Porkhanov V A, Danilov V V, Polyakov I S, Kononenko V B, Zhikharev V A, Krygin S A
Research Institute - Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital, Krasnodar, Russia.
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2019(8):46-52. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia201908146.
To compare the early outcomes of video-assisted and robot-assisted lobectomy.
There were 74 robot-assisted lung resections for the period 2017-2018. Sixty-six patients underwent lobectomy and 8 - segmentectomy. Patients were divided into 2 groups to compare thoracoscopic procedures. The main group consisted of 66 patients after robot-assisted lobectomy. The control group included 247 patients after video-assisted lobectomy. Mean age of patients was 60.5 years (range 35-70). There 72% men and 28% women.
Both thoracoscopic procedures are characterized by high efficiency and safety. However, certain disadvantages are peculiar to both methods.
比较电视辅助与机器人辅助肺叶切除术的早期疗效。
2017年至2018年期间共进行了74例机器人辅助肺切除术。66例患者接受了肺叶切除术,8例接受了肺段切除术。将患者分为2组以比较胸腔镜手术。主要组由66例机器人辅助肺叶切除术后的患者组成。对照组包括247例电视辅助肺叶切除术后的患者。患者的平均年龄为60.5岁(范围35 - 70岁)。男性占72%,女性占28%。
两种胸腔镜手术均具有高效性和安全性的特点。然而,两种方法都存在某些特定的缺点。