Robusto Fabio, Bisceglia Lucia, Petrarolo Vito, Avolio Francesca, Graps Elisabetta, Attolini Ettore, Nacchiero Eleonora, Lepore Vito
Regional Healthcare Agency of Puglia Region (AReSS Puglia), via Giovanni Gentile n 52 -, 70126, Bari, Italy.
AReSS Puglia, Bari, Italy.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 May 25;18(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3075-0.
Ageing is continuously increasing the prevalence of patients with chronic conditions, putting pressure on the sustainability of Healthcare Systems. Chronic Care Models (CCM) have been used to address the needs of frail people in the continuum of care, testifying to an improvement in health outcomes and more efficient access to healthcare services. The impact of CCM deployment has already been experienced in a selected cohort of patients affected by specific chronic illnesses. We have investigated its effects in a heterogeneous frail cohort included in a regional CCM-based program.
a retrospective population-based cohort study was carried out involving a non-oncological cohort of adult subjects with chronic diseases included in the CCM-oriented program (Puglia Care). Individuals in usual care with comparable demographic and clinical characteristics were selected for matched pair analysis. Study cohorts were defined by using a record linkage analysis of administrative databases and electronic medical records, including data on the adult population in the 6 local area health authorities of Puglia in Italy (approximately 2 million people). The effects of Puglia Care on the utilizations of healthcare resources were evaluated both in a before-after and in a case-control analysis.
There were 1074 subjects included in Puglia Care and 2126 matched controls. In before-after analysis of the Puglia Care cohort, 240 unplanned hospitalizations occurred in the pre-inclusion period, while 239 were registered during follow-up. The incidence of unplanned hospitalization was 10.3 per 100 person/year (95% CI, 9.1-11.7) during follow-up and 12.1 per 100 person/year (95% CI, 10.7-13.8) in the pre-inclusion period (IRR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99). During follow-up a significant reduction in costs related to unplanned hospitalizations (IRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.91-0.92) was registered, while costs related to drugs (IRR, 1.14; p < 0.01), out-patient specialist visits (IRR, 1.19; p < 0.01), and planned hospitalization (IRR 1.03; p < 0.01) increased significantly. These modifications can be related to the aging of the population and modifications to healthcare delivery; for this reason, a case-control analysis was performed. The results testify to a significantly lower number (IRR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.91), length of hospital stay (IRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.76-0.84), and costs related to unplanned hospitalizations (IRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.80-0.80) during follow-up in the intervention group. However, there was a higher increase in costs of hospitalizations, drugs and out-patients specialist visits during follow-up in Puglia Care when compared with patients in usual care.
In a population-based cohort, inclusion of chronic patients in a CCM-based program was significantly associated with a lower recourse to unplanned hospital admissions when compared with patients in usual care with comparable clinical and demographic characteristics.
老龄化使得慢性病患者的比例持续上升,给医疗保健系统的可持续性带来压力。慢性病护理模式(CCM)已被用于满足体弱患者在连续护理过程中的需求,这证明了健康状况的改善以及获得医疗服务的效率提高。CCM的应用效果已在特定慢性病患者的选定队列中得到体现。我们调查了其在一个基于区域CCM计划的异质性体弱队列中的效果。
开展了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,纳入了参与以CCM为导向的计划(普利亚护理计划)的患有慢性病的非肿瘤成年受试者队列。选择具有可比人口统计学和临床特征的常规护理个体进行配对分析。通过对行政数据库和电子病历的记录链接分析来定义研究队列,包括意大利普利亚6个地方卫生当局成年人口的数据(约200万人)。在前后分析和病例对照分析中评估普利亚护理计划对医疗资源利用的影响。
普利亚护理计划纳入了1074名受试者和2126名匹配对照。在普利亚护理计划队列的前后分析中,纳入前时期发生了240次非计划住院,而随访期间记录了239次。随访期间非计划住院的发生率为每100人/年10.3次(95%CI,9.1 - 11.7),纳入前时期为每100人/年12.1次(95%CI,10.7 - 13.8)(发病率比,0.84;95%CI,0.80 - 0.99)。随访期间,与非计划住院相关的费用显著降低(发病率比,0.92;95%CI,0.91 - 0.92),而与药物(发病率比,1.14;p < 0.01)、门诊专科就诊(发病率比,1.19;p < 0.01)和计划住院(发病率比1.03;p < 0.01)相关的费用显著增加。这些变化可能与人口老龄化和医疗服务提供的改变有关;因此,进行了病例对照分析。结果表明,干预组随访期间非计划住院的次数(发病率比,0.79;95%CI,0.68 - 0.91)、住院时间(发病率比,0.80;95%CI,0.76 - 0.84)以及相关费用(发病率比,0.80;95%CI,0.80 - 0.80)显著更低。然而,与常规护理患者相比,普利亚护理计划随访期间住院、药物和门诊专科就诊费用的增加幅度更大。
在基于人群的队列中,与具有可比临床和人口统计学特征的常规护理患者相比,将慢性病患者纳入基于CCM的计划与非计划住院的发生率显著降低相关。