Hemodynamic effects of enhanced external counterpulsation on cerebral arteries: a multiscale study.

BACKGROUND

Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is an effective method for treating patients with cerebral ischemic stroke, while hemodynamics is the major contributing factor in the treatment of EECP. Different counterpulsation modes have the potential to lead to different acute and long-term hemodynamic changes, resulting in different treatment effects. However, various questions about appropriate counterpulsation modes for optimizing hemodynamic effects remain unanswered in clinical treatment.

METHODS

A zero-dimensional/three-dimensional (0D/3D) geometric multiscale model of the cerebral artery was established to obtain acute hemodynamic indicators, including mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cerebral blood flow (CBF), as well as localized hemodynamic details for the cerebral artery, which includes wall shear stress (WSS) and oscillatory shear index (OSI). Counterpulsation was achieved by applying pressure on calf, thigh and buttock modules in the 0D model. Different counterpulsation modes including various pressure amplitudes and pressurization durations were applied to investigate hemodynamic responses, which impact acute and long-term treatment effects. Both vascular collapse and cerebral autoregulation were considered during counterpulsation.

RESULTS

Variations of pressure amplitude and pressurization duration have different impacts on hemodynamic effects during EECP treatment. There were small differences in the hemodynamics when similar or different pressure amplitudes were applied to calves, thighs and buttocks. When increasing pressure amplitude was applied to the three body parts, MAP and CBF improved slightly. When pressure amplitude exceeded 200 mmHg, hemodynamic indicators almost never changed, demonstrating consistency with clinical data. However, hemodynamic indicators improved significantly with increasing pressurization duration. For pressurization durations of 0.5, 0.6 and 0.7 s, percentage increases for MAP during counterpulsation were 1.5%, 23.5% and 39.0%, for CBF were 1.2%, 23.4% and 41.6% and for time-averaged WSS were 0.2%, 43.5% and 85.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

When EECP was applied to patients with cerebral ischemic stroke, pressure amplitude applied to the three parts may remain the same. Patients may not gain much more benefit from EECP treatment by excessively increasing pressure amplitude above 200 mmHg. However, during clinical procedures, pressurization duration could be increased to 0.7 s during the cardiac circle to optimize the hemodynamics for possible superior treatment outcomes.