• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于慢性病护理模式的项目引入对医疗资源利用的影响:普利亚护理项目的结果

The effects of the introduction of a chronic care model-based program on utilization of healthcare resources: the results of the Puglia care program.

作者信息

Robusto Fabio, Bisceglia Lucia, Petrarolo Vito, Avolio Francesca, Graps Elisabetta, Attolini Ettore, Nacchiero Eleonora, Lepore Vito

机构信息

Regional Healthcare Agency of Puglia Region (AReSS Puglia), via Giovanni Gentile n 52 -, 70126, Bari, Italy.

AReSS Puglia, Bari, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 25;18(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3075-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-018-3075-0
PMID:29801489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5970509/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ageing is continuously increasing the prevalence of patients with chronic conditions, putting pressure on the sustainability of Healthcare Systems. Chronic Care Models (CCM) have been used to address the needs of frail people in the continuum of care, testifying to an improvement in health outcomes and more efficient access to healthcare services. The impact of CCM deployment has already been experienced in a selected cohort of patients affected by specific chronic illnesses. We have investigated its effects in a heterogeneous frail cohort included in a regional CCM-based program.

METHODS

a retrospective population-based cohort study was carried out involving a non-oncological cohort of adult subjects with chronic diseases included in the CCM-oriented program (Puglia Care). Individuals in usual care with comparable demographic and clinical characteristics were selected for matched pair analysis. Study cohorts were defined by using a record linkage analysis of administrative databases and electronic medical records, including data on the adult population in the 6 local area health authorities of Puglia in Italy (approximately 2 million people). The effects of Puglia Care on the utilizations of healthcare resources were evaluated both in a before-after and in a case-control analysis.

RESULTS

There were 1074 subjects included in Puglia Care and 2126 matched controls. In before-after analysis of the Puglia Care cohort, 240 unplanned hospitalizations occurred in the pre-inclusion period, while 239 were registered during follow-up. The incidence of unplanned hospitalization was 10.3 per 100 person/year (95% CI, 9.1-11.7) during follow-up and 12.1 per 100 person/year (95% CI, 10.7-13.8) in the pre-inclusion period (IRR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99). During follow-up a significant reduction in costs related to unplanned hospitalizations (IRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.91-0.92) was registered, while costs related to drugs (IRR, 1.14; p < 0.01), out-patient specialist visits (IRR, 1.19; p < 0.01), and planned hospitalization (IRR 1.03; p < 0.01) increased significantly. These modifications can be related to the aging of the population and modifications to healthcare delivery; for this reason, a case-control analysis was performed. The results testify to a significantly lower number (IRR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.91), length of hospital stay (IRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.76-0.84), and costs related to unplanned hospitalizations (IRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.80-0.80) during follow-up in the intervention group. However, there was a higher increase in costs of hospitalizations, drugs and out-patients specialist visits during follow-up in Puglia Care when compared with patients in usual care.

CONCLUSION

In a population-based cohort, inclusion of chronic patients in a CCM-based program was significantly associated with a lower recourse to unplanned hospital admissions when compared with patients in usual care with comparable clinical and demographic characteristics.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2b/5970509/f12ede1aee2c/12913_2018_3075_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2b/5970509/f12ede1aee2c/12913_2018_3075_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a2b/5970509/f12ede1aee2c/12913_2018_3075_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

老龄化使得慢性病患者的比例持续上升,给医疗保健系统的可持续性带来压力。慢性病护理模式(CCM)已被用于满足体弱患者在连续护理过程中的需求,这证明了健康状况的改善以及获得医疗服务的效率提高。CCM的应用效果已在特定慢性病患者的选定队列中得到体现。我们调查了其在一个基于区域CCM计划的异质性体弱队列中的效果。

方法

开展了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,纳入了参与以CCM为导向的计划(普利亚护理计划)的患有慢性病的非肿瘤成年受试者队列。选择具有可比人口统计学和临床特征的常规护理个体进行配对分析。通过对行政数据库和电子病历的记录链接分析来定义研究队列,包括意大利普利亚6个地方卫生当局成年人口的数据(约200万人)。在前后分析和病例对照分析中评估普利亚护理计划对医疗资源利用的影响。

结果

普利亚护理计划纳入了1074名受试者和2126名匹配对照。在普利亚护理计划队列的前后分析中,纳入前时期发生了240次非计划住院,而随访期间记录了239次。随访期间非计划住院的发生率为每100人/年10.3次(95%CI,9.1 - 11.7),纳入前时期为每100人/年12.1次(95%CI,10.7 - 13.8)(发病率比,0.84;95%CI,0.80 - 0.99)。随访期间,与非计划住院相关的费用显著降低(发病率比,0.92;95%CI,0.91 - 0.92),而与药物(发病率比,1.14;p < 0.01)、门诊专科就诊(发病率比,1.19;p < 0.01)和计划住院(发病率比1.03;p < 0.01)相关的费用显著增加。这些变化可能与人口老龄化和医疗服务提供的改变有关;因此,进行了病例对照分析。结果表明,干预组随访期间非计划住院的次数(发病率比,0.79;95%CI,0.68 - 0.91)、住院时间(发病率比,0.80;95%CI,0.76 - 0.84)以及相关费用(发病率比,0.80;95%CI,0.80 - 0.80)显著更低。然而,与常规护理患者相比,普利亚护理计划随访期间住院、药物和门诊专科就诊费用的增加幅度更大。

结论

在基于人群的队列中,与具有可比临床和人口统计学特征的常规护理患者相比,将慢性病患者纳入基于CCM的计划与非计划住院的发生率显著降低相关。

相似文献

1
The effects of the introduction of a chronic care model-based program on utilization of healthcare resources: the results of the Puglia care program.基于慢性病护理模式的项目引入对医疗资源利用的影响:普利亚护理项目的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 25;18(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3075-0.
2
Association of Integrated Team-Based Care With Health Care Quality, Utilization, and Cost.整合团队式照护与医疗质量、利用和成本的关联。
JAMA. 2016;316(8):826-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11232.
3
Changes in diabetes care introduced by a Chronic Care Model-based programme in Tuscany: a 4-year cohort study.托斯卡纳一项基于慢性病照护模式的项目所带来的糖尿病护理变化:一项为期4年的队列研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(1):14-19. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw181.
4
Economic burden of diverticular disease: An observational analysis based on real world data from an Italian region.基于意大利某地区真实世界数据的观察性分析:憩室疾病的经济负担。
Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Sep;49(9):1003-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
5
Healthcare utilization and costs of patients with rosacea in an insured population.参保人群中酒渣鼻患者的医疗服务利用情况及费用
J Drugs Dermatol. 2008 Jan;7(1):41-9.
6
The risks and costs of multiple-generic substitution of topiramate.托吡酯多晶型替代的风险和成本。
Neurology. 2009 Jun 16;72(24):2122-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181aa5300.
7
Impact of Paliperidone Palmitate Versus Oral Atypical Antipsychotics on Health Care Resource Use and Costs in Veterans With Schizophrenia and Comorbid Substance Abuse.棕榈酸帕利哌酮与口服非典型抗精神病药物对合并物质滥用的退伍军人精神分裂症患者医疗资源利用及成本的影响。
Clin Ther. 2017 Jul;39(7):1380-1395.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.356. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
8
Opposite trends in hospitalization and mortality after implementation of a chronic care model-based regional program for the management of patients with heart failure in primary care.在初级保健中实施基于慢性护理模式的区域性心力衰竭患者管理项目后,住院率和死亡率呈现相反趋势。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 30;18(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3164-0.
9
Comorbidity burden, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in chronic gout patients refractory to conventional urate-lowering therapy.慢性痛风患者在常规降尿酸治疗抵抗后的合并症负担、医疗资源利用和成本。
Am J Ther. 2012 Nov;19(6):e157-66. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e31820543c5.
10
Clinical and economic outcomes of multiple versus single long-acting inhalers in COPD.COPD 中多种长效吸入器与单一长效吸入器的临床和经济结局。
Respir Med. 2011 Dec;105(12):1861-71. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic care provision in general practices and association with patient level outcomes: a nationwide cohort study.全科医疗中的慢性病护理及其与患者层面结局的关联:一项全国性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 7;23(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04239-z.
2
The cost and cost implications of implementing the integrated chronic disease management model in South Africa.在南非实施综合慢性病管理模式的成本及成本影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 26;15(6):e0235429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235429. eCollection 2020.
3
Both pre-frailty and frailty increase healthcare utilization and adverse health outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

本文引用的文献

1
Building Bridges for Innovation in Ageing: Synergies between Action Groups of the EIP on AHA.搭建老龄化创新桥梁:欧洲创新伙伴关系(EIP)在积极健康老龄化方面各行动小组之间的协同作用
J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(1):92-104. doi: 10.1007/s12603-016-0803-1.
2
The Drug Derived Complexity Index (DDCI) Predicts Mortality, Unplanned Hospitalization and Hospital Readmissions at the Population Level.药物衍生复杂性指数(DDCI)可在人群层面预测死亡率、非计划住院率和再入院率。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 19;11(2):e0149203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149203. eCollection 2016.
3
The chronic care model for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.
无论是衰弱前期还是衰弱,都会增加 2 型糖尿病患者的医疗保健利用和不良健康结局。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Sep 27;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0772-2.
2型糖尿病的慢性护理模式:一项系统评价。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2016 Jan 22;8:7. doi: 10.1186/s13098-015-0119-z. eCollection 2016.
4
Impact of a Novel Collaborative Long-Term Care -EMS Model: A Before-and-After Cohort Analysis of an Extended Care Paramedic Program.新型协作式长期护理-急救医疗服务模式的影响:一项针对扩展护理护理人员项目的前后队列分析。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20(1):111-6. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1051678. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
5
[Tuscan Chronic Care Model: a preliminary analysis].[托斯卡纳慢性病护理模式:初步分析]
Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2015 Sep-Oct;71(5):499-513.
6
Measured outcomes of chronic care programs for older adults: a systematic review.老年人慢性护理项目的测量结果:一项系统综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Oct 26;15:139. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0136-7.
7
Selection of the method to appraise and compare health systems using risk stratification: the ASSEHS approach.使用风险分层评估和比较卫生系统的方法选择:ASSEHS 方法。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015 Dec;27(6):767-74. doi: 10.1007/s40520-015-0458-5. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
8
Experiences of Community-Living Older Adults Receiving Integrated Care Based on the Chronic Care Model: A Qualitative Study.基于慢性病护理模式的社区居住老年人接受综合护理的体验:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 21;10(10):e0137803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137803. eCollection 2015.
9
Current advance care planning practice in the Australian community: an online survey of home care package case managers and service managers.澳大利亚社区当前的预立医疗计划实践:对家庭护理套餐个案经理和服务经理的在线调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Apr 23;14:15. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0018-y.
10
From concept to content: assessing the implementation fidelity of a chronic care model for frail, older people who live at home.从概念到内容:评估针对居家体弱老年人的慢性病护理模式的实施保真度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:18. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0662-6.