• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

α-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂治疗对提示良性前列腺增生的下尿路症状患者粪便形态的影响。

Influence of alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists therapy on stool form in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

作者信息

Matsumoto Seiji, Kasamo Sachiko, Hashizume Kazumi

机构信息

Center for Advanced Research and Education, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.

Clinical Research Support Center, Asahikawa Medical University Hospital, Asahikawa, Japan.

出版信息

Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2020 Jan;12(1):86-91. doi: 10.1111/luts.12289. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1111/luts.12289
PMID:31464384
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of two α1-adrenoceptor (AR) antagonists, tamsulosin and silodosin, in treating patients with untreated lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH), with a focus on stool form.

METHODS

This study was a non-blinded, open-label, prospective randomized comparative study. Tamsulosin or silodosin was administered to patients with untreated LUTS/BPH, and their efficacy and safety in the early stage of treatment were compared using the questionnaire of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)/quality of life (QOL), the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), and the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS).

RESULTS

The per protocol set consisted of 22 patients in tamsulosin group (mean age, 70.15 ± 5.70 years) and 20 patients in silodosin group (73.00 ± 6.48 years). The total IPSS and QOL score improved within 2 weeks in both groups. Although the overall GSRS score showed no significant change in either group, "hard stools" score was significantly decreased in silodosin first at week 2, then in both groups at week 4. Furthermore, the subscale score for "constipation" was significantly decreased only in silodosin at week 4. BSFS was significantly increased at week 4 in silodosin alone.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that silodosin was associated with increased digestive symptoms such as diarrhea and loose stools. Therefore, oral drugs for BPH need to be selected by taking into consideration the possibility of digestive symptoms including both the state and type of stools.

摘要

目的

评估两种α1-肾上腺素能受体(AR)拮抗剂坦索罗辛和西洛多辛治疗未接受过治疗的提示良性前列腺增生的下尿路症状(LUTS/BPH)患者的短期疗效和安全性,重点关注大便形态。

方法

本研究为非盲、开放标签、前瞻性随机对照研究。将坦索罗辛或西洛多辛给予未接受过治疗的LUTS/BPH患者,并使用国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)/生活质量(QOL)问卷、胃肠道症状评定量表(GSRS)和布里斯托大便形态量表(BSFS)比较它们在治疗早期的疗效和安全性。

结果

符合方案集包括坦索罗辛组的22例患者(平均年龄,70.15±5.70岁)和西洛多辛组的20例患者(73.00±6.48岁)。两组患者在2周内IPSS总分和QOL评分均有所改善。虽然两组的总体GSRS评分均无显著变化,但西洛多辛组在第2周时“硬便”评分首先显著降低,然后在第4周时两组均显著降低。此外,仅西洛多辛组在第4周时“便秘”子量表评分显著降低。仅西洛多辛组在第4周时BSFS显著升高。

结论

本研究表明,西洛多辛与腹泻和稀便等消化系统症状增加有关。因此,在选择治疗BPH的口服药物时,需要考虑包括大便状态和类型在内的消化系统症状的可能性。

相似文献

1
Influence of alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists therapy on stool form in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia.α-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂治疗对提示良性前列腺增生的下尿路症状患者粪便形态的影响。
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2020 Jan;12(1):86-91. doi: 10.1111/luts.12289. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
2
Non-inferiority of silodosin to tamsulosin in treating patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).西洛多辛与坦索罗辛治疗良性前列腺增生症(BPH)相关下尿路症状(LUTS)患者的非劣效性比较。
BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1843-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10233.x. Epub 2011 May 18.
3
A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of the new α1A-adrenoceptor-selective antagonist silodosin for treating lower urinary tract symptoms associated with BPH.一项新的α1A-肾上腺素能受体选择性拮抗剂西洛多辛治疗 BPH 相关下尿路症状的疗效和安全性的荟萃分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2013 Mar;16(1):79-84. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2012.36. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
4
Randomized Crossover Comparison of the Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Single Half-Dose Silodosin and Tamsulosin Hydrochoride in Men With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.单半剂量西洛多辛与盐酸坦索罗辛治疗良性前列腺增生继发下尿路症状男性的短期疗效和安全性的随机交叉比较
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2016 Jan;8(1):38-43. doi: 10.1111/luts.12106. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
5
Silodosin as second-line α-blocker monotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A prospective observational study.西洛多辛作为良性前列腺增生患者二线α受体阻滞剂单一疗法:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Urol. 2018 Oct;25(10):849-854. doi: 10.1111/iju.13757. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
6
Role of silodosin in patients with LUTS/BPE non responding to medical treatment with tamsulosin: a prospective, open-label, pilot study.在坦索罗辛治疗 LUTS/BPE 反应不佳的患者中,西洛多辛的作用:一项前瞻性、开放标签、初步研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Nov;21(21):4941-4945.
7
A randomized, comparative, open-label study of efficacy and tolerability of alfuzosin, tamsulosin and silodosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia.一项关于阿夫唑嗪、坦索罗辛和西洛多辛治疗良性前列腺增生症疗效和耐受性的随机、对照、开放标签研究。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2016 Mar-Apr;48(2):134-40. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.178825.
8
Comparison of prophylactic naftopidil, tamsulosin, and silodosin for 125I brachytherapy-induced lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with prostate cancer: randomized controlled trial.比较萘哌地尔、坦索罗辛和西洛多辛预防 125I 近距离放射治疗前列腺癌患者下尿路症状的随机对照试验。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e385-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.04.026. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
9
A comparative randomized prospective study to evaluate efficacy and safety of combination of tamsulosin and tadalafil vs. tamsulosin or tadalafil alone in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia.一项比较随机前瞻性研究,旨在评估坦索罗辛和他达拉非联合与坦索罗辛或他达拉非单药治疗良性前列腺增生所致下尿路症状的疗效和安全性。
J Sex Med. 2014 Jan;11(1):187-96. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12357. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
10
Silodosin is effective for treatment of LUTS in men with BPH: a systematic review.西洛多辛治疗前列腺增生症患者下尿路症状的有效性:系统评价。
Asian J Androl. 2013 Jan;15(1):121-8. doi: 10.1038/aja.2012.102. Epub 2012 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Review of the Clinical Evidence on the Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Safety of Silodosin for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.西洛多辛治疗良性前列腺增生症的疗效、有效性及安全性的临床证据综合综述
Cureus. 2025 Jun 5;17(6):e85445. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85445. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of alpha-blockers as monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.α受体阻滞剂单药治疗良性前列腺增生症的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 15;14(1):11116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61977-5.