果一致,8例(16.7%)结果不一致。有2个息肉在CLE检查中诊断不明确。离线检查时,85.4%(n = 41)的息肉与组织病理学结果一致,略优于在线检查,尽管差异无统计学意义(p = 0.45)。比较CLE的实时和离线检查结果,91.7%的病例结果一致。实时评估时的准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为83.3%、87.5%、79.1%、80.7%和86.3%。

结论

CLE是预测组织学以评估胃肠道息肉样病变的有用工具,并且至少在某些患者中可能避免息肉切除术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验