• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机分析和报警的产时胎儿监护与先前可用的监护的随机临床试验。

A randomised clinical trial of intrapartum fetal monitoring with computer analysis and alerts versus previously available monitoring.

机构信息

Departmento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdade de Medicina do Porto, Alameda Hernani Monteiro 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Oct 28;10:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-71.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-10-71
PMID:21029466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2987886/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intrapartum fetal hypoxia remains an important cause of death and permanent handicap and in a significant proportion of cases there is evidence of suboptimal care related to fetal surveillance. Cardiotocographic (CTG) monitoring remains the basis of intrapartum surveillance, but its interpretation by healthcare professionals lacks reproducibility and the technology has not been shown to improve clinically important outcomes. The addition of fetal electrocardiogram analysis has increased the potential to avoid adverse outcomes, but CTG interpretation remains its main weakness. A program for computerised analysis of intrapartum fetal signals, incorporating real-time alerts for healthcare professionals, has recently been developed. There is a need to determine whether this technology can result in better perinatal outcomes.

METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicentre randomised clinical trial. Inclusion criteria are: women aged ≥ 16 years, able to provide written informed consent, singleton pregnancies ≥ 36 weeks, cephalic presentation, no known major fetal malformations, in labour but excluding active second stage, planned for continuous CTG monitoring, and no known contra-indication for vaginal delivery. Eligible women will be randomised using a computer-generated randomisation sequence to one of the two arms: continuous computer analysis of fetal monitoring signals with real-time alerts (intervention arm) or continuous CTG monitoring as previously performed (control arm). Electrocardiographic monitoring and fetal scalp blood sampling will be available in both arms. The primary outcome measure is the incidence of fetal metabolic acidosis (umbilical artery pH < 7.05, BDecf > 12 mmol/L). Secondary outcome measures are: caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery rates, use of fetal blood sampling, 5-minute Apgar score < 7, neonatal intensive care unit admission, moderate and severe neonatal encephalopathy with a marker of hypoxia, perinatal death, rate of internal monitoring, tracing quality, and signal loss. Analysis will follow an intention to treat principle. Incidences of primary and secondary outcomes will be compared between groups. Assuming a reduction in metabolic acidosis from 2.8% to 1.8%, using a two-sided test with alpha = 0.05, power = 0.80, and 10% loss to follow-up, 8133 women need to be randomised.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide evidence of the impact of intrapartum monitoring with computer analysis and real-time alerts on the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes, intrapartum interventions and signal quality. (Current controlled trials ISRCTN42314164).

摘要

背景

产时胎儿缺氧仍然是死亡和永久性残疾的重要原因,在很大比例的病例中,存在与胎儿监测相关的护理不佳的证据。胎心监护(CTG)仍然是产时监测的基础,但医疗保健专业人员对其解读缺乏可重复性,并且该技术并未显示出能改善具有临床重要意义的结局。胎儿心电图分析的增加增加了避免不良结局的可能性,但 CTG 解读仍然是其主要弱点。最近开发了一种用于分析产时胎儿信号的计算机程序,该程序为医疗保健专业人员实时提供警报。需要确定这项技术是否能带来更好的围产结局。

方法/设计:这是一项多中心随机临床试验。纳入标准为:年龄≥16 岁的女性,能够提供书面知情同意书,单胎妊娠≥36 周,头位,无已知严重胎儿畸形,正在分娩但不包括活跃的第二产程,计划进行连续 CTG 监测,且无阴道分娩的已知禁忌证。符合条件的女性将使用计算机生成的随机序列随机分为两组:连续胎儿监测信号的计算机分析与实时警报(干预组)或之前进行的连续 CTG 监测(对照组)。在两个组中都将进行心电图监测和胎儿头皮血样采集。主要结局指标是胎儿代谢性酸中毒的发生率(脐动脉 pH<7.05,BDecf>12mmol/L)。次要结局指标为:剖宫产术和器械性阴道分娩率、胎儿血样采集的使用、5 分钟 Apgar 评分<7、新生儿重症监护病房入院、伴有缺氧标志物的中度和重度新生儿脑病、围产儿死亡、内部监测率、描记质量和信号丢失。分析将遵循意向治疗原则。将比较两组间主要和次要结局的发生率。假设代谢性酸中毒的发生率从 2.8%降低到 1.8%,使用双侧检验,α=0.05,效能=0.80,10%的失访率,需要随机分配 8133 名女性。

讨论

本研究将提供产时监测与计算机分析和实时警报对不良围产结局、产时干预和信号质量的影响的证据。(当前的对照试验 ISRCTN42314164)。

相似文献

1
A randomised clinical trial of intrapartum fetal monitoring with computer analysis and alerts versus previously available monitoring.计算机分析和报警的产时胎儿监护与先前可用的监护的随机临床试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Oct 28;10:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-71.
2
A randomised clinical trial on cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus cardiotocography plus ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (STAN) for intrapartum monitoring.一项关于产时监护中胎心监护联合胎儿血样采集与胎心监护联合胎儿心电图ST段分析(STAN)的随机临床试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007 Jul 26;7:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-13.
3
Central Fetal Monitoring With and Without Computer Analysis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.中央胎儿监测与计算机分析结合与不结合:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;129(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001799.
4
Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial.仅用胎心监护与胎心监护加胎儿心电图ST段分析用于产时胎儿监测:一项瑞典随机对照试验
Lancet. 2001 Aug 18;358(9281):534-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05703-8.
5
Significant reduction in umbilical artery metabolic acidosis after implementation of intrapartum ST waveform analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram.实施产时胎儿心电图 ST 波分析后,脐动脉代谢性酸中毒显著减少。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;221(1):63.e1-63.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.049. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
6
Intrapartum monitoring with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis in breech presentation: an observational study.产时胎心监护和 ST 段波形分析在臀位分娩中的应用:一项观察性研究。
BJOG. 2015 Mar;122(4):528-35. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12989. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
7
Computerised interpretation of the fetal heart rate during labour: a randomised controlled trial (INFANT).产时胎儿心率的计算机解读:一项随机对照试验(INFANT)。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Feb;22(9):1-186. doi: 10.3310/hta22090.
8
A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography--a randomised controlled study.产时自动胎儿心电图与传统胎心监护的比较——一项随机对照研究。
BJOG. 2006 Apr;113(4):419-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00886.x.
9
Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace.在胎儿心率监护结果不令人放心的情况下,进行产时胎儿头皮乳酸采样以评估胎儿状况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 1;2015(5):CD006174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006174.pub3.
10
Intrapartum cardiotocography with and without computer analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.产时胎心监护(有和无计算机分析):随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jul;33(13):2284-2290. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1542676. Epub 2018 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Changing Perspectives of Electronic Fetal Monitoring.电子胎儿监护的观念转变。
Reprod Sci. 2022 Jun;29(6):1874-1894. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00749-2. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
2
Prediction of intrapartum fetal hypoxia considering feature selection algorithms and machine learning models.考虑特征选择算法和机器学习模型的产时胎儿缺氧预测
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2019 Aug 20;7(1):17. doi: 10.1007/s13755-019-0079-z. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Computer-Aided Diagnosis System of Fetal Hypoxia Incorporating Recurrence Plot With Convolutional Neural Network.结合递归图与卷积神经网络的胎儿缺氧计算机辅助诊断系统
Front Physiol. 2019 Mar 12;10:255. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00255. eCollection 2019.
4
Investigating pH based evaluation of fetal heart rate (FHR) recordings.基于pH值的胎儿心率(FHR)记录评估研究。
Health Technol (Berl). 2017;7(2):241-254. doi: 10.1007/s12553-017-0201-7. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
5
Fetal monitoring: creating a culture of safety with informed choice.胎儿监护:通过知情选择营造安全文化。
J Perinat Educ. 2013 Summer;22(3):156-65. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.22.3.156.
6
Open access intrapartum CTG database.开放获取的产时电子胎心监护数据库
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 13;14:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-16.
7
Relation of fetal heart rate signals with unassignable baseline to poor neonatal state at birth.胎儿心率信号与出生时新生儿状态不良的无法分配基线有关。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012 Jul;50(7):717-25. doi: 10.1007/s11517-012-0923-7. Epub 2012 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of a computer system evaluation of intrapartum cardiotocographic events and a consensus of clinicians.计算机系统评估产时胎心监护图形与临床医生共识的比较。
J Perinat Med. 2010 Mar;38(2):191-5. doi: 10.1515/jpm.2010.030.
2
Prediction of neonatal acidemia by computer analysis of fetal heart rate and ST event signals.通过对胎儿心率和ST段事件信号进行计算机分析预测新生儿酸血症。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):464.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.033. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
3
Omniview-SisPorto 3.5 - a central fetal monitoring station with online alerts based on computerized cardiotocogram+ST event analysis.全景-西斯科波尔图3.5型——一款基于计算机化胎心宫缩图+ST段事件分析的具备在线警报功能的中央胎儿监护站。
J Perinat Med. 2008;36(3):260-4. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2008.030.
4
Review of the first 1502 cases of ECG-ST waveform analysis during labour in a teaching hospital.教学医院1502例分娩期间心电图ST段波形分析的回顾。
BJOG. 2007 Oct;114(10):1202-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01480.x.
5
Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance.胎儿心电图:产时监护中的ST段波形分析
BJOG. 2007 Oct;114(10):1191-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01479.x.
6
Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis.ST分析在临床实践中的局限性:三例产时代谢性酸中毒病例
BJOG. 2007 Oct;114(10):1194-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01236.x. Epub 2007 May 15.
7
Intrapartum cardiotocography -- the dilemma of interpretational variation.产时胎心监护——解读差异的困境
J Perinat Med. 2006;34(4):298-302. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2006.057.
8
Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.连续胎心监护(CTG)作为一种电子胎儿监护(EFM)形式,用于分娩期间的胎儿评估。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD006066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006066.
9
Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour.用于分娩期间胎儿监测的胎儿心电图(ECG)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD000116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000116.pub2.
10
ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram during labor: Nordic observational multicenter study.分娩期间胎儿心电图的ST段分析:北欧观察性多中心研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002 Oct;12(4):260-6. doi: 10.1080/jmf.12.4.260.266.