Suppr超能文献

舒噻美辅助治疗癫痫。

Sulthiame add-on therapy for epilepsy.

作者信息

Bresnahan Rebecca, Martin-McGill Kirsty J, Milburn-McNulty Philip, Powell Graham, Sills Graeme J, Marson Anthony G

机构信息

Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Lower Lane, Liverpool, UK, L9 7LJ.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 27;8(8):CD009472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009472.pub4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 10. Epilepsy is a common neurological condition, characterised by recurrent seizures. Most people respond to conventional antiepileptic drugs, however, around 30% will continue to experience seizures, despite treatment with multiple antiepileptic drugs. Sulthiame, also known as sultiame, is a widely used antiepileptic drug in Europe and Israel. We present a summary of the evidence for the use of sulthiame as add-on therapy in epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and tolerability of sulthiame as add-on therapy for people with epilepsy of any aetiology compared with placebo or another antiepileptic drug.

SEARCH METHODS

For the latest update, we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), which includes the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register and CENTRAL (17 January 2019), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to January 16, 2019), ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP Search Portal (17 January 2019). We imposed no language restrictions. We contacted the manufacturers of sulthiame, and researchers in the field to seek any ongoing or unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of add-on sulthiame, with any level of blinding (single, double or unblinded) in people of any age, with epilepsy of any aetiology.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, and extracted relevant data. We assessed these outcomes: (1) 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency between baseline and end of follow-up; (2) complete cessation of seizures during follow-up; (3) mean seizure frequency; (4) time-to-treatment withdrawal; (5) adverse effects; and (6) quality of life. We used intention-to-treat for primary analyses. We presented results as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). However, due to the paucity of trials, we mainly conducted a narrative analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

We included one placebo-controlled trial that recruited 37 infants with newly diagnosed West syndrome. This trial was funded by DESITIN Pharma, Germany. During the study, sulthiame was given as an add-on therapy to pyridoxine. No data were reported for the outcomes: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency between baseline and end of follow-up; mean seizure frequency; or quality of life. For complete cessation of seizures during a nine-day follow-up period for add-on sulthiame versus placebo, the RR was 11.14 (95% CI 0.67 to 184.47; very low-certainty evidence), however, this difference was not shown to be statistically significant (P = 0.09). The number of infants experiencing one or more adverse events was not significantly different between the two treatment groups (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.64; very low-certainty evidence; P = 0.63). Somnolence was more prevalent amongst infants randomised to add-on sulthiame compared to placebo, but again, the difference was not statistically significant (RR 3.40, 95% CI 0.42 to 27.59; very low-certainty evidence; P = 0.25). We were unable to conduct meaningful analysis of time-to-treatment withdrawal and adverse effects due to incomplete data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Sulthiame may lead to a cessation of seizures when used as an add-on therapy to pyridoxine in infants with West syndrome, however, we are very uncertain about the reliability of this finding. The included study was small and had a significant risk of bias, largely due to the lack of details regarding blinding and the incomplete reporting of outcomes. Both issues negatively impacted the certainty of the evidence. No conclusions can be drawn about the occurrence of adverse effects, change in quality of life, or mean reduction in seizure frequency. No evidence exists for the use of sulthiame as an add-on therapy in people with epilepsy outside West syndrome.Large, multi-centre randomised controlled trials are needed to inform clinical practice, if sulthiame is to be used as an add-on therapy for epilepsy.

摘要

背景

这是对先前发表于《Cochrane系统评价数据库》2015年第10期的Cochrane系统评价的更新版本。癫痫是一种常见的神经系统疾病,其特征为反复发作的癫痫发作。大多数人对传统抗癫痫药物有反应,然而,约30%的患者尽管接受了多种抗癫痫药物治疗,仍会继续发作。舒噻美,也称为硫噻嗪,在欧洲和以色列是一种广泛使用的抗癫痫药物。我们总结了将舒噻美作为癫痫附加治疗的证据。

目的

评估与安慰剂或另一种抗癫痫药物相比,舒噻美作为附加治疗对任何病因的癫痫患者的疗效和耐受性。

检索方法

为进行最新更新,我们检索了Cochrane研究注册库(CRS网络版),其中包括Cochrane癫痫组专业注册库和CENTRAL(2019年1月17日)、MEDLINE Ovid(1946年至2019年1月16日)、ClinicalTrials.gov和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(2019年1月17日)。我们未设语言限制。我们联系了舒噻美的制造商以及该领域的研究人员,以查找任何正在进行或未发表的研究。

入选标准

舒噻美附加治疗的随机对照试验,对任何年龄、任何病因的癫痫患者采用任何程度的盲法(单盲、双盲或非盲)。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立选择纳入试验,并提取相关数据。我们评估了以下结局:(1)基线至随访结束时癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多;(2)随访期间癫痫发作完全停止;(3)平均癫痫发作频率;(4)治疗撤药时间;(5)不良反应;(6)生活质量。我们采用意向性分析进行主要分析。我们将结果表示为风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)。然而,由于试验数量较少,我们主要进行了描述性分析。

主要结果

我们纳入了一项安慰剂对照试验,该试验招募了37例新诊断为West综合征的婴儿。该试验由德国DESITIN制药公司资助。在研究期间,舒噻美作为吡哆醇的附加治疗药物。未报告以下结局的数据:基线至随访结束时癫痫发作频率降低50%或更多;平均癫痫发作频率;或生活质量。对于附加舒噻美与安慰剂相比在9天随访期内癫痫发作完全停止的情况,RR为11.14(95%CI 0.67至184.47;极低确定性证据),然而,该差异未显示具有统计学意义(P = 0.09)。两个治疗组中发生一种或多种不良事件的婴儿数量无显著差异(RR 0.85,95%CI 0.44至1.64;极低确定性证据;P = 0.63)。与安慰剂相比,随机接受附加舒噻美的婴儿中嗜睡更为普遍,但同样,差异无统计学意义(RR 3.40,95%CI 0.42至27.59;极低确定性证据;P = 补0.25)。由于数据不完整,我们无法对治疗撤药时间和不良反应进行有意义的分析。

作者结论

在患有West综合征的婴儿中,舒噻美作为吡哆醇的附加治疗可能会导致癫痫发作停止,然而,我们对这一发现的可靠性非常不确定。纳入的研究规模较小且存在显著的偏倚风险,主要原因是缺乏关于盲法的细节以及结局报告不完整。这两个问题均对证据的确定性产生了负面影响。关于不良反应的发生、生活质量的变化或癫痫发作频率的平均降低情况,无法得出任何结论。对于West综合征以外的癫痫患者,没有证据表明舒噻美可作为附加治疗药物。如果要将舒噻美作为癫痫的附加治疗药物,需要进行大型、多中心随机对照试验以指导临床实践。

相似文献

1
Sulthiame add-on therapy for epilepsy.舒噻美辅助治疗癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 27;8(8):CD009472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009472.pub4.
2
Sulthiame add-on therapy for epilepsy.舒噻美辅助治疗癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 28(10):CD009472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009472.pub3.
3
Sulthiame add-on therapy for epilepsy.舒噻美辅助治疗癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD009472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009472.pub2.
4
Sulthiame monotherapy for epilepsy.硫喷妥钠单药治疗癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 23;9(9):CD010062. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010062.pub3.
5
Pregabalin add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.普瑞巴林添加治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD005612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005612.pub5.
6
Pregabalin add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.加用普瑞巴林治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 9;7(7):CD005612. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005612.pub4.
7
Lamotrigine add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.拉莫三嗪附加疗法治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 20;3(3):CD001909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001909.pub3.
9
Brivaracetam add-on therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy.添加布瓦西坦治疗耐药性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 14;3(3):CD011501. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011501.pub3.
10
Felbamate add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.非氨酯添加疗法用于耐药性局灶性癫痫
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 1;8(8):CD008295. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008295.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
Sulthiame monotherapy for epilepsy.硫喷妥钠单药治疗癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 23;9(9):CD010062. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010062.pub3.

本文引用的文献

5
Sulthiame add-on therapy for epilepsy.舒噻美辅助治疗癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 28(10):CD009472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009472.pub3.
7
Sulthiame add-on therapy for epilepsy.舒噻美辅助治疗癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD009472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009472.pub2.
9
Respiratory alkalosis and metabolic acidosis in a child treated with sulthiame.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Oct;26(10):752-3. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181f39b4b.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验