• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 STan(胎心电子监护图(CTG)加胎儿心电图 ST 段分析)与单独 CTG 对急诊剖宫产率的影响:STan 澳大利亚随机对照试验(START)研究方案。

Comparing the effect of STan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with CTG alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START).

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Trials. 2019 Aug 29;20(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9
PMID:31464638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6716809/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiotocography is almost ubiquitous in its use in intrapartum care. Although it has been demonstrated that there is some benefit from continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring using cardiotocography, there is also an increased risk of caesarean section which is accompanied by short-term and long-term risks to the mother and child. There is considerable potential to reduce unnecessary operative delivery with up to a 60% false positive diagnosis of fetal distress using cardiotocography alone. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram is a promising adjunct to cardiotocography alone, and permits detection of metabolic acidosis of the fetus, potentially reducing false positive diagnosis of fetal distress.

METHODS

This study will be a single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, conducted over 3 years. The primary hypothesis will be that the proportion of women with an emergency caesarean section on ST analysis will not equal that for women on cardiotocography monitoring alone. Participants will be recruited at the Women's and Children's Hospital, a high-risk specialty facility with approximately 5000 deliveries per annum. A total of 1818 women will be randomised to the treatment or conventional arm with an allocation ratio of 1:1, stratified by parity. The primary outcome is emergency caesarean section (yes/no). Statistical analysis will follow standard methods for randomised trials and will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes will also be analysed. Additional study outcomes include psychosocial outcomes, patient preferences and cost-effectiveness.

DISCUSSION

Approximately 20% of Australian babies are delivered by emergency caesarean section. This will be the first Australian trial to examine ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram as an adjunct to cardiotocography as a potential method for reducing this proportion. The trial will be among the first to comprehensively examine ST analysis, taking into account the impact on psychosocial well-being as well as cost-effectiveness. This research will provide Australian evidence for clinical practice and guideline development as well as for policy-makers and consumers to make informed, evidence-based choices about care in labour.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ANZCTR, ACTRN1261800006268 . Registered on 19 January 2018.

摘要

背景

胎心监护在分娩过程中的应用几乎无处不在。虽然已经证明,使用胎心监护进行连续的分娩期胎儿监测有一定的益处,但这也增加了剖宫产的风险,而剖宫产对母婴都有短期和长期的风险。仅使用胎心监护,就有可能将高达 60%的胎儿窘迫假阳性诊断率降低,从而降低不必要的手术分娩率。胎儿心电图 ST 分析是胎心监护的一种很有前途的辅助手段,它可以检测胎儿代谢性酸中毒,从而降低胎儿窘迫的假阳性诊断率。

方法

本研究将是一项为期 3 年的单中心、平行组、随机对照试验。主要假设是,在 ST 分析的女性中,紧急剖宫产的比例将不等于仅行胎心监护监测的女性。参与者将在妇女儿童医院招募,这是一家高危专科医疗机构,每年约有 5000 例分娩。总共将有 1818 名妇女随机分为治疗组或常规组,分配比例为 1:1,并按产次分层。主要结局是紧急剖宫产(是/否)。统计分析将遵循随机试验的标准方法,并基于意向治疗进行分析。次要的产妇和新生儿结局也将进行分析。其他研究结果包括社会心理结局、患者偏好和成本效益。

讨论

大约 20%的澳大利亚婴儿是通过紧急剖宫产分娩的。这将是澳大利亚首个检验胎儿心电图 ST 分析作为降低这一比例的潜在方法的试验。该试验将是第一个全面检验 ST 分析的试验之一,将考虑到对社会心理健康的影响以及成本效益。这项研究将为澳大利亚的临床实践和指南制定提供证据,也为决策者和消费者提供信息,以便他们在分娩时做出明智的、基于证据的选择。

试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心,ACTRN1261800006268。于 2018 年 1 月 19 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdf8/6716809/b8738c3f0f48/13063_2019_3640_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdf8/6716809/bc617c4e7c61/13063_2019_3640_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdf8/6716809/b8738c3f0f48/13063_2019_3640_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdf8/6716809/bc617c4e7c61/13063_2019_3640_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdf8/6716809/b8738c3f0f48/13063_2019_3640_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing the effect of STan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with CTG alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START).比较 STan(胎心电子监护图(CTG)加胎儿心电图 ST 段分析)与单独 CTG 对急诊剖宫产率的影响:STan 澳大利亚随机对照试验(START)研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Aug 29;20(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3640-9.
2
Comparison of effect of CTG + STan with CTG alone on emergency Cesarean section rate: STan Australian Randomized controlled Trial (START).CTG+STan 与单独 CTG 比较对急诊剖宫产率的影响:STan 澳大利亚随机对照试验(START)。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;62(4):462-470. doi: 10.1002/uog.26279.
3
A randomised clinical trial on cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus cardiotocography plus ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (STAN) for intrapartum monitoring.一项关于产时监护中胎心监护联合胎儿血样采集与胎心监护联合胎儿心电图ST段分析(STAN)的随机临床试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007 Jul 26;7:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-13.
4
Fetal pulse oximetry for fetal assessment in labour.分娩时用于胎儿评估的胎儿脉搏血氧饱和度测定法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 7;2014(10):CD004075. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004075.pub4.
5
Women's satisfaction with intrapartum fetal surveillance: A mixed-method study within the STan Australian randomised controlled trial (START).产妇对产时胎儿监护的满意度:澳大利亚随机对照试验(START)中的混合方法研究。
Midwifery. 2025 Jan;140:104193. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104193. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
6
Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well-being.分娩时对胎儿心率进行间歇性听诊以评估胎儿健康状况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 13;2(2):CD008680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008680.pub2.
7
Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial.仅用胎心监护与胎心监护加胎儿心电图ST段分析用于产时胎儿监测:一项瑞典随机对照试验
Lancet. 2001 Aug 18;358(9281):534-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05703-8.
8
A qualitative study of a sample of women participating in an Australian randomised controlled trial of intrapartum fetal surveillance.一项对参与澳大利亚产时胎儿监测随机对照试验的女性样本的定性研究。
Midwifery. 2020 Apr;83:102655. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102655. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
9
A randomised clinical trial of intrapartum fetal monitoring with computer analysis and alerts versus previously available monitoring.计算机分析和报警的产时胎儿监护与先前可用的监护的随机临床试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Oct 28;10:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-71.
10
Cardiotocography combined with ST analysis versus cardiotocography combined with fetal blood sampling in deliveries with abnormal CTG: a randomized trial.在产时胎心监护异常的分娩中,胎心监护联合ST段分析与胎心监护联合胎儿血样采集的比较:一项随机试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jun;307(6):1771-1780. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06649-3. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence-based intrapartum care during vaginal births: Direct observations in a tertiary care hospital in Central Sri Lanka.阴道分娩期间基于证据的产时护理:斯里兰卡中部一家三级护理医院的直接观察
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 23;10(7):e28517. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28517. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
2
Comparison of effect of CTG + STan with CTG alone on emergency Cesarean section rate: STan Australian Randomized controlled Trial (START).CTG+STan 与单独 CTG 比较对急诊剖宫产率的影响:STan 澳大利亚随机对照试验(START)。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;62(4):462-470. doi: 10.1002/uog.26279.
3
Cardiotocography and Clinical Risk Factors in Early Term Labor: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Computerized Analysis With Oxford System.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children.剖宫产术对母婴健康的短期和长期影响。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5.
2
Change in practice: a qualitative exploration of midwives' and doctors' views about the introduction of STan monitoring in an Australian hospital.实践中的变化:对澳大利亚一家医院助产士和医生关于引入STan监测的观点的定性探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2920-5.
3
A pilot exploratory investigation on pregnant women's views regarding STan fetal monitoring technology.
足月前早产的胎心监护与临床危险因素:一项使用牛津系统计算机分析的回顾性队列研究
Front Pediatr. 2022 Mar 16;10:784439. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.784439. eCollection 2022.
关于 STan 胎儿监测技术,对孕妇观点的初步探索性调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1598-8.
4
The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI).出生满意度量表修订指标(BSS-RI)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1459-5.
5
Electronic Fetal Monitoring and Cesarean Birth: A Scoping Review.电子胎儿监护与剖宫产:一项范围综述
Birth. 2016 Dec;43(4):277-284. doi: 10.1111/birt.12247. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
6
Fetal monitoring in labor: Implications of evidence generated by new systematic review.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Jan;95(1):5-8. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12830.
7
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour.分娩期间用于胎儿监测的胎儿心电图(ECG)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 21;2015(12):CD000116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000116.pub5.
8
Intrapartum Fetal ECG ST-Segment Analysis.产时胎儿心电图ST段分析
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 17;373(25):2480. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1513251.
9
ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.产时胎儿监护中ST段波形分析与单纯胎心监护的比较:随机试验的系统评价与Meta分析
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Jan;95(1):16-27. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12828.
10
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of fetal scalp blood lactate measurement to reduce caesarean sections during labour: the Flamingo trial [ACTRN12611000172909].一项关于测量胎儿头皮血乳酸以减少分娩期间剖宫产的随机对照试验方案:火烈鸟试验[澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心编号:ACTRN12611000172909]
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Nov 3;15:285. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0709-7.