Francesconi Paolo, Ballo Piercarlo, Profili Francesco, Policardo Laura, Roti Lorenzo, Zuppiroli Alfredo
Epidemiology Unit, Regional Health Agency of Tuscany, Florence, Italy.
Cardiology Unit, S. Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Health Serv Insights. 2019 Aug 19;12:1178632919866200. doi: 10.1177/1178632919866200. eCollection 2019.
We recently investigated the prognostic impact of a Chronic Care Model (CCM)-based healthcare program applied in primary care in Tuscany Region mainly run by multidisciplinary teams composed of general practitioners (GPs) and nurses. The project included proactively planned follow-up visits for each patient, individualized counselling to optimize lifestyle modifications and adherence to appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. 1761 patients with Chronic heart failure (CHF) directly enrolled by the GPs were matched with 3522 CHF controls not involved in the project. Over a 4-year follow-up in the CCM group a higher CHF hospitalization rate was found (12.1 vs 10.3 events/100 patient-years; incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.15, p=0.0030), whereas mortality was lower (10.8 vs 12.6 events/100 patient-years; IRR 0.82, p<0.0001). The CCM status was independently associated with a 34% increase in the risk of CHF hospitalization and a 18% reduction in the risk of death (p<0.0001 for both). The CCM status was associated with a 50% increase in the rate of planned Heart failure (HF) hospitalizations whereas the rate of 1-month CHF readmissions showed no differences. Such a divergent trend could be explained by the direct involvement of GPs in the CCM program, leading them to a better awareness of patients' clinical status, and then to a more frequent use of clinical pathways and facilities, including hospitalization. It is reasonable to argue that not all hospitalizations must necessarily be considered as a poor outcome, as they often provide additional opportunities to improve therapies, optimize patient education, or define follow-up strategies. The evidence of a divergent trend between mortality and hospitalization in our population might support the clinical importance of a multidisciplinary approach for the management of patients with HF.
我们最近调查了一项基于慢性护理模式(CCM)的医疗保健项目在托斯卡纳地区初级保健中的预后影响,该项目主要由全科医生(GPs)和护士组成的多学科团队实施。该项目包括为每位患者积极规划随访就诊、提供个性化咨询以优化生活方式改变并坚持适当的诊断和治疗途径。由全科医生直接招募的1761例慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者与3522例未参与该项目的CHF对照患者进行了匹配。在CCM组4年的随访中,发现CHF住院率较高(12.1对10.3次事件/100患者年;发病率比[IRR]1.15,p = 0.0030),而死亡率较低(10.8对12.6次事件/100患者年;IRR 0.82,p<0.0001)。CCM状态与CHF住院风险增加34%和死亡风险降低18%独立相关(两者p均<0.0001)。CCM状态与计划性心力衰竭(HF)住院率增加50%相关,而1个月CHF再入院率无差异。这种不同的趋势可以通过全科医生直接参与CCM项目来解释,这使他们对患者的临床状况有了更好的认识,进而更频繁地使用临床途径和设施,包括住院治疗。有理由认为并非所有住院治疗都必然被视为不良结局,因为它们通常提供了改善治疗、优化患者教育或确定随访策略的额外机会。我们人群中死亡率和住院率之间不同趋势的证据可能支持多学科方法在HF患者管理中的临床重要性。