• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从比利时的捐精受孕成年人视角看待精子捐献者匿名性问题。

Perspectives on sperm donor anonymity: insights from donor-conceived adults in Belgium.

机构信息

Brussels IVF Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2024 Sep 1;39(9):2021-2031. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae160.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/deae160
PMID:39008824
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11373337/
Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Are donor-conceived adults in Belgium interested in obtaining donor information, and do these interests vary based on their family backgrounds?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Donor-conceived adults express a significant interest in obtaining donor-related information, with the highest interest reported by offspring from heterosexual couples compared to those from lesbian couple-parented or single-parent families.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In Belgium, sperm donation is mainly anonymous, but the rise of direct-to-consumer genetic testing challenges this anonymity.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a cross-sectional study involving an online nationwide survey conducted from July 2022 to October 2023. Participants, aged 18 years and older and being aware of their anonymous sperm donor-conceived status, were recruited through various channels.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 203 participants were included: 62.6% grew up in heterosexual families with infertile fathers, 26.1% with lesbian couples, 8.4% with single parents, and 3.0% in various or diverse family structures. The survey was available in both French and Dutch and consisted of 43 questions, including a mix of yes/no questions and multiple-choice items.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The average age of disclosure was 16.5 years, with notably later disclosure in heterosexual couple-parented households. A substantial 82.8% of donor-conceived individuals expressed a keen interest in obtaining non-personally identifiable donor information, while 69% were curious about personally identifiable donor data. Furthermore, 61.6% conveyed a desire for personal contact with their donors, and 26.6% advocated for the inclusion of the donor's name on their birth certificates. Participants raised in lesbian two-parent families exhibited the lowest level of interest in donor-related information compared with those raised in other family structures. An overwhelming 90.1% wondered about the possibility of having half-siblings from the same sperm donor. Analysis of survey responses on DNA database registration revealed that 55.2% of donor-conceived offspring were already registered, with 68.8% discovering the same donor offspring and 30.4% successfully locating their donors. Compared to individuals from other family structures, those raised in heterosexual couple-parented households exhibit a less positive attitude toward their conception through anonymous sperm donation. About 61.6% of donor-conceived individuals reported experiencing distinct emotions compared to their peers, while 44.1% encountered psychological difficulties related to anonymous sperm donation, primarily attributed to late disclosure. The majority supported the idea of informing the donor about the number of children he facilitated to conceive. Lastly, the study highlighted that 21.2% of donor-conceived adults considered becoming donors themselves, and 31.3% expressed willingness to use an anonymous donor whenever faced with fertility challenges.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our sample size may not fully represent all adults conceived through anonymous sperm donation in Belgium. Participation bias may have influenced the results, especially due to the overrepresentation of participants from heterosexual couples. Additionally, an association exists between individuals raised by heterosexual couples and late disclosure, complicating the analysis by introducing a confounding factor.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The findings of this study contribute to a better understanding of the needs and preferences of donor-conceived adults, with significant potential impact on patient education and healthcare policy.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Study funding was not obtained for this research. There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

摘要

研究问题

比利时的供精生育成人是否有兴趣获取供体信息,这些兴趣是否因他们的家庭背景而异?

总结答案

供精生育的成年人表达了获取与供体相关信息的浓厚兴趣,与来自异性恋夫妇家庭的后代相比,来自女同性恋伴侣或单亲家庭的后代报告的兴趣最高。

已知情况

在比利时,精子捐赠主要是匿名的,但直接面向消费者的基因检测的兴起挑战了这种匿名性。

研究设计、规模、持续时间:这是一项横断面研究,涉及 2022 年 7 月至 2023 年 10 月期间进行的全国性在线调查。参与者年龄在 18 岁及以上,且知晓自己是匿名供精生育的成年人,通过各种渠道招募。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:共有 203 名参与者入选:62.6%的人在有不育父亲的异性恋家庭中长大,26.1%的人在女同性恋伴侣家庭中长大,8.4%的人在单亲家庭中长大,3.0%的人在各种或不同的家庭结构中长大。该调查有法语和荷兰语两种语言版本,共包含 43 个问题,包括混合了是/否问题和多项选择题。

主要结果和机会作用

平均披露年龄为 16.5 岁,异性恋夫妇家庭的披露时间明显较晚。相当多的 82.8%的供精生育成年人表示对获取非个人可识别供体信息非常感兴趣,而 69%的人对个人可识别供体数据感到好奇。此外,61.6%的人表示希望与供体进行个人接触,26.6%的人主张在出生证明上写上供体的名字。与其他家庭结构相比,在女同性恋伴侣家庭中长大的参与者对供体相关信息的兴趣最低。90.1%的参与者想知道是否有可能与同一供体的同父异母兄弟姐妹。对 DNA 数据库登记调查回复的分析表明,55.2%的供精生育后代已经登记,68.8%发现了相同的供体后代,30.4%成功找到了供体。与来自其他家庭结构的个体相比,在异性恋夫妇家庭中长大的个体对通过匿名精子捐赠受孕的态度不太积极。约 61.6%的供精生育成年人报告说与同龄人相比,他们经历了不同的情绪,而 44.1%的人在匿名精子捐赠方面遇到了心理困难,主要归因于披露时间晚。大多数人支持告知供体他帮助受孕的孩子数量的想法。最后,该研究强调,21.2%的供精生育成年人考虑自己成为供体,31.3%的人在面临生育挑战时愿意使用匿名供体。

局限性、谨慎原因:我们的样本量可能无法完全代表所有在比利时通过匿名精子捐赠生育的成年人。参与偏差可能会影响结果,特别是由于异性恋夫妇家庭的参与者过多。此外,在由异性恋夫妇抚养的个体与晚披露之间存在关联,这使得分析复杂化,引入了一个混杂因素。

研究结果的更广泛意义

这项研究的结果有助于更好地了解供精生育成年人的需求和偏好,对患者教育和医疗保健政策具有重要影响。

研究资金/利益冲突:本研究未获得研究资金。没有利益冲突需要披露。

临床试验注册号

无。

相似文献

1
Perspectives on sperm donor anonymity: insights from donor-conceived adults in Belgium.从比利时的捐精受孕成年人视角看待精子捐献者匿名性问题。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Sep 1;39(9):2021-2031. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae160.
2
Same-sex mothers' experiences of equal treatment, parenting stress and disclosure to offspring: a population-based study of parenthood following identity-release sperm donation.同性母亲在平等对待、育儿压力和向子女披露方面的经历:基于身份释放精子捐赠的亲子关系的基于人群的研究。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Oct 31;37(11):2589-2598. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac194.
3
National survey of donor-conceived individuals who requested information about their sperm donor-experiences from 17 years of identity releases in Sweden.对 17 年来从瑞典的身份信息发布中要求了解其精子捐赠者经历的供精所生孩子的全国性调查。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Mar 1;37(3):510-521. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab275.
4
Beyond sperm cells: a qualitative study on constructed meanings of the sperm donor in lesbian families.超越精子细胞:对女同性恋家庭中精子捐赠者构建意义的定性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Jun;29(6):1248-54. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu060. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
5
Online sperm donation: a survey of the demographic characteristics, motivations, preferences and experiences of sperm donors on a connection website.在线精子捐赠:对一家交友网站上精子捐赠者的人口统计学特征、动机、偏好及经历的调查
Hum Reprod. 2016 Sep;31(9):2082-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew166. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
6
Donor sibling relations among adult offspring conceived via insemination by lesbian parents.通过女同性恋父母的授精孕育的成年后代之间的供体亲缘关系。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Nov 2;38(11):2166-2174. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead175.
7
Using the theory of planned behavior to predict parents' disclosure of donor conception to their children: a longitudinal study.运用计划行为理论预测父母向子女披露供精受孕信息的情况:一项纵向研究。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jun 3;39(6):1247-1255. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae070.
8
Positioning the donor in a new landscape-mothers' and fathers' experiences as their adult children obtained information about the identity-release sperm donor.将供体置于新的环境中——父母在其成年子女获取有关身份释放精子供体的信息时的体验。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jul 19;36(8):2181-2188. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab146.
9
Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years.身份公开供精或供卵治疗后 111 对夫妇的披露行为和意向:随访至子女 1-4 岁。
Hum Reprod. 2012 Oct;27(10):2998-3007. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des285. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
10
Attitudes and disclosure decisions of Finnish parents with children conceived using donor sperm.使用捐赠精子受孕的芬兰父母的态度和披露决策。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Oct;28(10):2746-54. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det313. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
FIGO position statement: Gamete donations.国际妇产科联盟立场声明:配子捐赠
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jul;170(1):15-24. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70200. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
'I have to remind myself that everyone's search is different': experiences and outcomes of searching and not searching for donor connections among donor conceived adults.“我必须提醒自己,每个人的寻找方式都不同”:捐赠受孕成年人群体中寻找与不寻找捐赠者关系的经历及结果
Hum Reprod. 2024 Dec 1;39(12):2722-2733. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae210.

本文引用的文献

1
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing and the changing landscape of gamete donor conception: key issues for practitioners and stakeholders.直接面向消费者的基因检测与配子捐赠受孕的变化格局:从业者和利益相关者的关键问题。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2024 Jan;48(1):103421. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103421. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
2
The motives and experiences of donor-conceived persons requesting the identity of their sperm donors.寻求精子供体身份的捐献者所考虑的动机和经历。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2024 Jan;48(1):103413. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103413. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
3
Are donor-conceived people willing to use donors themselves? Insights from individuals conceived via donor-assisted reproduction.供体孕育的人愿意自己使用供体吗?通过供体辅助生殖孕育的个体的观点。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Aug 25;37(9):2087-2094. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac169.
4
National survey of donor-conceived individuals who requested information about their sperm donor-experiences from 17 years of identity releases in Sweden.对 17 年来从瑞典的身份信息发布中要求了解其精子捐赠者经历的供精所生孩子的全国性调查。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Mar 1;37(3):510-521. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab275.
5
The motivations of donor-conceived adults for seeking information about, and contact with, sperm donors.供体孕育成人寻求与供精者相关信息和联系的动机。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Jul;43(1):149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
6
Finding people like me: contact among young adults who share an open-identity sperm donor.寻找像我这样的人:共享公开身份精子捐赠者的年轻人之间的联系。
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Dec 23;2020(4):hoaa057. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa057. eCollection 2020.
7
Being a donor-child: wishes for parental support, peer support and counseling.作为一名捐赠儿童:对父母支持、同伴支持和咨询的愿望。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Mar;40(1):29-37. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2017.1396313. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
8
Parenting in new family forms.新家庭形式中的育儿方式。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Jun;15:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
9
'No daddy', 'A kind of daddy': words used by donor conceived children and (aspiring) parents to refer to the sperm donor.“不是爸爸”,“一种爸爸”:供体受孕孩子及(准)父母用来指代精子供体的词汇。
Cult Health Sex. 2018 Apr;20(4):381-396. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2017.1349180. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
10
Direct-to-consumer DNA testing: the fallout for individuals and their families unexpectedly learning of their donor conception origins.直接面向消费者的DNA检测:个人及其家庭意外得知其捐赠受孕起源的后果。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2018 Dec;21(4):225-228. doi: 10.1080/14647273.2017.1339127. Epub 2017 Jul 11.