Lesinski Melanie, Hortobágyi Tibor, Muehlbauer Thomas, Gollhofer Albert, Granacher Urs
Division of Training and Movement Sciences, Research Focus Cognition Sciences, University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, Building 12, 14469, Potsdam, Germany.
Centre for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sports Med. 2015 Dec;45(12):1721-38. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0375-y.
The effects of balance training (BT) in older adults on proxies of postural control and mobility are well documented in the literature. However, evidence-based dose-response relationships in BT modalities (i.e., training period, training frequency, training volume) have not yet been established in healthy older adults.
The objectives of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis are to quantify BT intervention effects and to additionally characterize dose-response relationships of BT modalities (e.g., training period, training frequency) through the analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that could maximize improvements in balance performance in healthy community-dwelling older adults.
A computerized systematic literature search was performed in the electronic databases PubMed and Web of Science from January 1985 up to January 2015 to capture all articles related to BT in healthy old community-dwelling adults.
A systematic approach was used to evaluate the 345 articles identified for initial review. Only RCTs were included if they investigated BT in healthy community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 years and tested at least one behavioral balance performance outcome (e.g., center of pressure displacements during single-leg stance). In total, 23 studies met the inclusionary criteria for review.
Weighted mean standardized mean differences between subjects (SMDbs) of the intervention-induced adaptations in balance performance were calculated using a random-effects model and tested for an overall intervention effect relative to passive controls. The included studies were coded for the following criteria: training modalities (i.e., training period, training frequency, training volume) and balance outcomes [static/dynamic steady-state (i.e., maintaining a steady position during standing and walking), proactive balance (i.e., anticipation of a predicted perturbation), reactive balance (i.e., compensation of an unpredicted perturbation) as well as balance test batteries (i.e., combined testing of different balance components as for example the Berg Balance Scale)]. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using I2 and Chi2-statistics. The methodological quality of each study was tested by means of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale.
Weighted mean SMDbs showed that BT is an effective means to improve static steady-state (mean SMDbs = 0.51), dynamic steady-state (mean SMDbs = 0.44), proactive (mean SMDbs = 1.73), and reactive balance (mean SMDbs = 1.01) as well as the performance in balance test batteries (mean SMDbs = 1.52) in healthy older adults. Our analyses regarding dose-response relationships in BT revealed that a training period of 11-12 weeks (mean SMDbs= 1.26), a frequency of three training sessions per week (mean SMDbs= 1.20), a total number of 36-40 training sessions (mean SMDbs = 1.39), a duration of a single training session of 31-45 min (mean SMDbs = 1.19), and a total duration of 91-120 min of BT per week (mean SMDbs = 1.93) of the applied training modalities is most effective in improving overall balance performance. However, it has to be noted that effect sizes for the respective training modalities were computed independently (i.e., modality specific). Because of the small number of studies that reported detailed information on training volume (i.e., number of exercises per training session, number of sets and/or repetitions per exercise, duration of single-balance exercises) dose-response relationships were not computed for these parameters.
The present findings have to be interpreted with caution because we indirectly compared dose-response relationships across studies using SMDbs and not in a single controlled study as it is difficult to separate the impact of a single training modality (e.g., training frequency) from that of the others. Moreover, the quality of the included studies was rather limited with a mean PEDro score of 5 and the heterogeneity between studies was considerable (i.e., I2 = 76-92 %).
Our detailed analyses revealed that BT is an effective means to improve proxies of static/dynamic steady-state, proactive, and reactive balance as well as performance in balance test batteries in healthy older adults. Furthermore, we were able to establish effective BT modalities to improve balance performance in healthy older adults. Thus, practitioners and therapists are advised to consult the identified dose-response relationships of this systematic literature review and meta-analysis. However, further research of high methodologic quality is needed to determine (1) dose-response relationships of BT in terms of detailed information on training volume (e.g., number of exercises per training session) and (2) a feasible and effective method to regulate training intensity in BT.
平衡训练(BT)对老年人姿势控制和活动能力指标的影响在文献中有充分记载。然而,健康老年人中基于证据的BT模式(即训练周期、训练频率、训练量)的剂量反应关系尚未确立。
本系统文献综述和荟萃分析的目的是量化BT干预效果,并通过分析随机对照试验(RCT)来进一步描述BT模式(如训练周期、训练频率)的剂量反应关系,这些试验能够最大限度地改善健康社区居住老年人的平衡能力。
1985年1月至2015年1月期间,在电子数据库PubMed和Web of Science中进行了计算机化系统文献检索,以获取所有与健康社区居住老年人BT相关的文章。
采用系统方法评估初步筛选出的345篇文章。仅纳入对≥65岁健康社区居住成年人进行BT研究且测试至少一项行为平衡能力结果(如单腿站立时压力中心位移)的RCT。总共23项研究符合纳入审查的标准。
使用随机效应模型计算干预引起的平衡能力适应的受试者加权平均标准化均数差(SMDbs),并测试相对于被动对照组的总体干预效果。纳入的研究根据以下标准进行编码:训练模式(即训练周期、训练频率、训练量)和平衡结果[静态/动态稳态(即站立和行走时保持稳定姿势)、主动平衡(即预测扰动的预期)、反应性平衡(即意外扰动的补偿)以及平衡测试组合(即不同平衡成分的联合测试,如Berg平衡量表)]。使用I2和卡方统计评估研究间的异质性。每项研究的方法学质量通过物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表进行测试。
加权平均SMDbs表明,BT是改善健康老年人静态稳态(平均SMDbs = 0.51)、动态稳态(平均SMDbs = 0.44)、主动平衡(平均SMDbs = 1.73)、反应性平衡(平均SMDbs = 1.01)以及平衡测试组合表现(平均SMDbs = 1.52)的有效手段。我们对BT剂量反应关系的分析表明,11 - 12周的训练周期(平均SMDbs = 1.26)、每周三次训练频率(平均SMDbs = 1.20)、36 - 40次训练总次数(平均SMDbs = 1.39)、单次训练31 - 45分钟时长(平均SMDbs = 1.19)以及每周BT总时长91 - 120分钟(平均SMDbs = 1.93)的应用训练模式在改善整体平衡能力方面最有效。然而,必须注意的是,各训练模式的效应量是独立计算的(即特定模式)。由于报告训练量详细信息(即每次训练的练习次数、每个练习的组数和/或重复次数、单次平衡练习时长)的研究数量较少,未计算这些参数的剂量反应关系。
本研究结果必须谨慎解读,因为我们使用SMDbs间接比较了不同研究间的剂量反应关系,而非在单一对照研究中进行,因为很难将单一训练模式(如训练频率)的影响与其他模式的影响区分开来。此外,纳入研究的质量相当有限,平均PEDro评分为5,研究间的异质性相当大(即I2 = 76 - 92%)。
我们的详细分析表明,BT是改善健康老年人静态/动态稳态、主动和反应性平衡指标以及平衡测试组合表现的有效手段。此外,我们能够确定改善健康老年人平衡能力的有效BT模式。因此,建议从业者和治疗师参考本系统文献综述和荟萃分析中确定的剂量反应关系。然而,需要进一步高质量的研究来确定(1)BT在训练量详细信息(如每次训练的练习次数)方面的剂量反应关系,以及(2)一种可行且有效的方法来调节BT中的训练强度。