Therapeutiki Dialysis Unit, Chalkidikis St 77, 542 48, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Renal Department, General Hospital of Komotini, Komotini, Greece.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Oct;51(10):1841-1847. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02268-1. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
Reversing the connection mode of permanent dual-lumen dialysis catheters results in higher access recirculation that may compromise the dialysis adequacy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of reversed-connected dialysis with a higher versus a standard blood flow rate (Qb) on adequacy parameters and access recirculation.
In a cross-over design, 46 prevalent dialysis patients with a properly functioning cuffed, tunneled, dual-lumen catheter were evaluated in three consecutive mid-week dialysis sessions. At baseline, participants were evaluated under standardized conditions (correct connection, Qb = 300 ml/min). In Phase A, dialysis was performed with reversed connection and Qb = 300 ml/min. In Phase B, dialysis was performed with reversed connection and Qb = 400 ml/min. The sequence of evaluations (Phase A and B or vise verse) was randomized. All other dialysis-related parameters were unchanged in all three occasions.
As expected, compared with baseline, reversed-connected dialysis in Phase A resulted in lower URR and spKt/V, and in a higher recirculation rate. Compared with baseline, reversed-connected dialysis with a higher Qb in Phase B resulted in an even higher recirculation rate, but the parameters of dialysis adequacy were not different. Increase in Qb from 300 to 400 ml/min resulted in an improvement of the dialysis adequacy (URR: 64.1 ± 7.8% vs. 70.6 ± 8.2%, P < 0.001; spKt/V: 1.22 ± 0.3 vs. 1.45 ± 0.3, P < 0.001) despite the higher recirculation rate.
This study suggests that reversed-connected dialysis with increasing Qb maintains the adequacy of the delivered dialysis despite the compensatory increase in recirculation.
将永久性双腔透析导管的连接方式改为反向连接会导致更高的通路再循环,从而可能影响透析充分性。本研究旨在探讨与标准血流速率(Qb)相比,更高血流速率下反向连接透析对充分性参数和通路再循环的影响。
采用交叉设计,对 46 例功能正常的带套隧道双腔透析导管的维持性透析患者进行了三次连续的周中透析评估。在基线时,参与者在标准化条件下(正确连接,Qb=300ml/min)进行评估。在 A 期,采用反向连接和 Qb=300ml/min 进行透析。在 B 期,采用反向连接和 Qb=400ml/min 进行透析。评估的顺序(A 期和 B 期或反之)是随机的。所有其他与透析相关的参数在所有三次评估中均保持不变。
与基线相比,正如预期的那样,A 期反向连接透析导致 URR 和 spKt/V 更低,再循环率更高。与基线相比,B 期更高 Qb 的反向连接透析导致更高的再循环率,但透析充分性参数无差异。Qb 从 300ml/min 增加到 400ml/min 导致透析充分性改善(URR:64.1±7.8%比 70.6±8.2%,P<0.001;spKt/V:1.22±0.3 比 1.45±0.3,P<0.001),尽管再循环率更高。
本研究表明,在补偿性再循环增加的情况下,增加 Qb 的反向连接透析可以维持所提供透析的充分性。