Department of Primary Care and Public Health.
Imperial College London, London.
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Sep 26;69(687):e665-e674. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X705461. Print 2019 Oct.
Evidence suggests that pharmacists integrated into primary care can improve patient outcomes and satisfaction, but their impact on healthcare systems is unclear.
To identify the key impacts of pharmacists' integration into primary care on health system indicators, such as healthcare utilisation and costs.
A systematic review of literature.
Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, the Health Management Information Consortium, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were examined, along with reference lists of relevant studies. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies published up until June 2018, which considered health system outcomes of the integration of pharmacists into primary care, were included. The Cochrane risk of bias quality assessment tool was used to assess risk of bias for RCTs; the National Institute of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute quality assessment tool was used for observational studies. Data were extracted from published reports and findings synthesised.
Searches identified 3058 studies, of which 28 met the inclusion criteria. Most included studies were of fair quality. Pharmacists in primary care resulted in reduced use of GP appointments and reduced emergency department (ED) attendance, but increased overall primary care use. There was no impact on hospitalisations, but some evidence of savings in overall health system and medication costs.
Integrating pharmacists into primary care may reduce GP workload and ED attendance. However, further higher quality studies are needed, including research to clarify the cost-effectiveness of the intervention and the long-term impact on health system outcomes.
有证据表明,药师融入基层医疗可以改善患者的治疗效果和满意度,但他们对医疗体系的影响尚不清楚。
明确药师融入基层医疗对医疗体系指标(如医疗利用度和医疗成本)的关键影响。
文献系统性回顾。
对 Embase、MEDLINE、Scopus、健康管理信息联合会、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册数据库进行了检索,并查阅了相关研究的参考文献列表。纳入了考虑药师融入基层医疗的健康体系结果的随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究,这些研究的发表时间截至 2018 年 6 月。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险质量评估工具评估 RCT 的偏倚风险;使用美国国立卫生研究院心肺血液研究所的国家评估工具评估观察性研究的偏倚风险。从已发表的报告中提取数据并进行综合分析。
检索共确定了 3058 项研究,其中 28 项符合纳入标准。大多数纳入的研究质量为中等。基层医疗中的药师可减少全科医生就诊预约次数和急诊就诊次数,但会增加整体基层医疗就诊次数。对住院治疗没有影响,但有证据表明整体医疗体系和药物治疗成本有所节省。
将药师融入基层医疗可能会减少全科医生的工作量和急诊就诊次数。然而,还需要更多高质量的研究,包括阐明干预措施的成本效益以及对健康体系结果的长期影响的研究。