University of Virginia.
Dev Psychol. 2019 Sep;55(9):1998-2001. doi: 10.1037/dev0000774.
The 3 papers by Hammond and Drummond (2019), LoBue and Adolph (2019), and Stern, Botdorf, Cassidy, and Riggins (2019) bring into focus some of the exciting and promising new directions emerging in the field of emotional development. This commentary urges researchers moving in these new directions to leverage what is already known about emotional development to inform future predictions and interpretations, as well as to remain mindful of the thorny but essential questions surrounding the conceptualization, measurement, and interpretation of emotions. These points are illustrated with a focus on 2 specific topics. The first concerns how we conceptualize positive and negative emotions and what we might predict about their respective psychological and behavioral effects. The second concerns what should (not) count as evidence of an emotion in infants and young children and highlights the importance of converging evidence across methods and measures as well as of validating measures. This extends to the study of emotional mechanisms such as empathy and sympathy. Considering these questions carefully at this juncture has the potential to make the future study of emotional development all the more fruitful and effective. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Hammond 和 Drummond(2019 年)、LoBue 和 Adolph(2019 年)以及 Stern、Botdorf、Cassidy 和 Riggins(2019 年)的这 3 篇论文聚焦于情感发展领域中出现的一些令人兴奋和有前途的新方向。本评论敦促朝着这些新方向前进的研究人员利用已知的情感发展知识来为未来的预测和解释提供信息,同时也要注意围绕情感的概念化、测量和解释所存在的棘手但至关重要的问题。这一点通过重点关注 2 个具体主题来说明。第一个主题涉及我们如何概念化积极情绪和消极情绪,以及我们可能对它们各自的心理和行为影响做出哪些预测。第二个主题涉及什么应该(不)算作婴儿和幼儿情绪的证据,并强调了在方法和措施以及验证措施上跨领域证据的重要性。这一点延伸到了同理心和同情心等情感机制的研究。在这个关键时刻仔细考虑这些问题有可能使未来的情感发展研究更加富有成效和有效。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。