Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hanyang University Medical Center, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Trials. 2019 Aug 28;20(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3624-9.
A classical approach to produce interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) consistently spares the posterior aspect of the shoulder and ulnar sides of the elbow, forearm, and hand, which are innervated by the lower trunk of the brachial plexus (C8-T1). As an alternative to the classical approach, a caudal approach to ISBPB successfully produces anesthesia of the ulnar sides of the elbow, forearm, and hand. However, its beneficial effects on anesthesia in the posterior aspect of the shoulder have not been investigated. In addition, the C8 nerve root is not routinely selectively blocked during ISBPB. Therefore, we will compare the C5 to C7 and C5 to C8 nerve root blocks during a caudal approach to ISBPB to assess the clinical benefit of C8 nerve blocks for the surgical anesthesia of the posterior aspect of the shoulder.
METHODS/DESIGN: In this prospective parallel-group single-blind randomized controlled trial, 74 patients scheduled to undergo arthroscopic shoulder surgery under ISBPB are randomly allocated to receive the C5 to C7 or C5 to C8 nerve root block at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is pain intensity, which is rated as 0 (no pain), 1 (mild pain), or 2 (severe pain), during the introduction of a posterior portal into the glenohumeral joint. The secondary outcomes are (1) the extent of the ipsilateral sensory, motor, hemidiaphragmatic, and stellate ganglion blockade, (2) changes in the results of a pulmonary function test, (3) incidence of complications related to ISBPB, (4) postoperative numerical pain rating scale scores, (5) patients' satisfaction with the ISBPB, (6) dose and frequency of analgesic use, and (7) incidence of conversion to general anesthesia.
This study is the first to evaluate the beneficial effects of the C8 nerve root block during ISBPB, which has rarely been performed due to the technical challenge in visualizing and blocking the C8 nerve root. It is expected that a C8 nerve root block performed during ISBPB will provide sufficient surgical anesthesia of the posterior aspect of the shoulder, which cannot be achieved by a classical approach to ISBPB.
ClicnicalTrials.gov, NCT03487874 . Registered on 4 April 2018.
经典的肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞(ISBPB)方法可始终避免肩部的后外侧和肘部、前臂和手部的尺侧,这些部位由臂丛神经的下干(C8-T1)支配。作为经典方法的替代方法,ISBPB 的尾侧入路可成功产生肘部、前臂和手部的尺侧麻醉。然而,其在肩部后外侧麻醉方面的有益效果尚未得到研究。此外,ISBPB 中常规不选择性阻滞 C8 神经根。因此,我们将比较 ISBPB 尾侧入路时 C5 至 C7 和 C5 至 C8 神经根阻滞,以评估 C8 神经根阻滞对肩部后外侧手术麻醉的临床益处。
方法/设计:在这项前瞻性平行组单盲随机对照试验中,74 例计划接受 ISBPB 下关节镜肩关节手术的患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配接受 C5 至 C7 或 C5 至 C8 神经根阻滞。主要结局是在引入盂肱关节后入路时,评为 0(无痛)、1(轻度疼痛)或 2(重度疼痛)的疼痛强度。次要结局包括:(1)同侧感觉、运动、膈神经和星状神经节阻滞的程度;(2)肺功能测试结果的变化;(3)与 ISBPB 相关的并发症发生率;(4)术后数字疼痛评分量表评分;(5)患者对 ISBPB 的满意度;(6)镇痛药的剂量和频率;(7)转为全身麻醉的发生率。
这项研究首次评估了 ISBPB 中 C8 神经根阻滞的有益效果,由于在可视化和阻滞 C8 神经根方面存在技术挑战,很少进行该操作。预计在 ISBPB 中进行 C8 神经根阻滞将提供足够的肩部后外侧手术麻醉,而经典的 ISBPB 方法无法实现。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03487874。2018 年 4 月 4 日注册。