Service de médecine physique et réadaptation, hôpital Henry Gabrielle, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Saint-Genis-Laval, France.
Plate-forme "Mouvement et Handicap", hôpital Henry Gabrielle, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Saint-Genis-Laval, France.
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 29;14(8):e0221700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221700. eCollection 2019.
Stroke results in balance disorders and these directly affect autonomy and quality of life. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of physical therapy (PT) on balance and postural control after stroke.
We included all randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of PT on balance and postural control in adult patients after stroke without language restriction. Medline, Embase/Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Pascal, and Francis databases were searched until January 2019. Primary outcomes were balance (Berg Balance scale and Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke) and postural control with postural deviation or stability measurement in sitting or standing static evaluation. A pair of independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses with subgroups (categories of PT, time post-stroke, and lesion location) and meta-regression (duration of PT) were conducted.
A total of 145 studies (n = 5912) were selected from the 13,123 records identified. For balance, evidence was found in favor of the efficacy of functional task-training alone (standardized mean difference 0.39, 95% confidence interval [0.09; 0.68], heterogeneity I2 = 63%) or associated with musculoskeletal intervention and/or cardiopulmonary intervention (0.37, [0.19; 0.55], I2 = 48%), electrostimulation (0.91, [0.49; 1.34], I2 = 52%) immediately after intervention, compared to sham treatment or usual care (ST/UC). For postural deviation eyes open, assistive devices were more effective than no treatment (-0.21, [-0.37; -0.05], I2 = 0%) immediately after intervention; for postural stability eyes open, functional task-training and sensory interventions were more effective than ST/UC (0.97, [0.35; 1.59], I2 = 65% and 0.80, [0.46; 1.13], I2 = 37% respectively) immediately after intervention.
Functional task-training associated with musculoskeletal intervention and/or cardiopulmonary intervention and sensory interventions seem to be immediately effective in improving balance and postural stability, respectively. The heterogeneity of PT and the weak methodological quality of studies limited the interpretation and the confidence in findings.
中风会导致平衡障碍,这些直接影响到患者的自主性和生活质量。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是确定物理治疗(PT)对中风后患者平衡和姿势控制的疗效。
我们纳入了所有评估 PT 对中风后成人平衡和姿势控制疗效的随机对照试验,无语言限制。检索了 Medline、Embase/Scopus、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库、PEDro、Pascal 和 Francis 数据库,截至 2019 年 1 月。主要结局指标为平衡(伯格平衡量表和中风后姿势评估量表)和姿势控制,以坐姿或站立位静态评估时的姿势偏差或稳定性测量值表示。由两名独立的审查员选择研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。进行了亚组(PT 类别、中风后时间和病变部位)的荟萃分析和荟萃回归(PT 持续时间)。
从确定的 13123 条记录中,共选择了 145 项研究(n=5912)。关于平衡,有证据表明功能任务训练单独(标准化均数差 0.39,95%置信区间 [0.09; 0.68],异质性 I2=63%)或与肌肉骨骼干预和/或心肺干预相结合(0.37,[0.19; 0.55],I2=48%),电刺激(0.91,[0.49; 1.34],I2=52%)在干预后即刻更有效,与假治疗或常规护理(ST/UC)相比。对于睁眼时的姿势偏差,辅助设备比不治疗(-0.21,[-0.37; -0.05],I2=0%)在干预后即刻更有效;对于睁眼时的姿势稳定性,功能任务训练和感觉干预比 ST/UC 更有效(0.97,[0.35; 1.59],I2=65%和 0.80,[0.46; 1.13],I2=37%)在干预后即刻更有效。
与肌肉骨骼干预和/或心肺干预相结合的功能任务训练和感觉干预似乎立即有效,分别改善平衡和姿势稳定性。PT 的异质性和研究方法质量低限制了对研究结果的解释和信心。