• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2023-2024 年日本具有功能声称的食品临床试验报告的研究质量:基于评估随机试验偏倚风险的修订工具进行的评估。

Research Quality of Clinical Trials Reported for Foods with Function Claims in Japan, 2023-2024: Evaluation Based on a Revised Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials.

机构信息

Faculty of Regional Environment Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, 1-1-1 Sakuragaoka, Setagaya-ku 156-8502, Tokyo, Japan.

Physical Education and Medicine Research Center Unnan, 328 Uji, Unnan City 699-1105, Shimane, Japan.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2024 Aug 17;16(16):2744. doi: 10.3390/nu16162744.

DOI:10.3390/nu16162744
PMID:39203880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11357381/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Foods with Function Claim was introduced in Japan in April 2015 to make more products available that are labeled with health functions. A product's functionality of function claims must be explained by the scientific evidence presented in clinical trials (CTs) or systematic reviews, but the quality of recent CTs is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of bias (RoB) using "a revised tool to assess risk (RoB 2)" published in 2018 for notifications based on all recent CTs published on the Consumer Affairs Agency website.

METHODS

A total of 38 submitted papers based on CTs that were published on the Consumer Affairs Agency website during the period from 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2024 were eligible. The RoB 2 tool provides a framework for considering the risk of bias in the findings of any type of randomized trial. This tool with five domains was used to evaluate the quality of research methods.

RESULTS

Eligible CTs were assessed as "low risk" (11%, = 4), "medium risk" (13%, = 5), and "high risk" (76%, = 29). A number of highly biased papers were published. Bias occurred in all five domains, especially "bias in selection of the reported result (Domain 5)", which was the most serious ("high risk"; 75%). For elements correlated with RoB, there was no significant difference ( = 0.785) in the RoB 2 score between for-profit and academic research in the author's affiliated organization. There was no significant difference ( = 0.498) in the RoB score between the published year categories of 2000-2019 and 2020-2024, and no significant difference ( = 0.643) in the RoB score between English and Japanese language publications.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the quality of the latest CTs submitted after 2023 was very low, occurring in all five domains, and was most serious for "bias in selection of the reported result (Domain 5)".

摘要

背景

功能声称食品于 2015 年 4 月在日本推出,目的是让更多具有健康功能的产品能够贴上标签。产品的功能声称必须通过临床试验(CT)或系统评价中提供的科学证据来解释,但最近 CT 的质量尚不清楚。本研究的目的是使用 2018 年发布的“评估风险偏倚(RoB)的修订工具(RoB 2)”,对基于所有最近在消费者厅网站上发布的 CT 的通知进行风险偏倚评估。

方法

2023 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 6 月 30 日期间,从消费者厅网站上发布的 CT 中筛选出共 38 篇符合条件的论文。RoB 2 工具为评估任何类型的随机试验结果的风险偏倚提供了一个框架。该工具使用五个领域来评估研究方法的质量。

结果

符合条件的 CT 被评估为“低风险”(11%, = 4)、“中风险”(13%, = 5)和“高风险”(76%, = 29)。许多高度有偏倚的论文发表了。偏倚发生在所有五个领域,特别是“报告结果选择的偏倚(领域 5)”最为严重(“高风险”;75%)。对于与 RoB 相关的因素,在作者所属机构的营利性和学术研究之间,RoB 2 评分没有显著差异( = 0.785)。在 2000-2019 年和 2020-2024 年出版年份类别之间,RoB 评分没有显著差异( = 0.498),在英语和日语出版物之间,RoB 评分也没有显著差异( = 0.643)。

结论

总体而言,2023 年后提交的最新 CT 质量非常低,所有五个领域都存在偏倚,“报告结果选择的偏倚(领域 5)”最为严重。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/899a/11357381/95e44c70990c/nutrients-16-02744-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/899a/11357381/67056b4a07e0/nutrients-16-02744-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/899a/11357381/d4db2137899f/nutrients-16-02744-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/899a/11357381/95e44c70990c/nutrients-16-02744-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/899a/11357381/67056b4a07e0/nutrients-16-02744-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/899a/11357381/d4db2137899f/nutrients-16-02744-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/899a/11357381/95e44c70990c/nutrients-16-02744-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Research Quality of Clinical Trials Reported for Foods with Function Claims in Japan, 2023-2024: Evaluation Based on a Revised Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Randomized Trials.2023-2024 年日本具有功能声称的食品临床试验报告的研究质量:基于评估随机试验偏倚风险的修订工具进行的评估。
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 17;16(16):2744. doi: 10.3390/nu16162744.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Quality of Systematic Reviews of the Foods with Function Claims in Japan: Comparative Before- and After-Evaluation of Verification Reports by the Consumer Affairs Agency.日本声称具有特定功能的食品系统评价的质量:消费者厅验证报告的前后对比评估。
Nutrients. 2019 Jul 12;11(7):1583. doi: 10.3390/nu11071583.
4
A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Forty Systematic Reviews of Foods with Function Claims (FFC) in Japan: Quality Assessment Using AMSTAR 2.基于日本 40 项具有功能声称的食品(FFC)的系统评价的横断面研究:使用 AMSTAR 2 进行质量评估。
Nutrients. 2023 Apr 24;15(9):2047. doi: 10.3390/nu15092047.
5
Frequency of use and adequacy of Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 in non-Cochrane systematic reviews published in 2020: Meta-research study.2020 年发表的非 Cochrane 系统评价中 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具 2 的使用频率和充分性:元研究。
Res Synth Methods. 2024 May;15(3):430-440. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1695. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
6
Risk of bias over time in updates of Cochrane oral health reviews.Cochrane 口腔健康评价更新中随时间变化的偏倚风险。
J Dent. 2019 Jan;80:63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
7
Compliance of Clinical Trial Protocols for Foods with Function Claims (FFC) in Japan: Consistency between Clinical Trial Registrations and Published Reports.日本具有功能声称(FFC)的食品临床试验方案的依从性:临床试验注册与已发表报告的一致性。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 25;14(1):81. doi: 10.3390/nu14010081.
8
Quality of systematic reviews of the Foods with Function Claims registered at the Consumer Affairs Agency Web site in Japan: a prospective systematic review.日本消费者事务局网站注册的具有功能声称食品的系统评价质量:一项前瞻性系统评价。
Nutr Res. 2017 Apr;40:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
9
Risk of bias of randomized trials over time.随机试验的偏倚风险随时间变化。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;68(9):1036-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.001. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
10
[Application of the Risk of Bias 2 Tool].[偏倚风险2工具的应用]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2021 Apr;68(2):85-91. doi: 10.6224/JN.202104_68(2).11.

本文引用的文献

1
The Beni-Koji scandal and Japan's unique health food system.贝尼可吉丑闻与日本独特的健康食品体系。
Lancet. 2024 May 25;403(10441):2287-2288. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00882-1.
2
Common challenges and suggestions for risk of bias tool development: a systematic review of methodological studies.常见的偏倚风险工具开发挑战和建议:方法学研究的系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Jul;171:111370. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111370. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
3
Methods used to develop the SPIRIT 2024 and CONSORT 2024 Statements.用于制定《SPIRIT 2024声明》和《CONSORT 2024声明》的方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 May;169:111309. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111309. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
Misleading presentations in functional food trials led by contract research organizations were frequently observed in Japan: meta-epidemiological study.在日本,经常观察到由合同研究组织主导的功能性食品试验中存在误导性陈述:元流行病学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 May;169:111302. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111302. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
5
[Current Status and Issues on the Foods with Function Claims System in Japan: Evidence of Functionality of the Foods].[日本具有功能声称食品制度的现状与问题:食品功能的证据]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2023 Nov 1;143(11):931-940. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.23-00121. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
6
A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Forty Systematic Reviews of Foods with Function Claims (FFC) in Japan: Quality Assessment Using AMSTAR 2.基于日本 40 项具有功能声称的食品(FFC)的系统评价的横断面研究:使用 AMSTAR 2 进行质量评估。
Nutrients. 2023 Apr 24;15(9):2047. doi: 10.3390/nu15092047.
7
Risk-of-bias assessment using Cochrane's revised tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was useful but challenging and resource-intensive: observations from a systematic review.使用 Cochrane 修订版随机试验偏倚风险评估工具(RoB 2)进行风险评估是有用的,但具有挑战性且资源密集型:来自系统评价的观察结果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Sep;161:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.015. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
8
Adherence of systematic reviews to Cochrane RoB2 guidance was frequently poor: a meta epidemiological study.系统评价对Cochrane RoB2指南的遵循情况通常较差:一项Meta流行病学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Dec;152:47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
9
Compliance of Clinical Trial Protocols for Foods with Function Claims (FFC) in Japan: Consistency between Clinical Trial Registrations and Published Reports.日本具有功能声称(FFC)的食品临床试验方案的依从性:临床试验注册与已发表报告的一致性。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 25;14(1):81. doi: 10.3390/nu14010081.
10
Reliability of the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB2) improved with the use of implementation instruction.修订版 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚风险评估工具(RoB2)在使用实施说明后,可靠性得到提高。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;141:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.021. Epub 2021 Sep 16.