Pius-Hospital, University Medicine Oldenburg, Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Department Internal Medicine-Oncology, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany.
ICON plc., Vancouver, V6B 1P1, Canada.
Lung Cancer. 2019 Sep;135:196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
Platinum-based chemotherapy is the mainstay of first-line (1L) therapy for advanced non-small cell cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the relative efficacy, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of carboplatin- versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy in 1L NSCLC.
A meta-analysis by the Cochrane group (2013) was updated. Systematic searches of CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences database, clinicaltrials.gov and conference proceedings were conducted to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2013-January 2018 which compared carboplatin and cisplatin combined with: gemcitabine, vinorelbine, docetaxel, paclitaxel, irinotecan, or pemetrexed. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), one-year OS, objective response rate (ORR), grade 3/4 drug-related toxicities, and HRQoL.
Twelve RCTs (2,048 patients) were identified from 4,139 records for inclusion in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in OS (hazards ratio [HR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96, 1.21) and one-year OS (relative risk [RR]: 0.97, CI: 0.89, 1.07) between carboplatin- and cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A small effect on ORR favouring cisplatin was detected (RR = 0.88; CI: 0.78, 0.99). Differences in drug-related toxicities were observed between carboplatin- and cisplatin-based chemotherapy for thrombocytopenia, anaemia, neurotoxicity, and the risk of nausea/vomiting. Three RCTs comparing HRQoL between carboplatin- and cisplatin-based chemotherapy found no significant differences.
This updated evidence base corroborates findings of previous meta-analyses showing no difference in OS between carboplatin- and cisplatin-based chemotherapy, despite a slight benefit in ORR for cisplatin. Toxicity profiles should be considered alongside patients' comorbidities in the choice of therapy.
含铂化疗是晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)一线治疗的主要方法。本研究旨在评估卡铂与顺铂为基础的化疗在晚期 NSCLC 一线治疗中的相对疗效、安全性和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。
更新了 Cochrane 小组(2013 年)的荟萃分析。对 CENTRAL、Medline、Embase、拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学数据库、clinicaltrials.gov 和会议论文集进行了系统检索,以纳入 2013 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月期间发表的比较卡铂和顺铂联合吉西他滨、长春瑞滨、多西他赛、紫杉醇、伊立替康或培美曲塞治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。终点包括总生存期(OS)、一年 OS、客观缓解率(ORR)、3/4 级药物相关毒性和 HRQoL。
从 4139 篇文献中检索到 12 项 RCT(2048 例患者)纳入荟萃分析。卡铂和顺铂为基础的化疗在 OS(风险比 [HR]:1.08,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.96,1.21)和一年 OS(相对风险 [RR]:0.97,CI:0.89,1.07)方面无显著差异。发现顺铂对 ORR 有轻微影响(RR=0.88;CI:0.78,0.99)。卡铂和顺铂为基础的化疗在血小板减少症、贫血、神经毒性和恶心/呕吐风险方面存在药物相关毒性差异。三项比较卡铂和顺铂为基础的化疗 HRQoL 的 RCT 发现无显著差异。
本研究更新的证据基础证实了以前荟萃分析的结果,即卡铂与顺铂为基础的化疗在 OS 方面无差异,尽管顺铂的 ORR 略有提高。在选择治疗方法时,应考虑毒性作用谱,并结合患者的合并症。