Suppr超能文献

保留乳头的乳房切除术与二期乳头重建术的比较:一项多机构研究。

Comparing Nipple-sparing Mastectomy to Secondary Nipple Reconstruction: A Multi-institutional Study.

机构信息

Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.

Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan, Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2021 Aug 1;274(2):390-395. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003577.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of women who underwent immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) after receiving either: (1) nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) or (2) simple mastectomy with subsequent nipple reconstruction (SNR).

BACKGROUND

The goal of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is to restore body image and quality-of-life after mastectomy, but removal of the nipple-areolar complex may have its own negative psychosocial consequences. NSM may have increased in popularity due to its perceived oncologic safety in many women and to reports of superior aesthetic results with this technique. Despite the increased utilization of NSM, few studies have evaluated the impact of NSM on PROs and complications in women undergoing immediate IBBR.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium study, a multicenter, prospective cohort study that recruited patients between February 2012 and July 2015. The primary aim of this study was to compare PROs as measured by BREAST-Q scores between women who underwent IBBR after NSM versus SNR. The secondary aim was to compare complication rates. Mixed-effects regression models controlled for demographic and clinical covariates.

RESULTS

Of the 600 women in the study, 286 (47.7%) underwent NSM. After controlling for baseline patient characteristics, we found no significant differences in satisfaction with breast, psychosocial well-being, physical well-being or sexual well-being between women undergoing NSM versus SNR. Mastectomy type was not a significant predictor of complications or reconstructive failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite reports of superior aesthetics for NSM over simple mastectomy with nipple reconstruction in immediate IBBR, we found no significant differences at 2 years after reconstruction in patient satisfaction, quality-of-life, or complication rates.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是比较接受以下两种乳房重建方式的女性的患者报告结局(PROs):(1)保留乳头乳晕复合体的乳房切除术(NSM)或(2)单纯乳房切除术伴随后的乳头重建术(SNR)。

背景

乳房切除术的重建目标是在乳房切除术后恢复身体形象和生活质量,但去除乳头乳晕复合体可能会带来自身的负面心理社会后果。NSM 的应用可能越来越广泛,这是因为它在许多女性中被认为具有肿瘤学安全性,并且有报道称该技术具有更好的美学效果。尽管 NSM 的应用增加,但很少有研究评估 NSM 对接受即刻即刻乳房重建的女性的 PROs 和并发症的影响。

方法

我们对乳房切除术重建结果联盟研究进行了二次分析,该研究是一项多中心、前瞻性队列研究,于 2012 年 2 月至 2015 年 7 月招募患者。本研究的主要目的是比较 NSM 与 SNR 后即刻行 IBBR 的女性的 PROs,以 BREAST-Q 评分衡量。次要目的是比较并发症发生率。混合效应回归模型控制了人口统计学和临床协变量。

结果

在研究的 600 名女性中,有 286 名(47.7%)接受了 NSM。在控制基线患者特征后,我们发现接受 NSM 的女性与接受 SNR 的女性在乳房满意度、心理社会幸福感、身体幸福感或性幸福感方面没有显著差异。乳房切除术类型不是并发症或重建失败的显著预测因素。

结论

尽管有报道称 NSM 在即刻 IBBR 中比单纯乳房切除术伴乳头重建具有更好的美学效果,但我们在重建后 2 年没有发现患者满意度、生活质量或并发症发生率的显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验