Suppr超能文献

合理的联合治疗胆碱能发作。

Rational polytherapy in the treatment of cholinergic seizures.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Epilepsy Research Laboratory (151), Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Neuroscience Department, US Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense (USAMRICD), 8350 Ricketts Point Rd., Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010, USA.

出版信息

Neurobiol Dis. 2020 Jan;133:104537. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104537. Epub 2019 Aug 24.

Abstract

The initiation and maintenance phases of cholinergic status epilepticus (SE) are associated with maladaptive trafficking of synaptic GABA and glutamate receptors. The resulting pharmacoresistance reflects a decrease in synaptic GABA receptors and increase in NMDA and AMPA receptors, which tilt the balance between inhibition and excitation in favor of the latter. If these changes are important to the pathophysiology of SE, both should be treated, and blocking their consequences should have therapeutic potential. We used a model of benzodiazepine-refractory SE (RSE) (Tetz et al., 2006) and a model of soman-induced SE to test this hypothesis. Treatment of RSE with combinations of the GABAR agonists midazolam or diazepam and the NMDAR antagonists MK-801 or ketamine terminated RSE unresponsive to high-dose monotherapy with benzodiazepines, ketamine or other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). It also reduced RSE-associated neuronal injury, spatial memory deficits and the occurrence of spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRS), tested several weeks after SE. Treatment of sc soman-induced SE similarly showed much greater reduction of EEG power by a combination of midazolam with ketamine, compared to midazolam monotherapy. When treating late (40 min after seizure onset), there may not be enough synaptic GABAR left to be able to restore inhibition with maximal GABAR stimulation, and further benefit is derived from the addition of an AED which increases inhibition or reduces excitation by a non-GABAergic mechanism. The midazolam-ketamine-valproate combination is effective in terminating RSE. 3-D isobolograms demonstrate positive cooperativity between midazolam, ketamine and valproate, without any interaction between the toxicity of these drugs, so that the therapeutic index is increased by combination therapy between GABAR agonist, NMDAR antagonist and selective AEDs. We compared this drug combination based on the receptor trafficking hypothesis to treatments based on clinical practice. The midazolam-ketamine-valproate combination is far more effective in stopping RSE than the midazolam-fosphenytoin-valproate combination inspired from clinical guidelines. Furthermore, sequential administration of midazolam, ketamine and valproate is far less effective than simultaneous treatment with the same drugs at the same dose. These data suggest that we should re-evaluate our traditional treatment of RSE, and that treatment should be based on pathophysiology. The search for a better drug has to deal with the fact that most monotherapy leaves half the problem untreated. The search for a better benzodiazepine should acknowledge the main cause of pharmacoresistance, which is loss of synaptic GABAR. Future clinical trials should consider treating both the failure of inhibition and the runaway excitation which characterize RSE, and should include an early polytherapy arm.

摘要

胆碱能状态性癫痫发作(SE)的起始和维持阶段与突触 GABA 和谷氨酸受体的适应性运输有关。由此产生的药物抵抗反映了突触 GABA 受体的减少和 NMDA 和 AMPA 受体的增加,这使得抑制和兴奋之间的平衡有利于后者。如果这些变化对 SE 的病理生理学很重要,那么两者都应该得到治疗,并且阻断它们的后果应该具有治疗潜力。我们使用苯二氮䓬类药物难治性 SE(RSE)(Tetz 等人,2006 年)和梭曼诱导的 SE 模型来检验这一假设。用 GABAR 激动剂咪达唑仑或地西泮与 NMDAR 拮抗剂 MK-801 或氯胺酮的组合治疗 RSE,终止了对高剂量苯二氮䓬类药物、氯胺酮或其他抗癫痫药物(AED)单药治疗无反应的 RSE。它还减少了 RSE 相关的神经元损伤、空间记忆缺陷和自发性复发性癫痫发作(SRS)的发生,在 SE 发生后几周进行测试。用咪达唑仑联合氯胺酮治疗 sc 梭曼诱导的 SE 也显示出更强的脑电图功率降低,与咪达唑仑单药治疗相比。当治疗晚期(发作后 40 分钟)时,可能没有足够的突触 GABA 留下来,无法通过最大 GABA 刺激恢复抑制,并且通过添加增加抑制或通过非 GABA 能机制减少兴奋的 AED 可以进一步获益。咪达唑仑-氯胺酮-丙戊酸钠联合治疗可有效终止 RSE。3-D 等剂量图表明咪达唑仑、氯胺酮和丙戊酸钠之间存在正协同作用,这些药物的毒性之间没有相互作用,因此联合治疗可增加 GABAR 激动剂、NMDAR 拮抗剂和选择性 AED 之间的治疗指数。我们将基于受体运输假设的这种药物组合与基于临床实践的治疗进行了比较。咪达唑仑-氯胺酮-丙戊酸钠联合治疗比基于临床指南的咪达唑仑-苯妥英钠-丙戊酸钠联合治疗更有效地停止 RSE。此外,咪达唑仑、氯胺酮和丙戊酸钠的序贯给药远不如同时以相同剂量用相同药物治疗有效。这些数据表明,我们应该重新评估我们对 RSE 的传统治疗方法,并且治疗应该基于病理生理学。寻找更好的药物必须考虑到大多数单药治疗仍有一半问题未得到解决的事实。寻找更好的苯二氮䓬类药物应该认识到药物抵抗的主要原因,即突触 GABA 的丧失。未来的临床试验应考虑同时治疗 RSE 的抑制失败和失控兴奋,并且应该包括早期的多药治疗臂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验