Grossman David C, Elder Randy W
Group Health Cooperative, Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington;.
Community Guide Branch, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Sep;49(3 Suppl 2):S174-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.06.003.
This paper highlights the collaboration and alignment between topics and recommendations related to behavioral counseling interventions from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF). Although the scope and mandates of the USPSTF and CPSTF differ, there are many similarities in the methods and approaches used to select topics and make recommendations to their key stakeholders. Behavioral counseling recommendations represent an important domain for both Task Forces, given the importance of behavior change in promoting healthful lifestyles. This paper explores opportunities for greater alignment between the two Task Forces and compares and contrasts the groups and their current approaches to making recommendations that involve behavioral counseling interventions. Opportunities to enhance behavioral counseling preventive services through closer coordination when developing and disseminating recommendations as well as future collaboration between the USPSTF and CPSTF are discussed.
本文重点介绍了美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)和社区预防服务工作组(CPSTF)在行为咨询干预相关主题与建议方面的合作与一致性。尽管USPSTF和CPSTF的范围和任务不同,但在选择主题以及向其主要利益相关者提出建议时所使用的方法和途径存在许多相似之处。鉴于行为改变在促进健康生活方式方面的重要性,行为咨询建议对两个工作组而言都是一个重要领域。本文探讨了两个工作组之间实现更大一致性的机会,并比较和对比了这两个组织及其目前提出涉及行为咨询干预建议的方法。文中还讨论了在制定和传播建议时通过更紧密协调来加强行为咨询预防服务的机会,以及USPSTF和CPSTF未来的合作。