• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因急性恶化而接受快速反应系统激活的住院血液肿瘤患者的结局。

Outcomes of hospitalized hematologic oncology patients receiving rapid response system activation for acute deterioration.

机构信息

Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2019 Aug 27;23(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2568-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-019-2568-5
PMID:31455376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6712869/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with hematologic malignancies who are admitted to hospital are at increased risk of deterioration and death. Rapid response systems (RRSs) respond to hospitalized patients who clinically deteriorate. We sought to describe the characteristics and outcomes of hematologic oncology inpatients requiring rapid response system (RRS) activation, and to determine the prognostic accuracy of the SIRS and qSOFA criteria for in-hospital mortality of hematologic oncology patients with suspected infection.

METHODS

We used registry data from two hospitals within The Ottawa Hospital network, between 2012 and 2016. Consecutive hematologic oncology inpatients who experienced activation of the RRS were included in the study. Data was gathered at the time of RRS activation and assessment. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Logistical regression was used to evaluate for predictors of in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

We included 401 patients during the study period. In-hospital mortality for all included patients was 41.9% (168 patients), and 145 patients (45%) were admitted to ICU following RRS activation. Among patients with suspected infection at the time of RRS activation, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria had a sensitivity of 86.9% (95% CI 80.9-91.6) and a specificity of 38.2% (95% CI 31.9-44.8) for predicting in-hospital mortality, while Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) criteria had a sensitivity of 61.9% (95% CI 54.1-69.3) and a specificity of 91.4% (95% CI 87.1-94.7). Factors associated with increased in-hospital mortality included transfer to ICU after RRS activation (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.56, 95% CI 2.12-5.97) and a higher number of RRS activations (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.63-3.69). Factors associated with improved survival included active malignancy treatment at the time of RRS activation (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.86) and longer hospital length of stay (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70-0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Hematologic oncology inpatients requiring RRS activation have high rates of subsequent ICU admission and mortality. ICU admission and higher number of RRS activations are associated with increased risk of death, while active cancer treatment and longer hospital stay are associated with lower risk of mortality. Clinicians should consider these factors in risk-stratifying these patients during RRS assessment.

摘要

背景

因血液系统恶性肿瘤住院的患者有病情恶化和死亡的风险增加。快速反应系统(RRS)用于应对临床恶化的住院患者。我们旨在描述需要快速反应系统(RRS)激活的血液肿瘤住院患者的特征和结局,并确定全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)和快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)标准对疑似感染的血液肿瘤患者院内死亡率的预测准确性。

方法

我们使用了 2012 年至 2016 年期间来自渥太华医院网络内两家医院的登记数据。纳入经历 RRS 激活的连续血液肿瘤住院患者。数据在 RRS 激活和评估时收集。主要结局是院内死亡率。逻辑回归用于评估院内死亡率的预测因素。

结果

研究期间纳入了 401 名患者。所有纳入患者的院内死亡率为 41.9%(168 例),有 145 例(45%)患者在 RRS 激活后被转入 ICU。在 RRS 激活时怀疑感染的患者中,SIRS 标准预测院内死亡率的敏感性为 86.9%(95%CI 80.9-91.6),特异性为 38.2%(95%CI 31.9-44.8),而 qSOFA 标准的敏感性为 61.9%(95%CI 54.1-69.3),特异性为 91.4%(95%CI 87.1-94.7)。与院内死亡率增加相关的因素包括 RRS 激活后转入 ICU(调整后的优势比[OR]3.56,95%CI 2.12-5.97)和 RRS 激活次数增加(OR 2.45,95%CI 1.63-3.69)。与生存改善相关的因素包括 RRS 激活时进行的积极恶性肿瘤治疗(OR 0.54,95%CI 0.34-0.86)和住院时间延长(OR 0.78,95%CI 0.70-0.87)。

结论

需要 RRS 激活的血液肿瘤住院患者 ICU 入院率和死亡率均较高。ICU 入院和 RRS 激活次数增加与死亡风险增加相关,而积极的癌症治疗和住院时间延长与死亡率降低相关。临床医生在 RRS 评估时应考虑这些因素对这些患者进行风险分层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e305/6712869/0e4af069bc8a/13054_2019_2568_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e305/6712869/0e4af069bc8a/13054_2019_2568_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e305/6712869/0e4af069bc8a/13054_2019_2568_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of hospitalized hematologic oncology patients receiving rapid response system activation for acute deterioration.因急性恶化而接受快速反应系统激活的住院血液肿瘤患者的结局。
Crit Care. 2019 Aug 27;23(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2568-5.
2
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
3
Accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: a meta-analysis of observational studies.快速序贯器官衰竭评估 (qSOFA) 评分和全身性炎症反应综合征 (SIRS) 标准对疑似感染住院患者死亡率预测的准确性:观察性研究的荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Nov;24(11):1123-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.032. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
4
Validation of prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among cardiac-, thoracic-, and vascular-surgery patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit.入住心胸重症监护病房的心脏、胸科和血管手术患者中,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准及快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分对院内死亡率预后准确性的验证。
J Card Surg. 2020 Jan;35(1):118-127. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14331. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
5
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
6
The Effect of Adding Procalcitonin to the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (Sirs) and Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) Scoring System in Predicting Sepsis Mortality.将降钙素原添加到全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)和快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分系统中对预测脓毒症死亡率的影响。
Cureus. 2022 Nov 21;14(11):e31740. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31740. eCollection 2022 Nov.
7
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.qSOFA与SIRS用于预测非重症监护病房疑似脓毒症患者不良结局的比较。
Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5.
8
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.qSOFA、SIRS 标准和脓毒症定义对识别院前环境和急诊科分诊中感染风险患者的并发症的敏感性较低。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y.
9
Sepsis-3 Septic Shock Criteria and Associated Mortality Among Infected Hospitalized Patients Assessed by a Rapid Response Team.快速反应团队评估的感染住院患者中,Sepsis-3 脓毒症休克标准和相关死亡率。
Chest. 2018 Aug;154(2):309-316. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 17.
10
Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit.快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估、全身炎症反应综合征及早期预警评分用于检测重症监护病房以外感染患者的临床病情恶化
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 1;195(7):906-911. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0854OC.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes and predictors of in-hospital mortality among patients admitted to the intensive care or step-down unit after a rapid response team activation: A retrospective cohort study.快速反应小组启动后入住重症监护病房或降级病房的患者院内死亡的结局及预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 28;20(4):e0317429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317429. eCollection 2025.
2
Outcomes of Patients with Hematological Malignancies Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit at a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家三级医疗中心收治的入住重症监护病房的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的治疗结果
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2025 Jan-Mar;13(1):47-52. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_257_24. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The role of a critical care outreach service in the management of patients with haematological malignancy.重症监护外展服务在血液系统恶性肿瘤患者管理中的作用。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2019 Nov;20(4):327-334. doi: 10.1177/1751143719855201. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
2
Long-Term Outcome of Patients With a Hematologic Malignancy and Multiple Organ Failure Admitted at the Intensive Care.患有血液系统恶性肿瘤和多器官衰竭的患者在重症监护病房的长期预后。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):e120-e128. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003526.
3
Outcomes of Older Hospitalized Patients Requiring Rapid Response Team Activation for Acute Deterioration.
Sepsis and acute respiratory failure in patients with cancer: how can we improve care and outcomes even further?
癌症患者的脓毒症和急性呼吸衰竭:我们如何进一步改善护理和预后?
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023 Oct 1;29(5):472-483. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001078. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
4
Risk Factors and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Hematological Malignancies Complicated by Hospital-Acquired Infections.危重症血液病合并医院获得性感染患者的危险因素和结局。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 22;59(2):214. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020214.
5
A critical care outreach team under strain - Evaluation of the service provided to patients with haematological malignancy during the Covid-19 pandemic.在疫情期间为血液恶性肿瘤患者提供服务的重症监护外展团队——服务评估。
J Crit Care. 2022 Oct;71:154109. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154109. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
6
The association between hospital length of stay before rapid response system activation and clinical outcomes: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.快速反应系统激活前的住院时间与临床结局的关联:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
Respir Res. 2021 Feb 18;22(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01660-9.
7
Outcomes of hospitalized hematologic oncology patients receiving rapid response system activation for acute deterioration: another time, another way.因急性病情恶化而启动快速反应系统的住院血液肿瘤学患者的结局:不同时间,不同方式。
Crit Care. 2019 Dec 23;23(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2714-0.
老年住院患者因急性恶化需要快速反应团队激活的结局。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):1953-1960. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003442.
4
Sepsis-3 Septic Shock Criteria and Associated Mortality Among Infected Hospitalized Patients Assessed by a Rapid Response Team.快速反应团队评估的感染住院患者中,Sepsis-3 脓毒症休克标准和相关死亡率。
Chest. 2018 Aug;154(2):309-316. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 17.
5
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with hematologic malignancies receiving chemotherapy in the intensive care unit.在重症监护病房接受化疗的血液恶性肿瘤患者的特征和结局。
Cancer. 2018 Jul 15;124(14):3025-3036. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31409. Epub 2018 May 4.
6
Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Consequences of Recurrent Activation of a Rapid Response Team: A Multicenter Observational Study.快速反应团队再次激活的患病率、风险因素和临床后果:一项多中心观察性研究。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Oct;34(10):782-789. doi: 10.1177/0885066618773735. Epub 2018 May 2.
7
Predictors of outcome in patients with hematologic malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit.入住重症监护病房的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者预后的预测因素。
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2018 Dec;11(4):206-218. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
8
Impact of nighttime Rapid Response Team activation on outcomes of hospitalized patients with acute deterioration.夜间快速反应团队的激活对急性恶化住院患者结局的影响。
Crit Care. 2018 Mar 14;22(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2005-1.
9
Prognostic Accuracy of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Mortality in Patients With Suspected Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估对疑似感染患者死亡率的预后准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 20;168(4):266-275. doi: 10.7326/M17-2820. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
10
The influence of a change in septic shock definitions on intensive care epidemiology and outcome: comparison of sepsis-2 and sepsis-3 definitions.脓毒症休克定义的改变对重症监护流行病学和结局的影响:脓毒症 2 期和脓毒症 3 期定义的比较。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2018 Mar;50(3):207-213. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2017.1383630. Epub 2017 Sep 26.