Department of Emergency Medicine, Emek Medical Center, Clalit Health Services, Afula, Israel.
Palliative Care Unit, Emek Medical Center, Clalit Health Services, Afula, Israel.
Injury. 2019 Nov;50(11):1944-1951. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.08.022. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
Improved pain assessment and management in the emergency department (ED) is warranted. We aimed to determine the impact on pain management, of adding symptoms and signs to pain assessment.
A single center before-and-after study was conducted, supplemented by an interrupted time series analysis. The intervention included the addition of clinical presentation (CP) of the injury and facial expression (FE) of the patient to pain assessment scales of patients with soft tissue injures. Pain intensity was categorized as: mild, moderate, and severe. We compared types of pain relief medications, use of strong opioids, and pain relief efficacy between pre and post intervention phases.
Before-and-after analysis revealed a significant reduction in the use of strong opioids. The adjusted relative ratio for the use of strong opioids in the post intervention phase was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.48-0.82). This reduction was mostly driven by less use of strong opioids in patients reporting severe pain (from 17.3%-7.9%) (P < 0.0001). A larger proportion of patients in the post intervention phase than in the pre intervention phase received weak opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (27.4% vs 19.1%, P = 0.002), and a larger proportion did not receive any pain relief medication (19.8% vs 10.5%, p < 0.0001). The use of strong opioids increased with higher levels of FE and CP. Among patients with mild injury and reporting severe pain, the odds of receiving a strong opioid was nearly 9 times (OR = 8.9, 95% CI: 4.0-19.6) higher among those who were with an unrelaxed FE and showed pain behavior than those with relaxed FE. Interrupted time-series analysis showed that the mean ΔVAS (VAS score at entry minus VAS score at discharge) in the post intervention phase compared with the pre intervention phase was not statistically significant (P = 0.073). The use of strong opioids in the post intervention phase was significantly reduced (P = 0.017).
Adding symptoms and signs to pain assessment of patients admitted with soft tissue injuries decreased the use of strong opioids, without affecting pain relief efficacy.
有必要改善急诊科(ED)的疼痛评估和管理。我们旨在确定将损伤的临床表现(CP)和患者的面部表情(FE)添加到疼痛评估量表中对疼痛管理的影响。
进行了一项单中心前后研究,并补充了中断时间序列分析。干预措施包括将软组织损伤患者的疼痛评估量表中添加损伤的临床表现和患者的面部表情。疼痛强度分为:轻度、中度和重度。我们比较了干预前后阶段的止痛药类型、强阿片类药物的使用以及疼痛缓解效果。
前后分析显示,强阿片类药物的使用显著减少。干预后阶段强阿片类药物使用的调整相对比值为 0.63(95%CI:0.48-0.82)。这种减少主要是由于报告重度疼痛的患者强阿片类药物使用减少(从 17.3%-7.9%)(P<0.0001)。与干预前阶段相比,干预后阶段有更多的患者接受弱阿片类药物和非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)(27.4%比 19.1%,P=0.002),更多的患者未接受任何止痛药物(19.8%比 10.5%,P<0.0001)。FE 和 CP 水平较高的患者使用强阿片类药物的比例增加。对于轻度损伤且报告重度疼痛的患者,与面部表情放松且无疼痛行为的患者相比,FE 紧张且有疼痛行为的患者接受强阿片类药物的可能性几乎高 9 倍(OR=8.9,95%CI:4.0-19.6)。中断时间序列分析显示,与干预前阶段相比,干预后阶段的平均ΔVAS(入院时 VAS 评分减去出院时 VAS 评分)无统计学意义(P=0.073)。干预后阶段强阿片类药物的使用明显减少(P=0.017)。
在接受软组织损伤入院的患者的疼痛评估中添加症状和体征可减少强阿片类药物的使用,而不会影响疼痛缓解效果。