Koslin D B, Kenney P J, Keller F S, Koehler R E, Gross G M
Department of Radiology, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham 35233.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1988 Dec;11(6):329-35. doi: 10.1007/BF02577409.
Sonography, computed tomography, and most recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been advocated as noninvasive imaging methods for the preoperative evaluation of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). We prospectively assessed the value of MRI in this clinical setting. Twenty of 23 patients with AAA referred for evaluation with biplane aortography underwent MRI within 3 days of aortography. MR and angiographic studies were interpreted prospectively and independently and then the results were compared with each other and with the operative findings. All angiographically demonstrated infrarenal and suprarenal aneurysms except one were documented as such by MRI. The distal extent of the aneurysm on MRI agreed with that on angiography in all but 3 cases. MRI is an accurate method for assessing the size and extent of AAA and its relationship to the main renal artery origins. MRI is not accurate in detecting vascular obstructions or accessory renal arteries. Therefore, the usefulness of MRI and the need for aortography in preoperative assessment of AAA depends upon the specific information the surgeon requires prior to aneurysmectomy in a given patient.
超声检查、计算机断层扫描以及最近的磁共振成像(MRI)已被提倡作为腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者术前评估的非侵入性成像方法。我们前瞻性地评估了MRI在这种临床情况下的价值。23例因双平面主动脉造影转诊评估的AAA患者中有20例在主动脉造影后3天内接受了MRI检查。对MR和血管造影研究进行了前瞻性和独立解读,然后将结果相互比较并与手术结果进行比较。除1例患者外,所有血管造影显示的肾下和肾上动脉瘤均被MRI记录。除3例患者外,MRI上动脉瘤的远端范围与血管造影上的一致。MRI是评估AAA大小、范围及其与主要肾动脉起源关系的准确方法。MRI在检测血管阻塞或副肾动脉方面不准确。因此,MRI的有用性以及在AAA术前评估中进行主动脉造影的必要性取决于特定患者在动脉瘤切除术前外科医生所需的具体信息。