Suppr超能文献

发展基于理论和证据的咨询服务以促进健康干预:讨论文件。

Developing theory- and evidence-based counseling for a health promotion intervention: A discussion paper.

机构信息

Tampere University, FI-33014 Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 00032 Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 18, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jan;103(1):234-239. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Aug 16.

Abstract

Although the use of theories and evidence is often stressed in the development of health promotion interventions, this does not guarantee the success of an intervention. Thus, we need to reflect on intervention development processes that use different types of theories and evidence. In this paper, we provide a reflective discussion on how we identified evidence-based behavior change techniques and counseling themes for a health promotion intervention. In addition, we discuss the challenges that we encountered and what we learned during the process: a) a lack of previous research and meta-analyses, b) inconsistencies in evidence, c) integrating evidence and theories that have different starting points, and d) collaborating with researchers who represent different evidence and theories. During the process, we benefitted from having the clear goal of conducting evidence- and theory-based work. We solved the challenges by, for example, utilizing different types of evidence and being reflective about the reasons behind any inconsistencies in the evidence. In retrospect, we would have benefitted from closer collaboration between the teams that worked separately with different evidence. These kinds of reflective descriptions of development processes and the challenges encountered during them may help other researchers and professionals avoid encountering the same challenges.

摘要

虽然在制定健康促进干预措施时经常强调使用理论和证据,但这并不能保证干预措施的成功。因此,我们需要反思使用不同类型的理论和证据的干预措施制定过程。在本文中,我们提供了一个反思性讨论,说明我们如何为健康促进干预措施确定基于证据的行为改变技术和咨询主题。此外,我们还讨论了在这个过程中我们遇到的挑战以及我们从中获得的经验教训:a)缺乏先前的研究和荟萃分析,b)证据不一致,c)整合具有不同起点的证据和理论,d)与代表不同证据和理论的研究人员合作。在这个过程中,我们明确了进行基于证据和理论的工作的目标,这使我们受益。我们通过利用不同类型的证据并对证据中的任何不一致之处的原因进行反思等方法解决了这些挑战。回想起来,如果分别处理不同证据的团队之间能够进行更紧密的合作,我们会受益更多。对这些发展过程以及在这些过程中遇到的挑战进行反思性描述,可能有助于其他研究人员和专业人员避免遇到相同的挑战。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验