Department of Reproductive Medicine, AZ Jan Palfijn Hospital, Henri Dunantlaan 5, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Bioethics Institute Ghent, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Oct;36(10):2007-2016. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01569-9. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
Belgian legislation allows only strictly anonymous gamete donation and known donation (donation to a recipient known by the donor). Recently, an amendment of the legislation was proposed to grant donor offspring, as of 18 years old, the right to claim identifying information about their donor.
The aim is to explore the attitude of actual sperm donors towards donation and the release of identifying information and to investigate which donors would be willing to donate when anonymity would be prohibited by law.
All men who were accepted as sperm donors (n = 242) by AZ Jan Palfijn Hospital (Ghent, Belgium) were invited to complete an anonymous online survey. The response rate was 65.5%.
One in five (20.1%; n = 30) would continue sperm donation upon a legislation change towards identifiable donation. Three in four donors (75.2%) would agree to provide basic non-identifiable information about themselves and one in three (32.9%) would provide extra non-identifiable information such as a baby photo or a personal letter. Almost half of the donors (45.6%) would agree to donate in a system where the hospital can trace the donor at the child's request and contact the donor, leaving it to the donor to decide whether or not to have contact with the requesting donor child.
These findings show that only one in five current donors would continue to donate when identifiable. The study also demonstrates that current donors think more positive about alternative options and that nearly half of them are willing to be contacted by the hospital at the donor child's request, providing the donor can decide at that time whether or not to release his identity.
比利时法律仅允许严格匿名的配子捐赠和已知的捐赠(捐赠给捐赠者认识的接受者)。最近,有人提议对立法进行修订,赋予 18 岁以上的捐精后代要求获取其捐精者身份信息的权利。
旨在探讨实际捐精者对捐精和身份信息披露的态度,并调查在匿名性被法律禁止的情况下,哪些捐精者愿意捐精。
邀请所有被 AZ Jan Palfijn 医院(根特,比利时)接受为精子捐赠者的男性(n=242)完成匿名在线调查。回复率为 65.5%。
五分之一(20.1%;n=30)的人会在立法改为可识别的捐赠时继续捐精。四分之三的捐精者(75.2%)会同意提供自己的基本非身份信息,三分之一(32.9%)会提供额外的非身份信息,如婴儿照片或个人信件。近一半的捐精者(45.6%)会同意在医院可以根据孩子的要求追踪捐精者并联系捐精者的系统中捐精,由捐精者决定是否与请求的捐精者孩子联系。
这些发现表明,只有五分之一的现有捐精者会在可识别的情况下继续捐精。研究还表明,目前的捐精者对替代方案的看法更为积极,近一半的人愿意在孩子的要求下被医院联系,前提是捐精者可以在当时决定是否披露自己的身份。