• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消化性溃疡穿孔的治疗方法:随机对照试验的网状Meta分析

Approaches for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Wadewitz Elisabeth, Friedrichs Juliane, Grilli Maurizio, Vey Johannes A, Zimmermann Samuel, Sunami Yoshiaki, Kleeff Jörg, Ronellenfitsch Ulrich, Klose Johannes, Rebelo Artur

机构信息

Department of Visceral, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.

Library of the Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Sep 5;410(1):266. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03848-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-025-03848-9
PMID:40911086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12413338/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to evaluate surgical and alternative treatment strategies for perforated peptic ulcers (PPU) with respect to mortality and other clinically relevant outcomes.

METHODS

An NMA was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to assess treatment approaches for PPU. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were identified through systematic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP databases. Outcomes were analyzed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous data and odds ratios (ORs) for binary data, both presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in a network meta-analysis framework.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies comprising 1,259 patients were included in this NMA. The laparoscopic approach demonstrated significantly reduced mortality (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.75, p = 0.0065) and postoperative complications, including wound infections (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.08-0.27, p < 0.0001) and ileus (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.18-0.59), compared to the open surgical approach.

CONCLUSIONS

This NMA, particularly the pairwise analysis, confirms the significant advantages of laparoscopic over open surgery, reinforcing its status as the gold standard for PPU. The potential benefits of alternative approaches, are inconclusive due to insufficient evidence.

摘要

目的

本网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在评估穿孔性消化性溃疡(PPU)的手术及其他替代治疗策略在死亡率和其他临床相关结局方面的情况。

方法

按照PRISMA指南进行NMA,以评估PPU的治疗方法。通过对PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、CINAHL、ClinicalTrials.gov和ICTRP数据库进行系统检索,确定随机对照试验(RCT)。在网络荟萃分析框架中,对连续数据使用标准化均数差(SMD),对二分类数据使用比值比(OR)分析结局,并给出95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

本NMA纳入了16项研究,共1259例患者。与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术方法显示死亡率显著降低(OR 0.36,95% CI 0.17 - 0.75,p = 0.0065),术后并发症包括伤口感染(OR 0.15,95% CI 0.08 - 0.27,p < 0.0001)和肠梗阻(OR 0.33,95% CI 0.18 - 0.59)也显著降低。

结论

本NMA,尤其是成对分析,证实了腹腔镜手术相对于开放手术具有显著优势,强化了其作为PPU金标准的地位。由于证据不足,替代方法的潜在益处尚无定论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a705/12413338/9f66d49f66d5/423_2025_3848_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a705/12413338/72606c653d90/423_2025_3848_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a705/12413338/1c59451ea97e/423_2025_3848_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a705/12413338/7245a90d1d34/423_2025_3848_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a705/12413338/752ebee771da/423_2025_3848_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a705/12413338/9f66d49f66d5/423_2025_3848_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a705/12413338/72606c653d90/423_2025_3848_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a705/12413338/1c59451ea97e/423_2025_3848_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a705/12413338/7245a90d1d34/423_2025_3848_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a705/12413338/752ebee771da/423_2025_3848_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a705/12413338/9f66d49f66d5/423_2025_3848_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Approaches for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.消化性溃疡穿孔的治疗方法:随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Sep 5;410(1):266. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03848-9.
2
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.腹腔镜修补术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔疾病
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD004778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004778.pub3.
3
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.腹腔镜修补术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔疾病
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD004778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004778.pub2.
4
Approaches for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - study protocol.穿孔性消化性溃疡治疗方法的研究:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析 - 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 18;14(3):e082732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082732.
5
Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.用于治疗压疮的敷料和外用剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6(6):CD011947. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011947.pub2.
6
Dressings and topical agents for treating venous leg ulcers.用于治疗下肢静脉溃疡的敷料和外用剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 15;6(6):CD012583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012583.pub2.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
Biologics or tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis in incomplete responders to methotrexate or other traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂或托法替布用于对甲氨蝶呤或其他传统改善病情抗风湿药物反应不完全的类风湿关节炎患者:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 13;2016(5):CD012183. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012183.
9
Alternative treatments to treat perforated peptic ulcer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.治疗穿孔性消化性溃疡的替代疗法:随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Apr 11;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00599-2.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open repair for peptic ulcer perforation: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials. Time to conclude!腹腔镜与开放手术修复消化性溃疡穿孔:一项随机对照试验的系统评价、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析。是时候得出结论了!
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 May;107(5):331-345. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0082. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery in the emergency setting: a systematic review.机器人与腹腔镜普通外科手术在急诊环境中的比较:系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jul 5;18(1):281. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02016-3.
3
National trends and outcomes of robotic emergency general surgery in the United States.
美国机器人急诊普通外科的国家趋势和结果。
Surgery. 2024 Sep;176(3):835-840. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.002. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
4
Approaches for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcers: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - study protocol.穿孔性消化性溃疡治疗方法的研究:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析 - 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 18;14(3):e082732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082732.
5
Robotic Technology in Emergency General Surgery Cases in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery.机器人技术在微创外科时代的急诊普通外科手术中的应用。
JAMA Surg. 2024 May 1;159(5):493-499. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0016.
6
A comparative study on laparoscopic and open surgical approaches for perforated peptic ulcer repair: efficacy and outcomes analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗穿孔性消化性溃疡的比较研究:疗效与结局分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Nov 14;408(1):435. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03171-1.
7
Visualisation ergonomics and robotic surgery.可视化人机工程学与机器人手术。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):1873-1878. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01618-7. Epub 2023 May 19.
8
Combined endoscopic and radiologic intervention for management of acute perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.联合内镜和放射介入治疗急性穿孔性消化性溃疡:一项随机对照试验。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 May 24;17(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00429-9.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Stent treatment or surgical closure for perforated duodenal ulcers: a prospective randomized study.支架治疗或手术闭合治疗穿孔性十二指肠溃疡:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):7183-7190. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08158-3. Epub 2020 Nov 30.