• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多酚丸用于心血管疾病一级和二级预防的效果(PolyIran):一项实用、整群随机试验。

Effectiveness of polypill for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (PolyIran): a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial.

机构信息

Digestive Disease Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran.

Digestive Disease Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Digestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Lancet. 2019 Aug 24;394(10199):672-683. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31791-X.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31791-X
PMID:31448738
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A fixed-dose combination therapy (polypill strategy) has been proposed as an approach to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease, especially in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). The PolyIran study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of a four-component polypill including aspirin, atorvastatin, hydrochlorothiazide, and either enalapril or valsartan for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

The PolyIran study was a two-group, pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial nested within the Golestan Cohort Study (GCS), a cohort study with 50 045 participants aged 40-75 years from the Golestan province in Iran. Clusters (villages) were randomly allocated (1:1) to either a package of non-pharmacological preventive interventions alone (minimal care group) or together with a once-daily polypill tablet (polypill group). Randomisation was stratified by three districts (Gonbad, Aq-Qala, and Kalaleh), with the village as the unit of randomisation. We used a balanced randomisation algorithm, considering block sizes of 20 and balancing for cluster size or natural log of the cluster size (depending on the skewness within strata). Randomisation was done at a fixed point in time (Jan 18, 2011) by statisticians at the University of Birmingham (Birmingham, UK), independent of the local study team. The non-pharmacological preventive interventions (including educational training about healthy lifestyle-eg, healthy diet with low salt, sugar, and fat content, exercise, weight control, and abstinence from smoking and opium) were delivered by the PolyIran field visit team at months 3 and 6, and then every 6 months thereafter. Two formulations of polypill tablet were used in this study. Participants were first prescribed polypill one (hydrochlorothiazide 12·5 mg, aspirin 81 mg, atorvastatin 20 mg, and enalapril 5 mg). Participants who developed cough during follow-up were switched by a trained study physician to polypill two, which included valsartan 40 mg instead of enalapril 5 mg. Participants were followed up for 60 months. The primary outcome-occurrence of major cardiovascular events (including hospitalisation for acute coronary syndrome, fatal myocardial infarction, sudden death, heart failure, coronary artery revascularisation procedures, and non-fatal and fatal stroke)-was centrally assessed by the GCS follow-up team, who were masked to allocation status. We did intention-to-treat analyses by including all participants who met eligibility criteria in the two study groups. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01271985.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 22, 2011, and April 15, 2013, we enrolled 6838 individuals into the study-3417 (in 116 clusters) in the minimal care group and 3421 (in 120 clusters) in the polypill group. 1761 (51·5%) of 3421 participants in the polypill group were women, as were 1679 (49·1%) of 3417 participants in the minimal care group. Median adherence to polypill tablets was 80·5% (IQR 48·5-92·2). During follow-up, 301 (8·8%) of 3417 participants in the minimal care group had major cardiovascular events compared with 202 (5·9%) of 3421 participants in the polypill group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·66, 95% CI 0·55-0·80). We found no statistically significant interaction with the presence (HR 0·61, 95% CI 0·49-0·75) or absence of pre-existing cardiovascular disease (0·80; 0·51-1·12; p=0·19). When restricted to participants in the polypill group with high adherence, the reduction in the risk of major cardiovascular events was even greater compared with the minimal care group (adjusted HR 0·43, 95% CI 0·33-0·55). The frequency of adverse events was similar between the two study groups. 21 intracranial haemorrhages were reported during the 5 years of follow-up-ten participants in the polypill group and 11 participants in the minimal care group. There were 13 physician-confirmed diagnoses of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the polypill group and nine in the minimal care group.

INTERPRETATION

Use of polypill was effective in preventing major cardiovascular events. Medication adherence was high and adverse event numbers were low. The polypill strategy could be considered as an additional effective component in controlling cardiovascular diseases, especially in LMICs.

FUNDING

Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Barakat Foundation, and Alborz Darou.

摘要

背景

固定剂量联合治疗(复方药策略)已被提议用于降低心血管疾病的负担,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。PolyIran 研究旨在评估包括阿司匹林、阿托伐他汀、氢氯噻嗪、依那普利或缬沙坦在内的四组分复方药在一级和二级预防心血管疾病方面的有效性和安全性。

方法

PolyIran 研究是一项两组成、实用、聚类随机试验,嵌套在 Golestan 队列研究(GCS)中,该队列研究有 50045 名年龄在 40-75 岁的参与者,来自伊朗的戈勒斯坦省。通过将(村庄)聚类随机分配(1:1)至非药物预防干预措施的单一方案组(最小护理组)或与每日一次的复方药片一起(复方药组)。随机分配按三个区(Gonbad、Aq-Qala 和 Kalaleh)分层,以村庄为单位进行随机分配。我们使用了平衡随机分配算法,考虑了大小为 20 的块大小,并平衡了聚类大小或聚类大小的自然对数(取决于层内的偏度)。随机分配是在固定的时间点(2011 年 1 月 18 日)由英国伯明翰大学的统计学家完成的,与当地研究小组无关。非药物预防干预措施(包括关于健康生活方式的教育培训,例如低盐、低糖、低脂肪的健康饮食、运动、体重控制以及戒烟和禁鸦片)在第 3 个月和第 6 个月由 PolyIran 现场访问团队提供,然后每 6 个月提供一次。该研究使用了两种复方药片配方。参与者首先被开处方服用复方药一(氢氯噻嗪 12.5mg、阿司匹林 81mg、阿托伐他汀 20mg 和依那普利 5mg)。在随访期间出现咳嗽的参与者由经过培训的研究医生转换为复方药二,其中包含缬沙坦 40mg 代替依那普利 5mg。参与者随访 60 个月。主要心血管事件(包括因急性冠状动脉综合征住院、致命性心肌梗死、猝死、心力衰竭、冠状动脉血运重建术以及非致死性和致死性中风)的发生是由 GCS 随访团队进行中心评估的,该团队对分配情况进行了盲法评估。我们通过包括两组研究中符合资格标准的所有参与者进行了意向治疗分析。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01271985。

结果

2011 年 2 月 22 日至 2013 年 4 月 15 日期间,我们共招募了 6838 名参与者进入研究-最小护理组 3417 名(116 个聚类),复方药组 3421 名(120 个聚类)。在复方药组的 3421 名参与者中,有 1761 名(51.5%)为女性,最小护理组的 3417 名参与者中有 1679 名(49.1%)为女性。服用复方药片的中位依从性为 80.5%(IQR 48.5-92.2)。在随访期间,最小护理组的 3417 名参与者中有 301 名(8.8%)发生了主要心血管事件,而复方药组的 3421 名参与者中有 202 名(5.9%)(校正后的危险比[HR]0.66,95%CI0.55-0.80)。我们没有发现存在(HR0.61,95%CI0.49-0.75)或不存在(0.80;0.51-1.12;p=0.19)先前存在的心血管疾病与主要心血管事件发生之间存在统计学显著交互作用。当限制在服用复方药且依从性高的参与者中时,与最小护理组相比,主要心血管事件的风险降低更大(校正后的 HR0.43,95%CI0.33-0.55)。两组研究中不良事件的发生频率相似。在 5 年的随访期间报告了 21 例颅内出血-10 例在复方药组,11 例在最小护理组。复方药组有 13 例经医生确诊的上消化道出血,最小护理组有 9 例。

解释

复方药的使用在预防主要心血管事件方面是有效的。药物的依从性很高,不良事件的数量也很低。复方药策略可被视为控制心血管疾病的另一种有效手段,特别是在 LMICs。

资金

德黑兰大学医学科学、Barakat 基金会和 Alborz Darou。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of polypill for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (PolyIran): a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial.多酚丸用于心血管疾病一级和二级预防的效果(PolyIran):一项实用、整群随机试验。
Lancet. 2019 Aug 24;394(10199):672-683. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31791-X.
2
Polypill for the prevention of cardiovascular disease (PolyIran): study design and rationale for a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.用于预防心血管疾病的复方制剂(PolyIran):一项实用整群随机对照试验的研究设计与原理
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Dec;22(12):1609-17. doi: 10.1177/2047487314550803. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
3
Effectiveness of Polypill for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease (PolyPars): Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.多酚丸预防心血管疾病的有效性研究(PolyPars):一项随机对照试验方案。
Arch Iran Med. 2020 Aug 1;23(8):548-556. doi: 10.34172/aim.2020.58.
4
Effectiveness of polypill for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial (PolyPars).多酚丸用于心血管疾病一级和二级预防的效果:一项实用的集群随机对照试验 (PolyPars)。
Heart. 2024 Jun 25;110(14):940-946. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323614.
5
PolyPill for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in an Urban Iranian Population with Special Focus on Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial within a Cohort (PolyIran - Liver) - Study Protocol.用于预防伊朗城市人群心血管疾病的复方药丸,特别关注非酒精性脂肪性肝炎:一项队列中的实用随机对照试验(PolyIran - Liver)——研究方案
Arch Iran Med. 2015 Aug;18(8):515-23.
6
Polypill with or without Aspirin in Persons without Cardiovascular Disease.无心血管疾病人群中使用含或不含阿司匹林的复方药。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 21;384(3):216-228. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2028220. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
7
Preventive Effects of a CVD Polypill on Developing Diabetes Among Patients With Metabolic Syndrome: Results of the PolyIran-Liver Trial.代谢综合征患者服用 CVD 复方药对预防糖尿病的影响:PolyIran-Liver 试验结果。
Arch Iran Med. 2024 Oct 1;27(10):538-544. doi: 10.34172/aim.31839.
8
A pragmatic randomized trial of a polypill-based strategy to improve use of indicated preventive treatments in people at high cardiovascular disease risk.一项基于复方药丸策略改善高危心血管疾病人群接受既定预防治疗的实用随机试验。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Jul;22(7):920-30. doi: 10.1177/2047487314530382. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
9
Fixed-dose combination therapy for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.用于预防动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的固定剂量联合疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 6;3(3):CD009868. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009868.pub3.
10
Fixed-dose combination therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.用于预防心血管疾病的固定剂量复方疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 16;4(4):CD009868. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009868.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Polypill in heart failure: a pathway to simplified treatment and improved adherence and outcomes.心力衰竭中的复方制剂:通往简化治疗、提高依从性及改善结局的途径。
Heart Fail Rev. 2025 Sep 6. doi: 10.1007/s10741-025-10559-2.
2
Polypill Strategies for Cardiovascular Prevention in Older Adults: Evidence, Opportunities, and Implementation Challenges.老年人心血管疾病预防的多效药丸策略:证据、机遇与实施挑战
Drugs Aging. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s40266-025-01243-z.
3
WHF Roadmap on Single Pill Combination Therapies.世界心力衰竭学会单一片剂联合疗法路线图
Glob Heart. 2025 Aug 29;20(1):73. doi: 10.5334/gh.1457. eCollection 2025.
4
The Future of Chronic Kidney Disease Treatment: Combination Therapy (Polypill) or Biomarker-Guided Personalized Intervention?慢性肾脏病治疗的未来:联合治疗(复方制剂)还是生物标志物引导的个性化干预?
Biomolecules. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):809. doi: 10.3390/biom15060809.
5
Efficacy of different polypill combinations for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同复方制剂组合用于原发性和继发性心血管疾病预防的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 9;12:1558579. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1558579. eCollection 2025.
6
Interventions to improve adherence to lipid-lowering drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.改善降脂药物依从性的干预措施:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 May 26;84:103270. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103270. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Nonadherence to Medication: The Overlooked But Critical Concern for Physicians.药物治疗不依从性:医生忽视但至关重要的问题。
JACC Asia. 2025 Jun;5(6):769-770. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.05.001.
8
A comparative analysis on the latest international and local guidelines for the management of hypertension.高血压管理的最新国际和本地指南的比较分析
Singapore Med J. 2025 May 1;66(5):240-243. doi: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-094. Epub 2025 May 19.
9
Barriers to medication adherence for secondary stroke prevention in rural communities in Cameroon: a qualitative study.喀麦隆农村社区二级卒中预防中药物依从性的障碍:一项定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Apr 24;26(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02842-w.
10
Reducing premature mortality from cardiovascular diseases in low and middle income countries: The role of Polypill in public health policy.降低低收入和中等收入国家心血管疾病的过早死亡率:复方药丸在公共卫生政策中的作用。
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025 Apr 3;25:200400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200400. eCollection 2025 Jun.