• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弹性核颈椎间盘假体在单节段和双节段结构中的运动学评估。

Kinematic assessment of an elastic-core cervical disc prosthesis in one and two-level constructs.

作者信息

Guyer Richard D, Voronov Leonard I, Havey Robert M, Khayatzadeh Saeed, Carandang Gerard, Blank Kenneth R, Werner Stephanie, Rubin Josh, Padovani Nick, Patwardhan Avinash G

机构信息

Texas Back Institute Plano Texas.

Loyola University Chicago Maywood Illinois.

出版信息

JOR Spine. 2018 Dec 17;1(4):e1040. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1040. eCollection 2018 Dec.

DOI:10.1002/jsp2.1040
PMID:31463455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6686807/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has been associated with the development of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), with clinical incidence of approximately 3% per year. Cervical total disc arthroplasty (TDA) has been proposed as an alternative to prevent ASD.

HYPOTHESES

TDA in optimal placement using an elastic-core cervical disc (RHINE, K2M Inc., Leesburg, Virginia) will replicate natural kinematics and will improve with optimal vs anterior placement.

METHODS

Seven C3-T1 cervical cadaver spines were tested intact first, then after one-level TDA at C5-C6 anterior placement, after TDA at C5-C6 optimal placement, after two-level TDA at C5-C6 and C6-C7 optimal placement, and finally after two-level TDA at C5-C6 lateral placement and C6-C7 optimal placement. The specimens were subjected to: Flexion-Extension moments (+1.5 Nm) with compressive preloads of 0 N and 150 N, lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR) (+1.5 Nm) without preload.

RESULTS

optimal placement resulted in a non-significant increase in flexion-extension ROM compared to intact under 0 N and 150 N preload ( > 0.05). Both LB and AR ROM decreased with arthroplasty ( < 0.01). ptimal placement of resulted in an increase in flexion-extension ROM with preload compared to intact ( < 0.05) while LB and AR ROM decreased with arthroplasty ( < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This six degree of freedom elastic-core disc arthroplasty effectively restored flexion-extension motion to intact levels. In LB the TDA maintained 42% ROM at C5-C6 and 60% at C6-C7. In AR 57% of the ROM was maintained at C5-C6 and 70% at C6-C7. These findings are supported by literature which shows cervical TDA results in restoration of approximately 50% ROM in LB and AR, which is a multifactorial phenomenon encompassing TDA design parameters and anatomical constraints. Anterior placement of this viscoelastic TDA device shows motion restoration similar to optimal placement suggesting its design may be less sensitive to suboptimal placement.

摘要

引言

颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与相邻节段退变(ASD)的发生有关,临床发病率约为每年3%。颈椎全椎间盘置换术(TDA)已被提议作为预防ASD的一种替代方法。

假设

使用弹性核颈椎间盘(RHINE,K2M公司,弗吉尼亚州利斯堡)进行最佳位置的TDA将复制自然运动学,并且与前路放置相比,最佳放置会有更好的效果。

方法

首先对7个C3-T1颈椎尸体脊柱进行完整测试,然后在C5-C6前路放置单节段TDA后、C5-C6最佳位置放置TDA后、C5-C6和C6-C7最佳位置放置双节段TDA后,以及最后在C5-C6外侧放置和C6-C7最佳位置放置双节段TDA后进行测试。对标本施加:在0 N和150 N压缩预载荷下的屈伸力矩(+1.5 Nm),以及无预载荷的侧弯(LB)和轴向旋转(AR)(+1.5 Nm)。

结果

与在0 N和150 N预载荷下的完整状态相比,最佳位置放置导致屈伸活动度(ROM)无显著增加(P>0.05)。随着人工椎间盘置换术,侧弯和轴向旋转的ROM均降低(P<0.01)。与完整状态相比,在预载荷下,该弹性核的最佳位置放置导致屈伸ROM增加(P<0.05),而侧弯和轴向旋转的ROM随着人工椎间盘置换术而降低(P<0.01)。

结论

这种六自由度弹性核椎间盘置换术有效地将屈伸运动恢复到完整水平。在侧弯方面,TDA在C5-C6维持了42%的ROM,在C6-C7维持了60%的ROM。在轴向旋转方面,C5-C6维持了57%的ROM,C6-C7维持了70%的ROM。这些发现得到了文献的支持,文献表明颈椎TDA在侧弯和轴向旋转中可恢复约50%的ROM,这是一个多因素现象,包括TDA设计参数和解剖学限制。这种粘弹性TDA装置的前路放置显示出与最佳位置放置相似的运动恢复,表明其设计对次优放置可能不太敏感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/15c5d7458e4a/JSP2-1-e1040-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/2169a7aec86a/JSP2-1-e1040-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/69b58f18e2c9/JSP2-1-e1040-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/4d6db6b782d3/JSP2-1-e1040-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/ba60ab783971/JSP2-1-e1040-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/19d9a279d769/JSP2-1-e1040-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/ec4bc08b13f0/JSP2-1-e1040-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/15c5d7458e4a/JSP2-1-e1040-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/2169a7aec86a/JSP2-1-e1040-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/69b58f18e2c9/JSP2-1-e1040-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/4d6db6b782d3/JSP2-1-e1040-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/ba60ab783971/JSP2-1-e1040-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/19d9a279d769/JSP2-1-e1040-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/ec4bc08b13f0/JSP2-1-e1040-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e02/6686807/15c5d7458e4a/JSP2-1-e1040-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Kinematic assessment of an elastic-core cervical disc prosthesis in one and two-level constructs.弹性核颈椎间盘假体在单节段和双节段结构中的运动学评估。
JOR Spine. 2018 Dec 17;1(4):e1040. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1040. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.单节段和双节段颈椎置换与融合术的生物力学比较:对邻近节段脊柱运动学的影响。
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.006.
3
Does Resection of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Affect the Stability of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty?切除后纵韧带会影响颈椎间盘置换术的稳定性吗?
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Aug 3;12(2):285-294. doi: 10.14444/5035. eCollection 2018 Apr.
4
Motion response of a polycrystalline diamond adaptive axis of rotation cervical total disc arthroplasty.多晶金刚石自适应旋转轴颈椎全椎间盘置换术的运动响应
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019 Feb;62:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.12.023. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
5
Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.双节段全椎间盘置换对颈椎运动学的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):E794-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181afe4bb.
6
Influence of cervical total disc replacement on motion in the target and adjacent segments.颈椎间盘置换对目标节段及邻近节段活动度的影响。
Spine J. 2024 Jul;24(7):1313-1322. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.01.018. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
7
Biomechanical Stability of a Stand-Alone Interbody Spacer in Two-Level and Hybrid Cervical Fusion Constructs.独立椎间融合器在双节段及混合式颈椎融合结构中的生物力学稳定性
Global Spine J. 2017 Oct;7(7):681-688. doi: 10.1177/2192568217700105. Epub 2017 May 31.
8
Adjacent-level range of motion and intradiscal pressure after posterior cervical decompression and fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model.颈椎后路减压固定术后邻近节段活动度和椎间盘内压力:一项体外人尸体模型研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 1;37(13):E778-85. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824780b8.
9
Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.单节段或双节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术后邻近节段退变的生物力学评估:有限元分析。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Jun;189:105352. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105352. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
Biomechanical evaluation of a low profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device in the setting of progressive flexion-distraction injury of the cervical spine.在颈椎屈伸分离损伤的情况下,一种低轮廓、带锚定的颈椎椎间间隔器装置的生物力学评估。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Jan;22(1):135-41. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2446-1. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimization of a bearing geometry for a cervical total disc replacement.颈椎全椎间盘置换术轴承几何形状的优化。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Apr 8;13:1469366. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1469366. eCollection 2025.
2
Range of motion after 1, 2, and 3 level cervical disc arthroplasty.单节段、双节段和三节段颈椎间盘置换术后的活动范围。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2023 Nov 20;16:100294. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100294. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Adjacent segment degeneration after single- and double-level cervical total disc replacement: a cohort with an over 12-year follow-up.

本文引用的文献

1
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Prestige LP Disc Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Seven-Year Outcomes.使用 Prestige LP 椎间盘的颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:七年随访结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Jun 22;10:24. doi: 10.14444/3024. eCollection 2016.
2
Prospective, Randomized Comparison of One-level Mobi-C Cervical Total Disc Replacement vs. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results at 5-year Follow-up.单节段Mobi-C颈椎全椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的前瞻性随机对照研究:5年随访结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Feb 26;10:10. doi: 10.14444/3010. eCollection 2016.
3
Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Based Specimen-Specific Kinematic Model for Ex Vivo Assessment of Lumbar Neuroforaminal Space.
单节段和双节段颈椎间盘置换术后邻近节段退变:一项超过 12 年随访的队列研究。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jan;33(1):232-242. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08018-3. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
4
Cervical Disc Arthroplasties Fail to Maintain Physiological Kinematics Under Lateral Eccentric Loads.颈椎间盘置换术在侧向偏心负荷下无法维持生理运动学。
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):445-458. doi: 10.1177/21925682231193642. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
5
Biomechanical evaluation of a novel biomimetic artificial intervertebral disc in canine cervical cadaveric spines.犬颈椎尸体脊柱中新型仿生人工椎间盘的生物力学评估
JOR Spine. 2023 Feb 21;6(2):e1251. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1251. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Accuracy of various fluoroscopic landmarks for determination of midline implant placement within the cervical disc space.各种透视标志在确定颈椎间盘内中线植入物位置中的准确性。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Feb;30(2):554-559. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06638-7. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
7
Biomechanics of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty-A Review of Concepts and Current Technology.颈椎间盘置换术的生物力学——概念与当前技术综述
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(s2):S14-S28. doi: 10.14444/7087.
8
Lumbar and cervical viscoelastic disc replacement: Concepts and current experience.腰椎和颈椎粘弹性椎间盘置换:概念与当前经验。
World J Orthop. 2020 Aug 18;11(8):345-356. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i8.345.
基于三维计算机断层扫描的特定标本运动学模型用于腰椎神经孔空间的体外评估
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jul 15;40(14):E814-22. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000959.
4
Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.颈椎前路间盘切除融合术与 Mobi-C 颈椎人工椎间盘置换术治疗 2 节段症状性退行性椎间盘疾病的前瞻性随机对照多中心临床试验:临床研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Nov;19(5):532-45. doi: 10.3171/2013.6.SPINE12527. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
5
Cervical motion segment percent contributions to flexion-extension during continuous functional movement in control subjects and arthrodesis patients.正常受试者和关节融合术后患者在连续功能运动中颈椎运动节段对屈伸运动的百分比贡献。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 20;38(9):E533-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318289378d.
6
ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study.ProDisc-C 与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗单节段症状性颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病:一项食品和药物管理局研究的 5 年结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Feb 1;38(3):203-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318278eb38.
7
Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article.前瞻性、随机、多中心颈椎关节成形术研究:Kineflex|C 人工椎间盘研究性器械豁免研究的 269 例患者,随访时间至少 2 年:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Oct;15(4):348-58. doi: 10.3171/2011.5.SPINE10769. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
8
Kinematics of cervical total disc replacement adjacent to a two-level, straight versus lordotic fusion.颈椎全椎间盘置换相邻两节段的运动学:直型与前凸型融合的对比。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Aug 1;36(17):1359-66. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318222d4ad.
9
Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.颈椎融合术邻近节段的椎间盘置换:杂交固定与双节段融合的生物力学比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 1;36(23):1932-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fc1aff.
10
Primary and coupled motions after cervical total disc replacement using a compressible six-degree-of-freedom prosthesis.使用可压缩六自由度假体进行颈椎全椎间盘置换术后的主要和联合运动。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Jun;21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S618-29. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1575-7. Epub 2010 Sep 24.