Molecular Ecology and Fisheries Genetics Laboratory, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK.
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 29;9(1):12500. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48984-7.
Environmental DNA analysis has emerged as a key component of biodiversity and environmental monitoring. However, the state and fate of eDNA in natural environments is still poorly understood for many ecological systems. Here we assess the state and fate of eDNA derived from the water flea, Daphnia magna, using a full factorial mesocosm experiment. We measured the quantity and degradation of eDNA over a two month period across a range of filters differing in pore size (0, 0.2, 1 and 10 µm), which spans the range of eDNA source material including subcellular, cellular and tissue. We also used two primer sets targeting mitochondrial (COI) and nuclear (18S) genomic regions. Our findings demonstrated that eDNA was most prevalent in the effluent water, but also reliably detected on the 0.2 μm filter, suggesting subcellular material is the predominate state of eDNA. Temporal eDNA quantity dynamics followed an exponential decay function over the course of 6-17 days, demonstrating a predictable decline in eDNA concentration. Nuclear eDNA was more abundant than mitochondrial eDNA, which may be a result of greater primer affinity, or indicate greater availability of nuclear eDNA gene targets in the environment. In contrast to two previous size-sorting experiments, which utilizing fish eDNA, our findings suggest that the state of invertebrate eDNA is much smaller than previously suspected. Overall, our data suggest that the detection of eDNA greatly depends on our knowledge of the state and fate of eDNA, which differ among species, and likely across environmental conditions.
环境 DNA 分析已成为生物多样性和环境监测的关键组成部分。然而,对于许多生态系统,环境 DNA 在自然环境中的状态和命运仍然知之甚少。在这里,我们使用完全因子中观实验评估了水蚤(Daphnia magna)的 eDNA 的状态和命运。我们在两个月的时间内测量了不同孔径(0、0.2、1 和 10 µm)的过滤器中 eDNA 的数量和降解情况,这涵盖了包括亚细胞、细胞和组织在内的 eDNA 源材料的范围。我们还使用了针对线粒体(COI)和核(18S)基因组区域的两个引物组。我们的研究结果表明,eDNA 最常见于废水,但也可在 0.2 µm 过滤器上可靠检测到,这表明亚细胞物质是 eDNA 的主要状态。eDNA 数量的时间动态在 6-17 天的过程中遵循指数衰减函数,表明 eDNA 浓度可预测下降。核 eDNA 比线粒体 eDNA 更丰富,这可能是由于引物亲和力更大,或者表明环境中核 eDNA 基因靶标更易获得。与之前使用鱼类 eDNA 的两个大小分类实验不同,我们的研究结果表明,无脊椎动物 eDNA 的状态比之前怀疑的要小得多。总的来说,我们的数据表明,eDNA 的检测在很大程度上取决于我们对 eDNA 状态和命运的了解,而这些状态和命运因物种而异,并且可能因环境条件而异。